You Could Have Just Asked: Reply to Francis (2012)

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 595-596

  Galak, Jeff ^a   Meyvis, Tom ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

data; file drawer; meta analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869068391     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691612463079     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Francis G.The psychology of replication and replication in psychology.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:585-594.
2. Galak J.,Meyvis T.The pain was greater if it will happen again: The effect of anticipated continuation on retrospective discomfort.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2011;140:63-75.
3. Hedges L. V.,Olkin I.Statistical methods for meta- analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1985:.
4. Rosenthal R.The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86:638-641.
5. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False- ositive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22 (11): 1359-1366.
6. Simonsohn U.It does not follow: Evaluating the one-off publication bias critiques by Francis (2012a, 2012b, 2012c, 2012d, 2012e, in press).Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:597-599.