Integrating frameworks from early childhood intervention and school psychology to accelerate growth for all young children

School Psychology Review

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 519-534

  VanDerHeyden, Amanda M ^a   Snyder, Patricia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846542567     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., III, Jones, K. M., & Lentz, F. E., Jr. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically-based special service decisions from increasing and decreasing intensity single case designs. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66-79.
2. Barnett, D. W., Elliott, N., Wolsing, L., Bunger, C. E., Haski, H., McKissick, C., & Vander Meer, C. D. (2006). Response to intervention for young children with extremely challenging behaviors: What it might look like. School Psychology Review, 35, 568-582.
3. Barnett, D. W., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (in press). Achieving science-based practice through response to intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation.
4. Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (rev.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. The American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
6. Brown, W. H., Odom, S. L., & Conroy, M. A. (2001). An intervention hierarchy for promoting preschool children's peer interactions in natural environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 162-175.
7. Carta, J. J. (2002). An early childhood special education research agenda in a culture of accountability for results. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 102-104.
8. Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., Cline, G., & Kuntz, S. (2004). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in social skills for infants and toddlers. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 91-114.
9. Christ, T. J., & Poncy, B. C. (2005). Guest editors' introduction to a special issue on response to intervention. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 299-303.
10. Coleman, M. R., Buysse, V., & Neitzel, J. (2006, May). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at-risk for learning disabilities. Full report. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, FPG Child Development Institute.
11. Division for Early Childhood. (2005, September). Comments submitted by the Division for Early Childhood to the Part B IDEA notice of proposed rulemaking. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.dec-sped.org/ pdf/Policy/DEC_Comments_Nashville%206_17_05.pdf
12. Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. Early Childhood Outcomes Center. (2005, April). Family and child outcomes for early intervention and early childhood special education. Available from: http:// www.the-eco-center.org.
14. Fox, L., Dunlap, G., Hemmeter, M. L., Joseph, G. E., & Strain, P. (2003). The teaching pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58(4), 48-52.
15. Fuchs, L. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 172-186.
16. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488-500.
17. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
18. Good, R. H., III, & Kaminski, R. A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326-336.
19. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
20. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Smith, S. (1998). Effective academic intervention in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. School Psychology Review, 27, 45-56.
21. Good Start, Grow Smart Initiative (2002). Good Start, Grow Smart: The Bush administration's early childhood initiative. Retrieved September 6, 2006, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/earlychildhood/ toc.html
22. Good Start, Grow Smart Interagency Workgroup. (2005, December). Good Start, Grow Smart: A guide to Good Start, Grow Smart and other federal early learning initiatives. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.acf .hhs.gov/programs/ccb/ta/gsgs/fedpubs/interagencyl.htm
23. Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., Cline, G., Kuntz, S., & Leitschuh, C. (2002). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in movement for infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 143-157.
24. Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., Carta, J. J., & Higgins, S. K. (2006). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in the cognitive abilities of children 1 to 4 years old: The early problem-solving indicator. School Psychology Review, 35, 535-551.
25. Griffin, S., & Case, R. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education, 3, 1-49.
26. Guralnick, M. J. (1997). The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
27. Guralnick, M. J. (2005). An overview of the developmental systems model for early intervention. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The developmental systems approach to early intervention (pp. 1-23). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
28. Hagans-Murillo, K. (2005). Using a response-to-intervention approach in preschool to promote literacy. The California School Psychologist, 10, 45-54.
29. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
30. Hemmeter, M. L., Ostrosky, M., Fox, L. (2006). Social and emotional foundations for early learning: A conceptual model for intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 583-601.
31. Hojnoski, R. L., & Missall, K. N. (2006). Addressing school readiness: Expanding school psychology in early education. School Psychology Review, 35, 602-614.
32. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004), PL. 108-446 (2004).
33. Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H., III. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
34. Komatsu, C., & Witt, J. C. (2006). Assessing effects of directive complexity on accuracy of task completion in English language learners. School Psychology Review, 35, 552-567.
35. Luze, G. J., Linebarger, D. L., Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Walker, D., Leitschuh, C., & Atwater, J. B. (2001). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in expressive communication of infants and toddlers. School Psychology Review, 30, 383-406.
36. Macmann, G. M., & Barnett, D. W. (1999). Diagnostic decision making in school psychology: Understanding and coping with uncertainty. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 519-548). New York: Wiley.
37. Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194-215.
38. Meisels, S. J. (2006, March). Accountability in early childhood: No easy answers. Chicago: Erikson Institute, Herr Research Center for Children and Social Policy. Retrieved August 20, 2006, from http://www .erikson.edu/research.asp?file=publications_topic
39. Missall, K. N., McConnell, S. R., & Cadigan, K. (2006). Early literacy development: Skill growth and relations between classroom variables for preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 29(1), 1-21.
40. National Association for the Education of Young Children & The National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education. (2002). Early learning standards: Creating the conditions for success. Washington, DC: Author.
41. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication Number 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. Neisworth, J. T., & Bagnato, S. J. (1992). The case against intelligence testing in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 1-20.
44. No Child Left Behind Act (2002). PL 107-110.
45. Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (1998). Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist, 53, 109-120.
46. Reschly, D. J., Tilly, W. D., III, & Grimes, J. P. (1999). Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
47. Sandall, S. R., Hemmeter, M. E., Smith, B. J., & McLean, M. E. (2005). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education. Longmont, CO: Sopris.
48. Sandall, S., & Schwartz, I. (2002). Building blocks for teaching preschoolers with special needs. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
49. Sandall, S., Schwartz, I., & Joseph, G. (2001). A building blocks model for effective instruction in inclusive early intervention settings. Young Exceptional Children, 4, 3-9.
50. Shinn, M. R., & Bamonto, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: "Big ideas" and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford Press.
51. Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children's mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99-120.
52. VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2005). Intervention-driven assessment practices in early childhood/early intervention: Measuring what is possible instead of what is present. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 28-33.
53. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Broussard, C., & Cooley, A. (in press). Further development of measures of early math performance for preschoolers. Journal of School Psychology.
54. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Broussard, C., Fabre, M., Stanley, J., Legendre, J., & Creppel, R. (2004). Development and validation of curriculum-based measures of math performance for four-year old children. Journal of Early Intervention, 27, 27-41.
55. VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2005). Quantifying context in assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and problem-solving model of identification. School Psychology Review, 34, 161-183.
56. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Barnett, D. A. (2005). The emergence and possible futures of response to intervention. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 339-361.
57. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Naquin, G. (2003). Development and validation of a process for screening referrals to special education. School Psychology Review, 32, 204-227.
58. Walker, H. M., Stieber, S., & O'Neill, R. E. (1990). Middle school behavioral profiles of antisocial and at-risk control boys: Descriptive and predictive outcomes. Exceptionality, 1, 61-77.
59. Wolery, M. (2005). Child-focused intervention practices. In S. Sandall, M. L. Hemmeter, B. J. Smith, & M. McLean (Eds.), DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide. (pp. 71-106). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.