EMAC Distinguished Marketing Scholar 2012. Respect the data!

International Journal of Research in Marketing

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 323-334

  Laurent, Gilles ^a  

^a ECE PARIS and OMNES Education Research Center   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886427913     PISSN: 01678116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abelson H. Private communication 1974, 1974.
2. Alba J.W. In defense of bumbling. Journal of Consumer Research 2012, 38(6):981-987.
3. Albers S. Optimizable and implementable aggregate response modeling for marketing decision support. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2012, 29(2):111-122.
4. Atchinson J., Brown J.A.C. The lognormal distribution 1963, University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Bargh J.A., Chen M., Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype priming on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71:230-244.
6. Belsley D.A., Kuh E., Welsch R.E. Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of colinearity 1980, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
7. Bem D.J. Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100(3):407-425.
8. Bernstein D.M., Erdfelder E., Meltzoff A.N., Peria W., Loftus G.R. Hindsight bias from 3 to 95years of age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37(2):378-391.
9. Bhattacharjee, Y. (2013, April 28). The mind of a con man. The New York Times. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
10. Desai P.S. Marketing Science replication and disclosure policy. Marketing Science 2013, 32(1):1-3.
11. Doyen S., Klein O., Pichon C.L., Cleeremans A. Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind?. PLoS One 2012, 7:e29081. (http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029081).
12. Evanschitzky H., Baumgarth C., Hubbard R., Armstrong J.S. Replication research's disturbing trend. Journal of Business Research 2007, 60:411-415.
13. Francis G. The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7:585-594. 10.1177/1745691612459520.
14. Frederick S. Overestimating others' willingness to pay. Journal of Consumer Research 2012, 38:1-21.
15. Galak J., Meyvis T. The pain was greater if it will happen again: The effect of anticipated continuation on retrospective discomfort. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 2011, 140:63-75.
16. Galak J., Meyvis T. You could have just asked: Reply to Francis (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7:595-596. 10.1177/1745691612463079.
17. Goldenberg J., Muller E. Editorial. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2012, 29:v-vii.
18. Hamilton R. Trends and countertrends in consumer research. Presentation at the Haring Symposium, provided by Hamilton 2012.
19. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world?. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2010, 33(2-3):61-83.
20. Henry P.J. The college sophomore in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry 2008, 19(2):49-71.
21. Hooghe M., Stolle D., Maheo V.A., Vissers S. Why can't a student be more like an average person? Sampling and attrition effects in social science field and laboratory experiments. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2010, 628(1):85-96.
22. Ioannidis J.P.A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2005, 2(8):e124. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
23. Ioannidis J.P.A. Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7:645-654. 10.1177/1745691612464056.
24. John L., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science 2012, 235:524-532.
25. Johnson N.L., Kotz S., Balakrishnan N. Continuous univariate distributions 1994, Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
26. Kahn B. "Moving the needle:" Can ACR help increase our research productivity? ACR Presidential Address Available at. http://www.acrwebsite.org/research_resources/Kahn%20slides%20acr%20speech%202006.pdf.
27. Kahneman D. A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects. Open letter available on. http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/2012/10/05/kahneman-on-the-storm-of-doubts-surrounding-social-priming-research/.
28. Laurent G. Improving the external validity of marketing models: A plea for more qualitative input. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2000, 17:177-182.
29. Laurent G., Kapferer J.N. Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research 1985, 22(1):41-53.
30. Laurent G., Kapferer J.N., Roussel F. The underlying structure of brand awareness scores. Marketing Science 1995, 14(3, Part 2 of 2):G170-G179.
31. Levelt Committee, Noort Committee, Drenh Committee Flawed science: The fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel 2012, Tilburg University.
32. Limpert E., Stahel W.A., Abbt M. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues. Bioscience 2001, 51(5):341-352.
33. Lodish L.M., Abraham M., Kalmenson S., Livelsberger J., Lubetkin B., Richardson B., et al. How advertising works: A meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable T.V. advertising experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 1995, 32(2):125-139.
34. Luce M.F., McGill A., Peracchio L. Promoting an environment of scientific integrity: Individual and community responsibilities. Journal of Consumer Research 2012, 39(3):iii-viii.
35. Lynch John G. ACR fellow's address: Substantive consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research 2011, Vol. 38:1-10. Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN. D.W. Dahl, G.V. Johar, S.M.J. van Osselaer (Eds.).
36. Lynch J.G., Alba J.W., Krishna A., Morwitz V.G., Gürhan-Canli Z. Knowledge creation in consumer research: Multiple routes, multiple criteria. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2012, 22(4):473-495.
37. Makel M.C., Plucker J.A., Hegarty B. Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 2012(7):537.
38. Park C.W. Two types of attractive research: cute research and beautiful research. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2012, 22:299-302.
39. Park D.C., Hedden T., Davidson N.S., Lautenschlager G., Smith A.D. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging 2002, 17(2):299-320.
40. Pashler H., Wagenmakers E.J. Editors' Introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7:528-530. 10.1177/1745691612465253.
41. Peterson R.A. On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 2001, 28(3):450-461.
42. Retractionwatch http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/following-investigation-erasmus-social-psychology-professor-retracts-two-studies-resigns/.
43. Rindfleisch A., Malter A.J., Ganesan S., Moorman C. Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research 2008, 45(2):261-279.
44. Roediger H.L. Psychology woes and a partial cure: The value of replication. Observer 2012, 25(2).
45. Sears D.O. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51(3):515-530.
46. Sim C.H., Gan F.F., Chang T.C. Outlier labeling with boxplot procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2005, 100(470):642-652.
47. Simmons J.P., Nelson L.D., Simonsohn U. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 2011, 22(11):1359-1366.
48. Simonsohn U. Just post it: The lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statistics alone Available at SSRN:. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2114571.
49. Slovic P., Fischhoff B. On the psychology of experimental surprises. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3(4):544-551.
50. Smith L.D., Best L.A., Stubbs A., Archibald A.B., Robertson-Nay R. Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. American Psychologist 2002, 57(10):749-761.
51. Stapel D.A. Moving from fads and fashions to integration: Illustrations from knowledge accessibility research. European Bulletin of Social Psychology 2000, 12:4-27.
52. Townsend C., Liu W. Is planning good for you? The differential impact of planning on self-regulation. Journal of Consumer Research 2012, 39(4):688-703.
53. Tukey J.W. Exploratory data analysis 1977, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
54. Uncles M., Ehrenberg A.S.C., Hammond K. Patterns of buyer behavior: Regularities, models, and extensions. Marketing Science 1995, 14(3, part 2 of 2):G71-G78.
55. Volckner F., Sattler H. Empirical generalizability of consumer evaluations of brand extensions. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2007, 24(2):149-162.
56. Wagenmakers E.J., Wetzels R., Borsboom D., van der Maas H.L.J. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of Psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100(3):426-432.
57. Wan E.W., Rucker D.D. Confidence and construal framing: When confidence increases versus decreases information processing. Journal of Consumer Research 2013, 39(5):977-992.
58. Wikipedia (Consulted on 8 May 2013). http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Mechanical_Turk.
59. Winer R. Experimentation in the 21st century: The importance of external validity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1999, 27(3):349-358.
60. Yong E. Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature 2012, 485:298-300.