Response to Intervention

Evidence-Based Practice in Infant and Early Childhood Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 667-686

  Mccabe, Paul C ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Education curriculum; Learning delays; Learning disability; Response to intervention; Special education services

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886317832     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118269602.ch23     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 300-316.
2. Bagnato, S. J. (2005). The authentic alternative for assessment in early intervention: An emerging evidence-based practice. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 17-22.
3. Bagnato, S. J., & Ho, H. Y. (2006). High-stakes testing with preschool children: Violation of professional standards for evidence-based practice in early childhood intervention. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 3, 23-43.
4. Bagnato, S. J., Suen, H. K., Brickley, D., Smith-Jones, J., & Dettore, E. (2002). Child developmental impact of Pittsburgh's Early Childhood Initiative (ECI) in high-risk communities: First-phase authentic evaluation research. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 559-580.
5. Barnett, D. W., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2007). Achieving science-based practice through response to intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 31-54.
6. Barnett, W. S., Hustedt, J. T., Friedman, A. H., Boyd, J. S., & Ainsworth, P. (2007). The State of Preschool 2007: State Preschool Yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: The National Institute for Early Education Research. Retrieved from http://nieer.org/year.book/pdf/yearbook.pdf.
7. Blair, C. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children's functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57(2), 111-127.
8. Bowman, B., Donovan, S., & Burns, M. S. (2000). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
9. Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice-Revised. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
10. Brigance, A. N. (1985). Brigance Screens-II. Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates. Brown-Chidsey, R., &
11. Steege, M. W. (2005) Response to Intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press.
12. Burns, M. K., Jacobs, S., & Wagner, A. R. (2008). Ethical and legal issues associated with using response-to-intervention to assess learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 263-279.
13. Cadigan, K., & Missall, K. N. (2007). Measuring expressive language growth in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 110-118.
14. Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., Cline, G., & Kuntz, S. (2004). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in social skills for infants and toddlers. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 91-114.
15. Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., Kaminski, R., Good, R., McConnell, S. R., et al. (2002). Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDIs): Assessment that guides intervention for young children. In M. Ostrosky & E. Horn (Eds.), Assessment: Gathering meaningful information. Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series #4, 15-28.
16. Choudhury, N., Leppanen, P. H., Leevers, H. J., & Benasich, A. A. (2007). Infant information processing and family history of specific language impairment: Converging evidence for RAP deficits from two paradigms. Developmental Science, 10, 213-236.
17. Coleman, M. R., Buysse, V., & Neitzel, J. (2006). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at-risk for learning disabilities. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, FPG Child Development Institute.
18. Deno, S. (1997). Whither thou goest... perspectives on progress monitoring. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 77-99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Deno, S. L. (2005). Problem-solving assessment. In R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach. (pp. 10-40). New York: Guilford Press.
20. Floyd, R. G., Hojnoski, R., & Key, J. (2006). Preliminary evidence of the technical adequacy of the Preschool Numeracy Indicators. School Psychology Review, 35, 627-644.
21. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2006).Aframework for building capacity for responsiveness to intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 621-626.
22. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-Intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 157-171.
23. Gerber, M. M. (2005). Teachers are still the test: Limitations of response to instruction strategies for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 516-524.
24. Gettinger, M., & Stoiber, K. (2008). Applying a response-to-intervention model for early literacy development in low-income children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 198-213.
25. Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., Cline, G., Kuntz, S., & Leitschuh, C. (2002). Developing a general outcomemeasure of growth in movement for infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 143-157.
26. Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., Carta, J. J., & Higgins, S. K. (2006). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in the cognitive abilities of children 1 to 4 years old: The Early Problem-Solving Indicator. School Psychology Review, 35, 535-551.
27. Griffin, S. (2007). Early intervention for children at risk of developing mathematical learning difficulties. In D. B. Berch & M. M. Mazzocco (2007). Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. (pp. 373-395). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
28. Griffiths, A.-J., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Parson, L. B., & Burns, M. K. (2006). Practical applications of response-to-intervention research. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 50-57.
29. Hagans-Murillo, K. (2005). Using a response-to-intervention approach in preschool to promote literacy. The California School Psychologist, 10, 45-54.
30. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Public Law No. 108-1446.
31. Jacob, S., & Hartshorne, T. S. (2007). Ethics and law for school psychologists. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
32. Johnson, E., Mellard, D. F., & Byrd, S. E. (2005). Alternative models of learning disabilities identification: Considerations and initial conclusions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 569-572.
33. Kavale, K. A. (2005). Identifying specific learning disability: Is responsiveness to intervention the answer? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 553-562.
34. Key, J. M. (2007). Effects of a teacher-delivered mathematics intervention on the mathematical skills of preschoolers of low socioeconomic status in head start settings. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(8-A), 3272.
35. Love, J. M., Kisker, E. E., Ross, C., Raikes, H., Constantine, J., Boller, K., et al. (2005). The effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-year-old children and their parents: Lessons for policy and programs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 885-901.
36. Luze, G. J., Linebarger, D. L., Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Walker, D., Leitschuh, C., et al. (2001). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in the expressive communication of infants and toddlers. School Psychology Review, 30, 383-406.
37. Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 539-544.
38. McCabe, P. C. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI) in early childhood: Challenges and practical guidelines. Journal of Early Childhood and Infant Psychology, 2, 157-180.
39. McConnell, S. R., McEvoy, M., Carta, J., Greenwood, C., Kaminski, R., Good, R., et al. (1998). Research and development on individual growth indicators for children birth to age eight. (Technical Report 4).
40. Missall, K. N., & McConnell, S. R. (2004). Early literacy development: Skill growth and relations between classroom variables for preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 1-21.
41. Missall, K. N., Reschly, A., Betts, J., McConnell, S. R., Heistad, D., Pickart, M., et al. (2007). Examination of the predictive validity of preschool early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 36, 433-452.
42. NAEYC. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8: A position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
43. NAEYC. (2008). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8: A DRAFT position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. Washington, DC: NAEYC. Retrieved from www.naeyc.org/about/positions/pdf/draftdap0208.pdf.
44. National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. (2005). Review of progress monitoring tools. Washington, DC: Author.
45. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2006). Learning disabilities and young children: Identification and intervention. Available from www.ldonline.org.
46. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. Jack P. Shonkoff and Deborah A. Phillips (Eds.), Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. Neisworth, J. T., & Bagnato, S. J. (2004). The mismeasure of young children: The authentic assessment alternative. Infants and Young Children, 17, 198-212.
48. Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K. (2005). The state of state pre-kindergarten standards. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 125-145.
49. Nitsiou, C. (2006). Tracking the status of language development in language-minority kindergarteners. Early Child Development and Care, 176, 817-833.
50. Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2005). Neuropsychological aspects for evaluating learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 563-568.
51. Shinn, M. R. (2007). Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within response to intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 601-617.
52. Snyder, P. A., Wixson, C. S., Talapatra, D., & Roach, A. T. (2008). Instruction-focused strategies to support response-to-intervention frameworks. Assessment in Early Childhood, 34, 25-35.
53. VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2005). Intervention-driven assessment practices in early childhood/early intervention: Measuring what is possible rather than what is present. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 28-33.
54. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Broussard, C., & Cooley, A. (2006). Further development of measures of early math performance for preschoolers. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 533-553.
55. VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Snyder, P. (2006). Integrating frameworks from early childhood intervention and school psychology to accelerate growth for all young children. School Psychology Review, 35, 519-534.
56. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Snyder, P., Broussard, C., & Ramsdell, K. (2008). Measuring response to early literacy intervention with preschoolers at risk. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 232-249.
57. Wackerle, A. K. (2007). Test review: Selection of general growth outcomes for children between birth and eight. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 51-54.
58. Ysseldyke, J. E. (2005). Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: What if this is as good as it gets? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 125-128.