Adapting research-Based practices with fidelity: Flexibility by design

Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities

Volumn 26, Issue , 2013, Pages 65-91

  Johnson, LeAnne D ^a   McMaster, Kristen L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886479221     PISSN: 0735004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0735-004X(2013)0000026006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Algozzine, B., Wang, C., White, R., Cooke, N., Marr, M.B., Algozzine, K.,Zamora Duran, G. (2012). Effects of multi-tier academic and behavior instruction on difficult-to-teach students. Exceptional Children, 79, 45-64.
2. August, G. J., Gewirtz, A. H., & Realmuto, G. M. (2010). Moving the field of prevention from science to service: Integrating evidence-based preventive interventions into community practice through adapted and adaptive models. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 14, 72-85.
3. August, G. J., Realmuto, G. M., Hektner, J. M., & Bloomquist, M. L. (2001). An integrated components preventive intervention for aggressive elementary school children: The Early Risers program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 614-626. (Pubitemid 32803850)
4. Baker-Henningham, H. (2011). Transporting evidence-based intervention across cultures: Using focus groups with teachers and parents of preschool children to inform the implementation of the Incredible Years Training Programme in Jamaica. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 37, 649-661.
5. Barrish, H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. (1968). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a regular classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119-124.
6. Battistich, V. (2003). Effects of a school-based program to enhance prosocial development on children's peer relations and social adjustment. Journal of Research in Character Education, 1(1), 1-16.
7. Bloomquist, M. L., August, G. J., Lee, S. S., Piehler, T. F., & Jensen, M. (2012). Parent participation within community center or in-home outreach delivery models of the early risers conduct problems prevention program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21, 368-383.
8. Boden, L. J., Ennis, R. P., & Jolivette, K. (2012). Implementing check in/check out for students with intellectual disability in self-contained classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45, 32-39.
9. Boettcher Minjarez, M., Williams, S. E., Mercier, E. M., & Hardan, A. Y. (2011). Pivotal response group treatment program for parents of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 92-101.
10. Bosworth, K., Gingiss, P., Potthoff, S. J., & Roberts-Gray, C. A. (1999). A Bayesian model to predict the success of the implementation of health and education innovations in school centered programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 1-11. (Pubitemid 29324291)
11. Caldwell, L. L., Bradley, S., & Coffman, D. (2009). A person-centered approach to individualizing a school-based universal preventive intervention. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35, 214-219.
12. Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., & Martinez, C. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5, 41-45. (Pubitemid 39023963)
13. Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23-45. (Pubitemid 28049555)
14. Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive interventions for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447-466. (Pubitemid 44482632)
15. Dietsch, B., Bayha, J. L., & Zheng, H. (2005, April). Short-term effects of a character education program among fourth grade students. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
16. Durlak, J. A., & Dupre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327-350.
17. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237-256. (Pubitemid 36457251)
18. Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2008). Bridging science to practice: Achieving prevention program implementation fidelity in the community youth development study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 235-249.
19. Felner, R. D., Favazza, A., Shim, M., Brand, S., Gu, K., & Noonan, N. (2001). Whole school improvement and restructuring as prevention and promotion: Lessons from STEP and the project on high performance learning communities. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 177-202. (Pubitemid 33379307)
20. Ferrer-Wreder, L., Adamson, L., Kumpfer, K. L., & Eichas, K. (2012). Advancing intervention science through effectiveness research perspective. Child and Youth Care Forum, 41, 109-117.
21. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 174-206.
22. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N. J.,O'Connor, R. E. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251-267.
23. Fuchs, D., McMaster, K., Saenz, L., Kearns, D., Fuchs, L., Yen, L., Compton, C., Lemons, C., Zhang, W., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Bringing educational innovation to scale: Topdown, bottom-up, or a third way? Presented at the IES Conference, Washington, DC.
24. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-165.
25. Good, R. H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Best practices in using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model. Best Practices in School Psychology 4, 1, 699-720.
26. Hancock, T. B., & Kaiser, A. P. (2006). Enhancing milieu teaching. In R. McCauley & M. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 203-233). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
27. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
28. Institute for Education Sciences. (2011). Request for grant applications: Special education research grants. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/funding/
29. Kaiser, A. P., & Grim, J. C. (2005). Teaching functional communication skills. In M. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (pp. 447-488). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
30. Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Harrower, J. K., & Carter, C. M. (1999). Pivotal response intervention 1: Overview of approach. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 175-185.
31. Kretlow, A. G., & Bartholomew, C. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 279-299.
32. Lau, A. S. (2006). Making the case for selective and directed cultural adaptations of evidencebased treatments: Examples from parent training. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13, 295-310. (Pubitemid 46729762)
33. Loman, S. L., Rodriguez, B. J., & Horner, R. H. (2010). Sustainability of a targeted intervention package: First step to success in Oregon. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 178-191.
34. O'Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33-84.
35. Power, T. J., Blom-Hoffman, J., Clarke, A. T., Riley-Tillman, T. C., Kelleher, C., & Manz, P. H. (2005). Reconceptualizing intervention integrity: A partnership-based framework for linking research with practice. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 495-507. (Pubitemid 40688213)
36. Pressley, M., Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2006). The state of educational intervention research as viewed through the lens of literacy intervention. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1-19. (Pubitemid 43472214)
37. Sanetti, L. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445-459.
38. Schulte, A. C., Easton, J. E., & Parker, J. (2009). Advances in treatment integrity research: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the conceptualization, measurement, and enhancement of treatment integrity. School Psychology Review, 38, 460-475.
39. Siemonsoma, P. C., Schroder, C. D., Roorda, L. D., & Lettinga, A. T. (2010). Benefits of treatment theory in the design of explanatory trials: cognitive treatment of illness perception in chronic low back pain rehabilitation as an illustrative example. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42, 111-116.
40. Songer, N. B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2005, April). Fidelity of implementation in three sequential curricular units. In S. Lynch (Chair) & C. L. O'Donnell, "Fidelity of implementation" in implementation and scale-up research designs: Applications from four studies of innovative science curriculum materials and diverse populations. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada
41. Stage, S. A., Cheney, D., Lynass, L., Mielenz, C., & Flower, A. (2012). Three validity studies of the daily progress report in relationship to the check, connect, and expect intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 181-191.
42. Stein, M. L., Berends, M., Fuchs, D., McMaster, K., Saenz, L., Yen, L., & Compton, D. L. (2008). Scaling up an early reading program: Relationships among teacher support, fidelity of implementation, and student performance across different sites and years. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 368-388.
43. Tanol, G., Johnson, L., McComas, J. J., & Cote, E . M. (2010). Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions of the good behavior game. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 337-355.
44. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Public Law No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 2002 U.S.C.
45. U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), P.L. No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400.
46. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 151-163.
47. Warren, S., Fey, M., & Yoder, P. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70-77. (Pubitemid 46399476)
48. Webster-Stratton, C. (1994). The Incredible Years Teacher Training Series. Seattle, WA: Author.
49. Webster-Stratton, C., Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., & Newcomer, L. L. (2011). The incredible years teacher classroom management training: The methods and principles that support fidelity of training delivery. School Psychology Review, 40, 509-529.
50. Zentall, S. S., & Beike, S. M. (2012). Achievement of social goals of younger and older elementary students: Response to academic and social failure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 39-53.