Using the TPACK framework to unite disciplines in online learning

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 549-565

  Anderson, Alan ^a   Barham, Nicholas ^a   Northcote, Maria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b AVONDALE COLLEGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886061176     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.24     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, A., & Barham, N. (2010). Blended learning: Commonalities in practice across a multidiscipline group of online learning facilitators. In R. Muldoon (Ed.), Rethinking learning in your discipline. Proceedings of the University Learning and Teaching Futures Colloquium 2010. University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
2. Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (2004). Theory and practice of online learning Retrieved from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/contents.html
3. Bell, A., & Morris, G. (2009). Engaging professional learning in online environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 700-713.
4. Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e-learning: using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30(1), 5-21.
5. Berg, B. L. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Bright, S. (2007). E-teachers at work: Exploring a process for reviewing e-teaching for ongoing professional learning ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore (pp. 71-74). Singapore.
7. De Gagne, J. C., & Walters, K. (2009). Online teaching experience: A qualitative metasynthesis. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 577-599.
8. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346.
9. Dole, S., & Bloom, L. (2009). Online course design: A case study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-11.
10. Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Albion, P. (2010). Beyond pedagogical content knowledge: the importance of TPACK for informing preservice teacher education in Australia. In N. Reynolds & M. Turcsanyi-Szabo (Eds.), Key competencies in the knowledge society. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 324, pp. 114-125). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
11. Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. London: Sage.
12. Fuscoa, J., Haavindb, S., Remolda, J., & Schanka, P. (2011). Exploring differences in online professional development seminars with the community of inquiry framework. Educational Media International, 48(3), 139-149.
13. Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., Clair St, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79.
14. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments Journal Educational Technology Research and Development 48(3), 23-48.
15. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Herrington, T. (2007). Authentic learning on the web: Guidelines for course design. Faculty of Education Papers: University of Wollongong.
16. Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for preservice science seachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564.
17. Kerns, B., Elhouar, S., Sterling, M. J., Grant, J. M., McGowan, M., Rubash, A., . Wolffe, R. (2005). Ten principles of effective teaching and practical examples for the classroom and Blackboard. Retrieved from http://www.forschungsnetzwerk.at/downloadpub/2005_bradley_univ_RecommendedEffUseOfBb.pdf
18. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
19. Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers' beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157-181.
20. Lucas, S. (2005). Who am I? The influence of teacher beliefs on the incorporation of instructional technology by higher education faculty The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
21. Matzen, N. J., & Edmunds, J. A. (2007). Technology as a catalyst for change: The role of professional development. Journal of Research on Technology Education, 39(4), 417-430.
22. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service.
23. Merriman, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Meyer, K. A. (2010). The role of disruptive technology in the future of higher education. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 33(1), 6.
25. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
26. Mitchell, J., Hunter, J., & Mockler, N. (2011). Connecting classrooms in rural communities through interactive whiteboards. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 464-476.
27. Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
28. Northcote, M. (2008). Sense of place in online learning environments. Paper presented at the ASCILITE 2008: Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Deakin University, Victoria.
29. Northcote, M., Seddon, J., & Brown, P. (2011). Benchmark yourself: Self-reflecting about online teaching. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings ASCILITE Hobart 2011 (pp. 904-908). Hobart, Tasmania: ASCILITE (Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education).
30. Norton, L., Richardson, T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers' beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50(4), 537-571.
31. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
32. Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
33. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
34. Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2008). Success factors for blended learning. Paper presented at the Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ASCILITE 2008, Melbourne, Victoria.
35. Sunderberg, B., Spante, M., & Stenlund, J. (2012). Disparity in practice: diverse strategies among teachers implementing interactive whiteboards into teaching in two Swedish primary schools. Learning Media and Technology, 37(3), 253-270.
36. Van Duzer, J. (2002). Instruction design tips for online learning. Retrieved 9 October, 2008, from http://www.csuchico.edu/tlp/resources/rubric/instructionalDesignTips.pd