Reporting Self-Made Errors: The Impact of Organizational Error-Management Climate and Error Type

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 189-208

  Gronewold, Ulfert ^a   Gold, Anna ^b   Salterio, Steven E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditors; Error reporting; Error management climate; Organizational climate; Self discovered errors

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884974797     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1500-6     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Adkins, N., & Radtke, R. R. (2004). Students' and faculty members' perceptions of the importance of business ethics and accounting ethics education: Is there an expectations gap? Journal of Business Ethics, 51(3), 279-300.
2. Alderman, C. W., & Deitrick, J. W. (1982). Auditors' perceptions of time budget pressures and premature sign-offs: A replication and extension. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 1(2), 54-68.
3. Antle, R., & Nalebuff, B. (1991). Conservatism and auditor-client-negotiations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(Supplement), 31-54.
4. Armstrong, M. B. (1987). Moral development and accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education, 5(1), 27-43.
5. Asare, S. K., & McDaniel, L. S. (1996). The effects of familiarity with the preparer and task complexity on the effectiveness of the audit review process. The Accounting Review, 71(2), 139-159.
6. Ashforth, B. E., & Lee, R. T. (1990). Defensive behavior in organizations: A preliminary model. Human Relations, 43(7), 621-648.
7. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1993). The recency effect: Implicit learning with explicit retrieval? Memory and Cognition, 21(2), 146-155.
8. Bamber, E. M., & Ramsay, R. J. (1997). An investigation of the effects of specialization in audit workpaper review. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(3), 501-513.
9. Bamber, E. M., & Ramsay, R. J. (2000). The effects of specialization in audit workpaper review on review efficiency and reviewers' confidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 147-157.
10. Barrett, M., Cooper, D. J., & Jamal, K. (2005). Globalization and the coordinating of work in multinational audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(1), 1-24.
11. Bowrin, A. R. (1998). Review and synthesis of audit structure literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 17, 40-71.
12. Brazel, J. F., Agoglia, C. P., & Hatfield, R. C. (2004). Electronic versus face-to-face review: The effects of alternative forms of review on auditors' performance. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 949-966.
13. Buchan, H. F. (2005). Ethical decision making in the public accounting profession: An extension of Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(2), 165-181.
14. Burgstahler, D., Glover, S. M., & Jiambalvo, J. (2000). Error projection and uncertainty in the evaluation of aggregate error. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 79-99.
15. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB). (2004). Public report on initial quality inspections of the four largest accounting firms, October 6. Toronto, CA: CPAB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://www. cpab-ccrc. ca/EN/content/1st_Public_Report_OCt_6_2004. pdf.
16. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB). (2005). Second public report on quality inspections of public accounting firms, August 18. Toronto, CA: CPAB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://www. cpab-ccrc. ca/EN/content/2nd_Public_Report_Aug_18_2005_eng. pdf.
17. Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2001). Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 161-177.
18. Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 459-484.
19. Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2003). Exploring social desirability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 291-302.
20. Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (1993). A validation and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1), 13-26.
21. Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., Sharp, D. J., & Holder-Webb, L. (2007). The effect of perceived fairness on opportunistic behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 1119-1138.
22. Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B., & Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 293-328.
23. Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 423-431.
24. Dirsmith, W., & Covaleski, M. A. (1985). Informal communications, nonformal communications and mentoring in public accounting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(2), 149-170.
25. Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5-28.
26. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
27. Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling "Holier Than Thou": Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861-975.
28. Eynon, G., Hill, N. T., & Stevens, K. T. (1997). Factors that influence the moral reasoning abilities of accountants: Implications for universities and the profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12/13), 1297-1309.
29. Ferguson, A., Francis, J., & Stokes, D. (2003). The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review, 78(2), 429-448.
30. Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303-315.
31. Fisher, R. J., & Tellis, G. J. (1998). Removing social desirability bias with indirect questioning: Is the cure worse than the disease? Advances in Consumer Research, 15(25), 563-567.
32. Francis, J., Maydew, L. E., & Sparks, H. C. (1999). The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 17-34.
33. Ganushchak, L. Y., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of time pressure on verbal self-monitoring: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1125(1), 104-115.
34. Ganushchak, L. Y., & Schiller, N. O. (2008a). Motivation and semantic context affect brain error-monitoring activity: An event-related brain potentials study. NeuroImage, 39(1), 395-405.
35. Ganushchak, L. Y., & Schiller, N. O. (2008b). Brain error-monitoring activity is affected by semantic relatedness: An event-related brain potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(5), 927-940.
36. Gibbins, M., & Newton, J. (1994). An empirical exploration of complex accountability in public accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2), 165-186.
37. Gibbins, M., Salterio, S., & Webb, A. (2001). Evidence about auditor-client management negotiation concerning client's financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 535-563.
38. Gibbins, M., & Trotman, K. T. (2002). Audit review: Managers' interpersonal expectations and conduct of the review. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 411-444.
39. Gillingham, D. W., Blanco, J., & Lewko, J. H. (1997). An integrated model of error management. Disaster Prevention and Management, 6(3), 186-190.
40. Gronewold, U., & Donle, M. (2011). Audit firms' organizational error climate and auditors' predispositions toward handling errors. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(2), 69-92.
41. Harding, N., & Trotman, K. T. (1999). Hierarchical differences in audit workpaper review performance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(4), 671-684.
42. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42(2), 113-157.
43. Hermanson, H. M. (1997). The effects of audit structure and experience on auditors' decisions to isolate errors. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9(Supplement), 76-93.
44. Hermanson, D. R., Houston, R. W., & Rice, J. C. (2007). PCAOB inspections of smaller CPA firms: Initial evidence from inspection reports. Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 137-152.
45. Hofmann, D. A., & Mark, B. (2006). An investigation of the relationship between safety climate and medication errors as well as other nurse and patient outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 847-869.
46. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47. Homsma, G. J., van Dyck, C., De Gilder, D., Koopman, P. L., & Elfring, T. (2009). Learning from error: The influence of error incident characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 115-122.
48. Hyatt, T. A., & Prawitt, D. F. (2001). Does congruence between audit structure and auditors' locus of control affect job performance? The Accounting Review, 76(2), 263-274.
49. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2010a). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 220: Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements. New York: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved February 27, 2012, from http://www. ifac. org/sites/default/files/downloads/a010-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-220. pdf.
50. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2010b). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 230: Audit documentation. New York: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://web. ifac. org/download/a011-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-230. pdf.
51. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2010c). International Standard on Quality Control (ISQC) 1: Quality control for firms that perform audits and reviews of financial statements, and other assurance and related services engagements. New York: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved February 27, 2012, from, http://www. ifac. org/sites/default/files/downloads/a007-2010-iaasb-handbook-isqc-1. pdf.
52. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395.
53. Jones, J., Massey, D. W., & Thorne, L. (2003). Auditors' ethical reasoning: Insights from past research and implications for the future. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 45-103.
54. Kanodia, C., Bushman, R., & Dickhaut, J. (1989). Escalation errors and the sunk cost effect: An explanation based on reputation and information asymmetries. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 59-77.
55. Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management, 34(5), 978-1008.
56. Kelley, T., & Margheim, L. (1990). The impact of time budget pressure, personality, and leadership variables on dysfunctional auditor behavior. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(2), 21-42.
57. Kennedy, J. (1993). Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: A framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 231-245.
58. King, R. R. (1996). Reputation formation for reliable reporting: An experimental investigation. The Accounting Review, 71(3), 375-396.
59. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569-598.
60. Kuenzi, M., & Schminke, M. (2009). Assembling fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for the organizational work climate literature. Journal of Management, 35(3), 634-717.
61. Larrick, R. P. (1993). Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 440-450.
62. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41-104.
63. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Lewis, P. V. (1985). Defining 'Business Ethics': Like nailing jello to a wall. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(5), 377-383.
65. Luu, P., Flaisch, T., & Tucker, D. M. (2000). Medial frontal cortex in action monitoring. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(1), 464-469.
66. Malone, C. F., & Roberts, R. W. (1996). Factors associated with the incidence of reduced audit quality behaviors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(2), 49-64.
67. Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 647-660.
68. Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175-194.
69. Mayhew, B. W. (2001). Auditor reputation building. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 599-617.
70. Mayhew, B. W., & Murphy, P. R. (2009). The impact of ethics education on reporting behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 397-416.
71. McDaniel, L. S. (1990). The effects of time pressure and audit program structure on audit performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(2), 267-285.
72. McNair, C. J. (1991). Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 635-653.
73. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in organizations. LEA Organization and Management Series. Mahwah, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
74. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2009). A word to the wise: How managers and policy-makers can encourage employees to report wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 379-396.
75. Miller, D. L., & Thomas, S. (2005). The impact of relative position and relational closeness on the reporting of unethical acts. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 315-328.
76. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently and why. New York: Free Press.
77. Nooteboom, S., & Quené, H. (2008). Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 837-861.
78. Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88(1), 1-15.
79. Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J. (1996). The operation of control systems in large audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(2), 65-84.
80. Owhoso, V. E., Messier, W. F., Jr., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (2002). Error detection by industry-specialized teams during sequential audit review. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), 883-900.
81. Palmrose, Z. (1991). Trials of legal disputes involving independent auditors: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(Supplement), 149-185.
82. Palmrose, Z., Richardson, V. J., & Scholz, S. (2004). Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 37(1), 59-89.
83. Palmrose, Z., & Scholz, S. (2004). The circumstances and legal consequences of non-GAAP reporting: Evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(1), 139-180.
84. Payne, E. A., Ramsay, R. J., & Bamber, E. M. (2010). The effect of alternative types of review on auditors' procedures and performance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 207-220.
85. Peytcheva, M., & Gillett, P. R. (2012). Auditor perceptions of prior involvement and reputation threats as antecedents of quality threatening audit behavior. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(9), 796-820.
86. Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B. (2006). Perceived adverse consequences of quality threatening behaviour in audit firms. International Journal of Auditing, 10(1), 19-39.
87. Ponemon, L. A. (1992). Ethical reasoning and selection-socialization in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(3-4), 239-258.
88. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77(2), 97-131.
89. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2004a). Report on the 2003 limited inspection of Deloitte & Touche LLP, August 26. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://pcaobus. org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2003_Deloitte_and_Touche. pdf.
90. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2004b). Report on the 2003 limited inspection of Ernst & Young LLP, August 26. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://pcaobus. org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2003_Ernst_and_Young. pdf.
91. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2004c). Report on the 2003 limited inspection of KPMG LLP, August 26. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://pcaobus. org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2003_KPMG. pdf.
92. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2004d). Report on the 2003 limited inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, August 26. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://pcaobus. org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2003_Pricewaterhouse_Coopers. pdf.
93. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2004e). Auditing Standard No. 3: Audit documentation, June 9. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://pcaobus. org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/Auditing_Standard_3. aspx.
94. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2005). Report on the 2004 inspection of Ernst & Young LLP, November 17. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://pcaobus. org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2005_Ernst_and_Young. pdf.
95. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2007). Report on the PCAOB's 2004, 2005, and 2006 inspections of domestic triennially inspected firms, PCAOB Release No. 2007-010, October 22. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://pcaobus. org/Inspections/Documents/2007_10-22_4010_Report. pdf.
96. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2008). Report on the PCAOB's 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 inspections of domestic annually inspected firms, PCAOB Release No. 2008-008, December 5. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://pcaobus. org/Inspections/Documents/2008_12-05_Release_2008-008. pdf.
97. Rabbitt, P. (1969). Psychological refractory delay and response-stimulus interval duration in serial, choice-response tasks. Acta Psychologica, 30, 195-219.
98. Rabbitt, P. (1990). Age, IQ and awareness, and recall of errors. Ergonomics, 33(10/11), 1291-1305.
99. Ramsay, R. J. (1994). Senior/manager differences in audit workpaper review performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 127-135.
100. Reason, J. T. (2000). Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal, 320(7237), 768-770.
101. Reynolds, J. K., & Francis, J. (2000). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 30(3), 375-400.
102. Rich, J. S., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (1997). The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(5), 481-505.
103. Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Kurzbuch, A. R., & Münte, T. F. (2002). Time course of error detection and correction in humans: Neurophysiological evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(22), 9990-9996.
104. Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, J. N. (2007). Ethical climate theory, whistle-blowing, and the code of silence in police agencies in the state of Georgia. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 341-361.
105. Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., & Batinic, B. (1999). Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 527-547.
106. Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145-164). London: SAGE.
107. Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 447-479.
108. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66.
109. Sherwood, G. G. (1981). Self-serving biases in person perception: A re-examination of projection as a mechanism of defense. Psychological Bulletin, 90(3), 445-459.
110. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127-190.
111. Stefaniak, C., & Robertson, J. C. (2009). When auditors err: How mistake significance and superiors' historical reactions influence auditors' likelihood to admit a mistake. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), 41-55.
112. Tan, H.-T., & Jamal, K. (2006). Managing perceptions of technical competence: How well do auditors know how others view them? Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(3), 761-787.
113. Tan, H.-T., & Trotman, K. T. (2003). Reviewers' responses to anticipated stylization attempts by preparers of audit workpapers. The Accounting Review, 78(2), 581-604.
114. Tax, S. S., & Brown, S. W. (1998). Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75-88.
115. Taylor, E. Z., & Curtis, M. B. (2010). An examination of the layers of workplace influences in ethical judgments: Whistleblowing likelihood and perseverance in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 21-37.
116. Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859-883.
117. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A Review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951-990.
118. Tucker, A. L., & Edmondson, A. (2003). Why hospitals don't learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review, 45(2), 55-72.
119. Uribe, C. L., Schweikhart, S. B., Pathak, D. S., & March, G. B. (2002). Perceived barriers to medical-error reporting: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Healthcare Management, 47(4), 264-279.
120. van Dyck, C. (1997). Error climate and management issues: Its links to organizational performance. In R. Pepermans, A. Buelens, C. J. Vinkenburg, & P. G. W. Jensen (Eds.), Managerial behavior and practices: European research issues (pp. 107-116). Amersfoort, NL: Acco.
121. van Dyck, C. (2009). The tragic 1996 everest expedition: A tale of error culture. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 22-34.
122. van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228-1240.
123. van Leuvan, P., & Wang, M. C. (1997). An analysis of students' self-monitoring in first- and second-grade classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(3), 132-143.
124. Vardi, Y. (2001). The effects of organizational and ethical climates on misconduct at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4), 325-337.
125. Vardi, Y., & Wiener, Y. (1996). Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework. Organization Science, 7(2), 151-165.
126. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101-125.
127. Weber, J. (1990). Measuring the impact of teaching ethics to future managers: A review, assessment, and recommendations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 183-190.
128. Willett, C., & Page, M. (1996). A survey of time budget pressure and irregular auditing practices among newly qualified UK chartered accountants. British Accounting Review, 28(2), 101-120.
129. Winograd, B. N., Gerson, J. S., & Berlin, B. L. (2000). Audit practices of pricewaterhousecoopers. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 175-182.
130. Yates, J. F., & Curley, S. P. (1986). Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement. Acta Psychologica, 62(3), 293-302.
131. Zhao, B. (2011). Learning from errors: The role of context, emotion, and personality. Journal Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 435-463.
132. Zhao, B., & Olivera, F. (2006). Error reporting in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1012-1030.