Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 837-861

  Nooteboom, Sieb ^a   Quené, Hugo ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Feedback; Lexical bias; Self monitoring; SLIP technique; Speech errors

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749091772     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baars B.J. On eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In: Fromkin V.A. (Ed). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (1980), Academic Press, New York 307-317
2. Baars B.J., and Motley M.T. Spoonerisms: Experimental elicitation of human speech errors. Journal Supplement Abstract Service, Fall 1974. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 3 (1974) 28-47
3. Baars B.J., Motley M.T., and MacKay D.G. Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14 (1975) 382-391
4. Bates D. Fitting linear mixed models in R: Using the lme4 package. R News 5 (2005) 27-30
5. Blackmer E.R., and Mitton J.L. Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech. Cognition 39 (1991) 173-194
6. Costa A., Roelstraete B., and Hartsuiker R.J. The lexical bias effect in bilingual speech production: Evidence for feedback between lexical and sublexical levels across languages. Psychological Bulletin & Review 13 (2006) 612-617
7. Dell G.S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 283-321
8. Dell G.S. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 5 4 (1990) 313-349
9. Dell G.S., and Kim A.E. Speech errors and word-form encoding. In: Hartsuiker R., Bastiaanse Y., Postma A., and Wijnen F. (Eds). Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (2005), Psychology Press, Hove 17-41
10. Dell G.S., and Reich P.A. Toward a unified model of slips of the tongue. In: Fromkin V.A. (Ed). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (1980), Academic Press, New York 273-286
11. Dell G.S., and Reich P.A. Stages in sentence production: an analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20 (1981) 611-629
12. Del Viso S., Igoa J.M., and Garcia-Albea J.E. On the autonomy of phonological encoding: evidence from slips of the tongue in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20 (1991) 161-185
13. Efron B., and Tibshirami R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap (1993), Chapman & Hall, New York
14. Fromkin V.F. The nonanomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47 (1971) 27-52
15. Garrett M.F. Syntactic process in sentence production. In: Walker R.J., and Walker E.C.T. (Eds). New approaches to language mechanisms (1976), North-Holland, Amsterdam 231-256
16. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold: London.
17. Hamm S., Junglas K., and Bredenkamp J. Die Zentrale Exekutive als präartikulatorische Kontrollinstanz [The central executive as a prearticulatory control device]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 212 (2004) 66-75
18. Hartsuiker R.J. Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias?. Language and Cognitive Processes 21 (2006) 856-891
19. Hartsuiker R., Corley M., and Martensen H. The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn't fly: Related Beply to Baars, Motley, and MacKay (1975). Journal of Memory and Language 52 (2005) 58-70
20. Hosmer D.W., and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. (2000), Wiley, New York
21. Humphreys, K. (2002). Lexical bias in speech errors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
22. Laver J.D.M. The detection and correction of slips of the tongue. In: Fromkin V.A. (Ed). Speech errors as linguistic evidence (1973), Mouton, The Hague 132-143
23. Laver J.D.M. Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production. In: Fromkin V.A. (Ed). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (1980), Academic Press, New York 287-306
24. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking. From intention to articulation (1989), The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts
25. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., and Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 1-75
26. MacKay D.G. Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia 8 (1970) 323-350
27. MacKay D.G. Constraints on theories of inner speech. In: Reisberg D. (Ed). Auditory imagery (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale 274-285
28. Motley M.T., and Baars B.J. Semantic bias effects of verbal slips. Cognition 4 (1976) 177-187
29. Motley M.T., Camden C.T., and Baars B.J. Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21 (1982) 578-594
30. Nooteboom S.G. The tongue slips into patterns. In: Fromkin V.A. (Ed). Speech errors as linguistic evidence (1973), Mouton, The Hague 144-156
31. Nooteboom S.G. Listening to one-self: Monitoring speech production. In: Hartsuiker R., Bastiaanse Y., Postma A., and Wijnen F. (Eds). Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (2005), Psychology Press, Hove 167-186
32. Nooteboom S.G. Lexical bias revisited: Detecting, rejecting and repairing speech errors in inner speech. Speech Communication 47 (2005) 43-58
33. Nooteboom, S. G., & Quené, H. (in press). The SLIP technique as a window on the mental preparation of speech: Some methodological considerations. In M. J. Solé, P. Beddor & M. Ohala (Eds.), Experimental Approaches to Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (in press). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.
35. Özdemir, R., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M (in press). Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech. Cognition.
36. Özdemir, R., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (submitted for publication). The locus of phonological facilitation from spoken distractors in picture naming.
37. Pampel F.C. Logistic regression: A primer, Quantitative applications in the social sciences; 07-132 (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
38. Pinheiro J.C., and Bates D.M. Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus (2000), Springer, New York
39. Postma A. Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models. Cognition 77 (2000) 97-131
40. Quené, H. (2007). Analyzing multinomial repeated-measures data with two-stage bootstrapped logistic regression. Manuscript in preparation.
41. Quené, H., & Van den Bergh, H. H. (submitted for publication). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data.
42. Quené H., and Van den Bergh H. On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: a tutorial. Speech Communication 43 (2004) 103-121
43. Rapp B., and Goldrick M. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review 107 (2000) 460-499
44. Rapp B., and Goldrick M. Feedback by any other name is still interactivity: A reply to Roelofs (2004). Psychological Review 111 (2004) 573-578
45. Roelofs A. Comprehension-based versus production-internal feedback in planning spoken words. A rejoinder to Rapp and Goldrick (2004). Psychological Review 111 (2004) 579-580
46. Roelofs, A., Özdemir, R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (in press) Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
47. Shao J., and Tu D. The Jackknife and Bootstrap (1995), Springer, New York
48. Slevc L.R., and Ferreira V.S. Halting in single word production: A test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 515-540
49. Stemberger J.P. An interactive activation model of language production. In: Ellis A.W. (Ed). Progress in the psychology of language Vol. 1 (1985), Erlbaum, London 143-186
50. Van Alphen, P. M. (2004). Perceptual relevance of prevoicing in Dutch. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
51. Van de Velde H., Gerritsen M., and Van Hout R. De verstemlozing van de fricatieven in het Standaard-Nederlands. Een onderzoek naar taalverandering in de periode 1935-1993 [The devoicing of fricatives in Standard Dutch. An investigation of language change in the period 1935-1993]. De Nieuwe Taalgids 88 (1995) 422-445
52. Vigliocco G., and Hartsuiker R.J. The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in language production. Psychological Bulletin 128 (2002) 442-472
53. Wheeldon L.R., and Levelt W.J.M. Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 311-334