The Psychology of Replication and Replication in Psychology

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 585-594

  Francis, Gregory ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

aversion; effect size; memory; power; publication bias; replication; scientific method

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869063049     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691612459520     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Begg C. B.,Mazumdar M.Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.Biometrics. 1994;50:1088-1101.
2. Bem D. J.Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;100:407-425.
3. Berger J.,Berry D.Statistical decision theory and related topics. Gupta S. S.Berger J., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 1988:29-72.
4. ChampelyS. (2009). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis (R package version 1.1.1). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr.
5. Cohen J.The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist. 1994;49:997-1003.
6. Cumming G.Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012:.
7. Dutilh G.,Vanderkerckhove J.,Forstmann B. U.,Keullers E.,Brysbaert M.,Wagenmakers E.-J.Testing theories of post-error slowing.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2012;74:454-465.
8. Fisher R. A.The world of mathematics. Newman J. R., ed. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications; 1956:1512-1521.
9. Francis G.Evidence that publication bias contaminated studies relating social class and unethical behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2012a;109:E1587.
10. Francis G.Response to author: Some clarity about publication bias and wishful seeing.i-Perception. 2012b;3:.
11. Francis G.The same old new look: Publication bias in a study of wishful seeing.i-Perception. 2012c;3:176-178.
12. Francis G.Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012d;19:151-156.
13. Francis G.Publication bias in "Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men" by Elliotet al.(2010).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. :.
14. Galak J.,Meyvis T.The pain was greater if it will happen again: The effect of anticipated continuation on retrospective discomfort.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2011;140:63-75.
15. Hedges L. V.,Olkin I.Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1985:.
16. Ioannidis J. P. A.Why most discovered true associations are inflated.Epidemiology. 2008;19:640-648.
17. Ioannidis J. P. A.,Trikalinos T. A.An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings.Clinical Trials. 2007;4:245-253.
18. John L. K.,Loewenstein G.,Prelec D.Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling.Psychological Science. 2012;23:524-532.
19. Kruschke J. K.Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS. New York, NY: Academic Press/Elsevier Science; 2010:.
20. McCullough B. D.,McWilliams T. P.Baseball players with the initial "K" do not strike out more often.Journal of Applied Statistics. 2010;6:881-891.
21. McCullough B. D.,McWilliams T. P.Students with the initial "A" don't get better grades.Journal of Research in Personality. 2011;45:340-343.
22. R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (ISBN 3-900051-07-0). Available from http://www.R-project.org/.
23. Renkewitz F.,Fuchs H. M.,Fiedler S.Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?.Judgment and Decision Making. 2011;6:870-881.
24. Roberts S.,Pashler H.How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.Psychological Review. 2000;107:358-367.
25. RoedigerH. L. (2012). Psychology's woes and a partial cure: The value of replication. APS Observer, 25(2). Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2012/february-11-2012-observer-publications/psychology';s-woes-and-a-partial-cure-the-value-of-replication.html.
26. Rouder J. N.,Speckman P. L.,Sun D.,Morey R. D.,Iverson G.Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2009;16:225-237.
27. Schimmack U.The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple study articles.Psychological Methods. in press;.
28. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22:1359-1366.
29. Sterne J. A.,Gavaghan D.,Egger M.Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53:1119-1129.
30. Strube M. J.SNOOP: A program for demonstrating the consequences of premature and repeated null hypothesis testing.Behavior Research Methods. 2006;38:24-27.
31. Yuan K. H.,Maxwell S.On the post hoc power in testing mean differences.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2005;30:141-167.