Comparison between kinematic wave and artificial neural network models in event-based runoff simulation for an overland plane

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 357, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 337-348

  Chua, Lloyd H C ^a   Wong, Tommy S W ^a   Sriramula, L K ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Event based; Hydrograph; Kinematic wave model; Rainfall runoff

Indexed keywords

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); FLUID MECHANICS; FORECASTING; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; KINEMATICS; NEURAL NETWORKS; RAIN; RUNOFF; WAVES;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK (ANN) MODELS; ELSEVIER (CO); GENERAL (CO); KINEMATIC WAVE (KW); LOSS MODELING; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING; RUNOFF DATA; RUNOFF PREDICTION; RUNOFF SIMULATION; STORM EVENTS; TIME LAGS; TOTAL RAINFALL; TRAINING DATA;

BACKPROPAGATION;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ASPHALT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HYDROGRAPH; KINEMATICS; PREDICTION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; WAVE;

EID: 47049118310     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agarwal A., and Singh R.D. Runoff modelling through back propagation artificial neural network with variable rainfall-runoff data. Wat. Res. Mgt. 18 (2004) 285-300
2. Alley W.M., Dawdy D.R., and Schaake J.C. Parametric-deterministic urban watershed model. J. Hydraulic Eng. 106 HY5 (1980) 679-690
3. Antar M.A., Elassiouti I., and Allam M.N. Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks technique: a blue Nile catchment case study. Hydrol. Proc. 29 (2006) 1201-1216
4. Chua H.C.L., and Holz K.P. Hybrid neural network - finite element river flow model. J. Hydraulic Eng. 131 1 (2005) 52-59
5. Dawson C.W., and Wilby R.L. Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Prog. Phy. Geog. 25 1 (2001) 80-108
6. Dolling O.R., and Varas E.A. Artificial neural network for streamflow prediction. J. Hydraulic Res. 40 5 (2002) 547-554
7. Engman E.T. Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff. J. Irr. Drain. Eng. 112 1 (1986) 39-53
8. Haykin S. Neural Networks - A Comprehensive Foundation (1998), Prentice Hall
9. Jain A., and Indurthy S.K.V.P. Comparative analysis of event-based rainfall-runoff modeling techniques - deterministic, statistical and artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 8 2 (2003) 93-98
10. Jain A., and Srinivasulu S. Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and conceptual techniques. J. Hydrol. 317 (2006) 291-306
11. Kang I.S., Park J.I., and Singh V.P. Effect of urbanization on runoff characteristics of the On-Cheon stream watershed in Pusan, Korea. Hydrol. Proc. 12 2 (1998) 351-363
12. MATLAB, 2002. Neural Network Toolbox Reference Manual, Release 13. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.
13. McCuen R.H., Knight Z., and Cutter A.G. Evaluation of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency index. J. Hydrol. Eng. 11 6 (2006) 597-602
14. Minns A.W., and Hall M.J. Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Sci. 41 3 (1996) 399-417
15. Moradkhani H., Hsu K.-L., Gupta H.V., and Sorooshian S. Improved streamflow forecasting using self-organizing radial basis function artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. 295 (2004) 246-262
16. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I - a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10 (1970) 282-290
17. Pilgrim D.H., and Cordery I. Flood runoff. In: Maidment D.R. (Ed). Handbook of Hydrology (1993), McGraw-Hill, New York 9.1-9.4
18. Pulido-Calvo I., and Portela M.M. Application of neural approaches to one-step daily flow forecasting in Portuguese watersheds. J. Hydrol. 332 (2007) 1-15
19. Rajurkar M.P., Kothyari U.C., and Chaube U.C. Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network. J. Hydrol. 285 (2004) 96-113
20. Reed R.D., and Marks R.J. Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
21. Shamseldin A.Y. Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modeling. J. Hydrol. 199 3-4 (1997) 272-294
22. Tayfur G., Moramarco T., and Singh V.P. Predicting and forecasting flow discharge at sites receiving significant lateral inflow. Hydrological Processes 21 (2007) 1848-1859
23. Tayfur G., and Singh V.P. ANN and fuzzy logic models for simulating event-based rainfall-runoff. J. Hydrol. Eng. 132 12 (2006) 1321-1330
24. Wong T.S.W., and Lim C.K. Effect of loss model on evaluation of Manning roughness coefficient of experimental concrete catchment. J. Hydrol. 331 1-2 (2006) 2050-2218
25. Wong T.S.W., and Koh X.C. Which model type is best for deterministic rainfall-runoff modelling?. In: Robinson L.N. (Ed). Water Resources Research Progress (2008), Nova Science Publishers, New York 241-260
26. Wu J.S., Han J., Annambhotla A., and Bryant S. Artificial neural networks for forecasting watershed runoff and stream flows. J. Hydrol. Eng. 10 3 (2005) 216-222