Runoff forecasting using a Takagi-Sugeno neuro-fuzzy model with online learning

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 488, Issue , 2013, Pages 17-32

  Talei, Amin ^a,d   Chua, Lloyd Hock Chye ^a   Quek, Chai ^b   Jansson, Per Erik ^c  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

ANFIS; DENFIS; Global learning; Local learning; Neuro fuzzy systems; Rainfall runoff modeling

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; FUZZY INFERENCE; FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS; FUZZY SYSTEMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; RAIN; REAL TIME CONTROL; RUNOFF; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANFIS; DENFIS; GLOBAL LEARNING; LOCAL LEARNING; NEUROFUZZY SYSTEM; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING;

CATCHMENTS;

FORECASTING METHOD; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; WAVE MODELING;

EID: 84886101097     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abrahart, R.J., Kneale, P.E., See, L.M., 2004. Neural Networks for Hydrological Modelling. Taylor & Francis, p. 304
2. Alley, W.M., Dawdy, D.R., Schaake Jr., J.C., 1980. Parametric-deterministic urban watershed model. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 106, 679-690 (HY5, Proc. Paper, 15,392)
3. Aqil, M., Kita, I., Yano, A., Nishiyama, S., 2007. A comparative study of artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy in continuous modeling of the daily and hourly behaviour of runoff. J. Hydrol. 337 (1-2), 22-34
4. Bergstrom, S., 1976. Development and Application of a Conceptual Runoff Model for Scandinavian Catchments. SMHI Reports RHO, No. 7, Norrköping
5. Bergstrom, S., Forsman, A., 1973. Development of a conceptual deterministic rainfall-runoff model. Nord. Hydrol. 4 (3), 1973
6. Chang, F.J., Chang, Y.T., 2006. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of water level in reservoir. Adv. Water Resour. 29 (1), 1-10
7. Chiang, Y.M., Chang, L.C., Tsai, M.J., Wang, Y.F., Chang, F.J., 2011. Auto-control of pumping operations in sewerage systems by rule-based fuzzy neural networks Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (1), 185-196
8. Chua, L.H.C., Wong, T.S.W., Sriramula, L.K., 2008. Comparison between kinematic wave and artificial neural network models in event-based runoff simulation for an overland plane. J. Hydrol. 357 (3-4), 337-348
9. da CostaCouto, M.P., 2009. Review of input determination techniques for neural network models based on mutual information and genetic algorithms. Neural Comput. Appl. 18 (8), 891-901
10. Dawson, C.W., See, L.M., Abrahart, R.J., Heppenstall, A.J., 2006. Symbiotic adaptive neuro-evolution applied to rainfall-runoff modelling in northern England Neural Networks 19 (2), 236-247
11. Dinpashoh, Y., Fakheri-Fard, A., Moghaddam, M., Jahanbakhsh, S., Mirnia, M., 2004 Selection of variables for the purpose of regionalization of Iran's precipitation climate using multivariate methods. J. Hydrol. 297 (1-4), 109-123
12. Elshorbagy, A., Corzo, G., Srinivasulu, S., Solomatine, D.P., 2010a. Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology - Part 1: concepts and methodology. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (10), 1931-1941
13. Elshorbagy, A., Corzo, G., Srinivasulu, S., Solomatine, D.P., 2010b. Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology - Part 2: application. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (10), 1943-1961
14. Goodwin, G.C., Sin, K.S., 1984. Adaptive Filtering Prediction and Control. Prentice-Hall, p. 540
15. Govindaraju, R.S., 2000. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: hydrologic applications. J. Hydrol. Eng. 5 (2), 124-137
16. Hasanpour Kashani, M., Dinpashoh, Y., 2012. Evaluation of efficiency of different estimation methods for missing climatological data. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 26 (1), 59-71
17. He, J., Valeo, C., Chu, A., Neumann, N.F., 2011. Prediction of event-based stormwater runoff quantity and quality by ANNs developed using PMI-based input selection. J. Hydrol. 400 (1-2), 10-23
18. Hong, Y.S.T., White, P.A., 2009. Hydrological modeling using a dynamic neuro-fuzzy system with on-line and local learning algorithm. Adv. Water Resour. 32 (1), 110-119
19. Hsia, T.C., 1977. System Identification: Least Squares Methods. D.C. Heath, Boston, MA
20. Kasabov, N.K., Song, Q., 2002. DENFIS: dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system and its application for time-series prediction. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10 (2), 144-154
21. Krause, P., Boyle, D.P., Bäse, F., 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv. Geosci. 5, 89-97
22. Lighthill, M.J., Whitham, G.B., 1955. On kinematic waves II: a theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc. Roy. Soc. 229 (1178), 317-345.
23. Mamdani, E.H., 1974. Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 121 (12), 1585-1588
24. Mukerji, A., Chatterjee, C., Singh Raghuwanshi, N., 2009. Flood forecasting using ANN, neuro-fuzzy, and neuro-GA models. J. Hydrol. Eng. 14 (6), 647-652
25. Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10 (3), 282-290
26. Nayak, P.C., Sudheer, K.P., Rangan, D.M., Ramasastri, K.S., 2004. A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. J. Hydrol. 291 (1- 2), 52-66
27. Nayak, P.C., Sudheer, K.P., Rangan, D.M., Ramasastri, K.S., 2005. Short-term flood forecasting with a neurofuzzy model. Water Resour. Res. 41 (4), 1-16
28. Quah, K.H., Quek, C., 2006. FITSK: online local learning with generic fuzzy input Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy framework for nonlinear system estimation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 36 (1), 166-178
29. Rajurkar, M.P., Kothyari, U.C., Chaube, U.C., 2002. Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrol. Sci. J. 47 (6), 865-878
30. Remesan, R., Shamim, M.A., Han, D., Mathew, J., 2009. Runoff prediction using an integrated hybrid modelling scheme. J. Hydrol. 372 (1-4), 48-60
31. Sanikhani, H., Kisi, O., Nikpour, M.R., Dinpashoh, Y., 2012. Estimation of daily pan evaporation using two different adaptive neuro-fuzzy computing techniques Water Resour. Manage. 26 (15), 4347-4365
32. Takagi, T., Sugeno, M., 1985. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15 (1), 116-132
33. Talei, A., Chua, L.H.C., 2012. Influence of lag time on event-based rainfall-runoff modeling using the data driven approach. J. Hydrol. 438-439, 223-233
34. Talei, A., Chua, L.H.C., Quek, C., 2010a. A novel application of a neuro-fuzzy computational technique in event-based rainfall-runoff modeling. Expert Syst Appl. 37 (12), 7456-7468
35. Talei, A., Chua, L.H.C., Wong, T.S.W., 2010b. Evaluation of rainfall and discharge inputs used by Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) in rainfall-runoff modeling. J. Hydrol. 391 (3-4), 248-262
36. Tan, S.B.K., Chua, L.H.C., Shuy, E.B., Lo, E.Y.M., Lim, L.M., 2008. Performances of rainfall-runoff models calibrated over single and continuous storm flow events J. Hydrol. Eng. 13 (7), 597-607
37. Van Ooyen, A., Nienhuis, B., 1992. Improving the convergence of the backpropagation algorithm. Neural Networks 5 (3), 465-471
38. Wang, W.C., Chau, K.W., Cheng, C.T., Qiu, L., 2009. A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J. Hydrol. 374 (3-4), 294-306
39. Wong, T.S.W., 2008. Optimum rainfall interval and manning's roughness coefficient for runoff simulation. J. Hydrol. Eng. 13 (11), 1097-1102