Community structure in the phonological network

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue AUG, 2013, Pages

  Siew, Cynthia S Q ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Community structure; Language acquisition; Language evolution; Lexical processing; Mental lexicon; Network science; Phonology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885364826     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00553     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Chichester: Wiley.
2. Arbesman, S., Strogatz, S. H., and Vitevitch, M. S. (2010a). Comparative analysis of networks of phonologically similar words in English and Spanish. Entropy 12, 327-337. doi: 10.3390/e12030327
3. Arbesman, S., Strogatz, S. H., and Vitevitch, M. S. (2010b). The structure of phonological networks across multiple languages. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 20, 679-685. doi: 10.1142/S021812741002596X
4. Auer, E. T., and Luce, P. A. (2005). "Probabilistic phonotactics in spoken word recognition," in The Handbook of Speech Perception, eds D. B. Pisoni and R. E. Remez (Oxford: Blackwell), 610-630. doi: 10.1002/9780470757024.ch25
5. Bailey, T. M., and Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods. J. Mem. Lang. 44, 568-591. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2756
6. Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., and Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A 311, 590-614. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7
7. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., and Jacomy, M. (2009). "Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks," in Proceedings of the 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, (San Jose, CA), 361-362.
8. Batagelj, V., and Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek-program for large network analysis. Connections 21, 47-57.
9. Beckage, N., Smith, L., and Hills, T. (2011). Small worlds and semantic network growth in typical and late talkers. PLoS ONE 6:e19348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019348
10. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., and Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008:P10008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
11. Borge-Holthoefer, J., and Arenas, A. (2010). Semantic networks: structure and dynamics. Entropy 12, 1264-1302. doi: 10.3390/e12051264
12. Broadbent, D. E. (1967). Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychol. Rev. 74, 1-15. doi: 10.1037/h0024206
13. Brysbaert, M., Wijnendaele, I. V., and Deyne, S. D. (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychol. 104, 215-226. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00021-4
14. Bullmore, E., and Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186-198. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575
15. Chan, K. Y., and Vitevitch, M. S. (2009). The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35, 1934-1949. doi: 10.1037/a0016902
16. Chan, K. Y., and Vitevitch, M. S. (2010). Network structure influences speech production. Cogn. Sci. 34, 685-697. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01100.x
17. Clune, J., Mouret, J.-B., and Lipson, H. (2013). The evolutionary origins of modularity. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.2743. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2863
18. Cortese, M. J., and Khanna, M. M. (2008). Age of acquisition ratings for 3, 000 monosyllabic words. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 791-794. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.791
19. De Deyne, S., Navarro, D. J., Perfors, A., and Storms, G. (2012). "Strong structure in weak semantic similarity: a graph based account," in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (Austin, TX), 1464-1469.
20. Derényi, I., Palla, G., and Vicsek, T. (2005). Clique percolation in random networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:160202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.160202
21. Erdõs, P., and Renyi, A. (1961). On the strength of connectedness of a random graph. Acta Math. Hung. 12, 261-267. doi: 10.1007/BF02066689
22. Ferrer I Cancho, R., and Solé, R. V. (2003). Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 788-791. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0335980100
23. Frauenfelder, U. H., Baayen, R. H., and Hellwig, F. M. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. J. Mem. Lang. 32, 781-804. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1039
24. Frisch, S. A., Large, N. R., and Pisoni, D. B. (2000). Perception of wordlikeness: effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords. J. Mem. Lang. 42, 481-496. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2692
25. Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486, 75-174. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002
26. Fortunato, S., and Barthelemy, M. (2007). Resolution limit in community detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 36-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605965104
27. Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., and Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. J. Mem. Lang. 45, 468-492. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2784
28. Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., and Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: a review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychol. 115, 43-67. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.002
29. Girvan, M., and Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7821-7826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122653799
30. Goh, W. D., Suárez, L., Yap, M. J., and Tan, S. H. (2009). Distributional analyses in auditory lexical decision: neighborhood density and word-frequency effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 882-887. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.882
31. Greenberg, J. H., and Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American english. Word 20, 157-177.
32. Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., and Firl, A. (2007). Google and the mind predicting fluency with pagerank. Psychol. Sci. 18, 1069-1076. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02027.x
33. Hills, T. T., Jones, M. N., and Todd, P. M. (2012). Optimal foraging in semantic memory. Psychol. Rev. 119, 431-440. doi: 10.1037/a0027373
34. Hills, T. T., Maouene, J., Riordan, B., and Smith, L. B. (2010). The associative structure of language: contextual diversity in early word learning. J. Mem. Lang. 63, 259-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.002
35. Hills, T. T., Maouene, M., Maouene, J., Sheya, A., and Smith, L. (2009). Longitudinal analysis of early semantic networks preferential attachment or preferential acquisition. Psychol. Sci. 20, 729-739. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02365.x
36. Hockett, C. F. (1960). "Logical considerations in the study of animal communication," in Animal Sounds and Communication, eds W. E. Lanyon and W. N. Tavolga (Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences), 392-430.
37. Kessler, B., and Treiman, R. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in english syllables. J. Mem. Lang. 37, 295-311. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2522
38. Kitchovitch, S., and Liò, P. (2011). Community structure in social networks: applications for epidemiological modelling. PLoS ONE 6:e22220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022220
39. Kucera, H., and Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
40. Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., and Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30, 000 english words. Behav. Res. Methods 44, 978-990. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
41. Lambiotte, R., Delvenne, J.-C., and Barahona, M. (2008). Laplacian dynamics and multiscale modular structure in networks. Xiv preprint arXiv:0812.1770.
42. Lancichinetti, A., Kivelä, M., Saramäki, J., and Fortunato, S. (2010). Characterizing the community structure of complex networks. PLoS ONE 5:e11976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011976
43. Landauer, T. K., and Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 119-131. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80001-5
44. Luce, P. A., and Large, N. R. (2001). Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition. Lang. Cogn. Process. 16, 565-581. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000137
45. Luce, P. A., and Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear. 19, 1-36. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
46. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25, 71-102. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9
47. Maxwell, S. E., and Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective. New York, NY: Psychology Press Taylor and Francis Group.
48. McQueen, J. M. (1996). Word spotting. Lang. Cogn. Process. 11, 695-699. doi: 10.1080/016909696387114
49. McQueen, J. M., and Sereno, J. (2005). Cleaving automatic processes from strategic biases in phonological priming. Mem. Cogn. 33, 1185-1209. doi: 10.3758/BF03193222
50. Newman, M. E. (Ed.). (2003). Random Graphs as Models of Networks. Berlin: Wiley-VCH.
51. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Detecting community structure in networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 321-330. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00124-y
52. Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 8577-8582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103
53. Newman, M. E. J., and Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69:026113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
54. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., and Cutler, A. (2002). Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Mem. Cogn. 30, 399-411. doi: 10.3758/BF03194940
55. Nowak, M. A., Krakauer, D. C., and Dress, A. (1999). An error limit for the evolution of language. Proc. Biol. Sci. 266, 2131-2136. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0898
56. Nusbaum, H. C., Pisoni, D. B., and Davis, C. K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: measuring the familiarity of 20, 000 words. Res. Speech Percept. Prog. Rep. 10, 357-376.
57. Onnela, J.-P., Fenn, D. J., Reid, S., Porter, M. A., Mucha, P. J., Fricker, M. D., et al. (2012). Taxonomies of networks from community structure. Phys. Rev. E 86:036104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.036104
58. Porter, M. A., Onnela, J.-P., and Mucha, P. J. (2009). Communities in networks. Not. AMS 56, 1082-1097.
59. Ravasz, E., and Barabási, A. L. (2003). Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 67:026112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026112
60. Ravasz, E., Somera, A. L., Mongru, D. A., Oltvai, Z. N., and Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297, 1551-1555. doi: 10.1126/science.1073374
61. Sapir, E. (1933). La rálité psychologique des phonèmes. J. Psychol. 30, 247-265.
62. Savin, H. B. (1963). Word-frequency effect and errors in the perception of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 200. doi: 10.1121/1.1918432
63. Savin, H. B., and Bever, T. G. (1970). The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 9, 295-302. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80064-0
64. Schiller, N. O., Meyer, A. S., Baayen, R. H., and Levelt, W. J. (1996). A comparison of lexeme and speech syllables in Dutch. J. Quant. Linguist. 3, 8-28. doi: 10.1080/09296179608590060
65. Steyvers, M., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cogn. Sci. 29, 41-78. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3
66. Taft, M., and Hambly, G. (1986). Exploring the cohort model of spoken word recognition. Cognition 22, 259-282. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90017-X
67. Traud, A. L., Kelsic, E. D., Mucha, P. J., and Porter, M. A. (2008). Community structure in online collegiate social networks. Organization 88, 92.
68. Tria, F., Galantucci, B., and Loreto, V. (2012). Naming a structured world: a cultural route to duality of patterning. PLoS ONE 7:e37744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037744
69. Turner, J. E., Valentine, T., and Ellis, A. W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision. Mem. Cogn. 26, 1282-1291. doi: 10.3758/BF03201200
70. Vitevitch, M. S. (2008). What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 51, 408. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/030)
71. Vitevitch, M. S., Chan, K. Y., and Roodenrys, S. (2012). Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory. J. Mem. Lang. 67, 30-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.008
72. Vitevitch, M. S., Ercal, G., and Adagarla, B. (2011). Simulating retrieval from a highly clustered network: implications for spoken word recognition. Front. Psychol. 2:369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00369
73. Vitevitch, M. S., and Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychol. Sci. 9, 325-329. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00064
74. Vitevitch, M. S., and Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. J. Mem. Lang. 40, 374-408. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2618
75. Vitevitch, M. S., and Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in english. Behav. Res. Methods 36, 481-487. doi: 10.3758/BF03195594
76. Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., and Auer, E. T. (1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words. Brain Lang. 68, 306-311. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2116
77. Vitevitch, M. S., and Rodríguez, E. (2005). Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. J. Multiling. Commun. Disord. 3, 64-73. doi: 10.1080/14769670400027332
78. Watts, D. J. (2004). The "new" science of networks. Annu. Rev. Soc. 30, 243-270. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
79. Watts, D. J., and Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'small-world'networks. Nature 393, 440-442. doi: 10.1038/30918
80. Wu, K., Taki, Y., Sato, K., Sassa, Y., Inoue, K., Goto, R., et al. (2011). The overlapping community structure of structural brain network in young healthy individuals. PLoS ONE 6:e19608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019608
81. Yook, S. H., Jeong, H., and Barabási, A. L. (2002). Modeling the Internet's large-scale topology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 13382-13386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172501399
82. Zipf, G. K. (1935). The Psycho-Biology of Language. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
83. Zuidema, W., and De Boer, B. (2009). The evolution of combinatorial phonology. J. Phon. 37, 125-144. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.10.003