Strong structure in weak semantic similarity: A graph based account

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1464-1469

  De Deyne, Simon ^a,b   Navarro, Daniel J ^b   Perfors, Amy ^b   Storms, Gert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

semantic networks; similarity; word associations

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; MAMMALS; SEMANTICS;

ALTERNATIVE FORCED CHOICE; GRAPH-BASED; RELATED ENTITIES; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SEMANTICS NETWORKS; SIMILARITY; SIMILARITY MEASURE; WORD MEANING; WORD SIMILARITY; WORD-ASSOCIATION;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 84878243215     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. Bohn, R. E., & Short, J. E. (2009). How much information? 2009. Report on American Consumers (Tech. Rep.). Global Information Industry Center. University of California, San Diego.
3. De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2008a). Word Associations: Network and Semantic properties. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 213-231.
4. De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2008b). Word associations: Norms for 1,424 Dutch words in a continuous task. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 198-205.
5. De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W., Verheyen, S., Navarro, D., & Storms, G. (2011). Graded structure in adjective categories. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1834-1839). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
6. Goodman, N. (1972). Problems and projects. In N. Goodman (Ed.), (p. 437-447). New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
7. Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Firl, A. (2007). Google and the Mind. Psychological Science, 18, 1069–1076.
8. Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211-244.
9. Hutchinson, J. (1989). NETSCAL: A network scaling algorithm for nonsymmetric proximity data. Psychometrika, 54, 25-51.
10. Kemeny, J., & Snell, J. (1976). Finite markov chains. Springerverlag.
11. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s Problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
12. Leicht, E., Holme, P., & Newman, M. (2006). Vertex similarity in networks. Psychical Review E, 73, 026120.
13. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
14. Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (p. 179-195). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Miller, K. T., Griffiths, T. L., & Jordan, M. I. (2009). Nonparametric latent feature models for link prediction. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 22, p. 1276-1284).
16. Minkov, E. (2008). Adaptive graph walk based similarity measures in entity-relation graphs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Computer Science Carnegie Melon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
17. Navarro, D. J., & Lee, M. D. (2002). Commonalities and distinctions in featural stimulus representations. In W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 24, p. 685-690). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 402–407.
19. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Winograd, T. (1998). The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. (Tech. Rep.). Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
20. Quillian, M. (1968). Semantic information processing. In M. Minsky (Ed.), (p. 227-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1994). Retrieving information from memory: Spreading-activation theories versus compound-cue theories. Psychological Review, 101, 177-184.
22. Ruts, W., De Deyne, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Verbeemen, T., & Storms, G. (2004). Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 506–515.
23. Sloman, S. A., & Rips, L. J. (1998). Similarity as an explanatory construct. Cognition, 65, 87–101.
24. Steyvers, M., Shiffrin, R. M., & Nelson, D. L. (2004). Experimental Cognitive Psychology and its Applications. In A. Healy (Ed.), (chap. Word association Spaces for Predicting Semantic Similarity Effects in Episodic Memory.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Van Dongen, S. (2000). Graph clustering by flow simulation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.