A pilot study evaluating shaved cavity margins with micro-computed tomography: A novel method for predicting lumpectomy margin status intraoperatively

Breast Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 485-489

  Tang, Rong ^a,b   Coopey, Suzanne B ^a   Buckley, Julliette M ^a   Aftreth, Owen P ^a   Fernandez, Leopoldo J ^a   Brachtel, Elena F ^a   Michaelson, James S ^a   Gadd, Michele A ^a   Specht, Michelle C ^a   Koerner, Frederick C ^a   Smith, Barbara L ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

intraoperative; micro CT; shaved cavity margin

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PILOT STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHAVED CAVITY MARGIN; SURGEON; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TUMOR VOLUME;

INTRAOPERATIVE; MICRO-CT; SHAVED CAVITY MARGIN;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PILOT PROJECTS; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84884908336     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: 15244741     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12146     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al,. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-41.
2. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al,. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1227-32.
3. Arriagada R, Lê MG, Rochard F, Contesso G,. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1558-64.
4. Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al,. Long-term results of a randomised controlled trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1143-50.
5. Obedian E, Haffty BG,. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Cancer J Sci A 2000; 6: 28-33.
6. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, et al,. The relationship be-tween microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 1994; 74: 1746-51.
7. Leong C, Boyanges J, Jayasinghe UW, et al,. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conserving therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 100: 1823-32.
8. Sahoo S, Recant WM, Jaskowiak N, et al,. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience. Breast J 2005; 11: 242-7.
9. Gupta A, Subhas G, Dubay L, et al,. Review of re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma. Am Surg 2010; 76: 731-4.
10. Sanchez C, Brem RF, McSwain AP, et al,. Factors associated with re-excision in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am Surg 2010; 76: 331-4.
11. Halasz LM, Sreedhara M, Chen YH, et al,. Improved outcomes of breast-conserving therapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 581-6.
12. Unzeitig A, Kobbermann A, Xie XJ, et al,. Influence of surgical technique on mastectomy and reexcision rates in breast-conserving therapy for cancer. Int J Surg Oncol 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/725121.
13. Coopey S, Smith BL, Hanson S, et al,. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 3797-801.
14. Chagpar A, Yen T, Sahin A, et al,. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 2003; 186: 371-7.
15. Riedl O, Fitzal F, Mader N, et al,. Intraoperative frozen section analysis for breast-conserving therapy in 1016 patients with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 264-70.
16. Cendan JC, Coco D, Copeland EM,. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 194-8.
17. Weber S, Storm FK, Stitt J, et al,. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conversation surgery. Breast J 1998; 4: 133-7.
18. Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S,. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5: 220-6.
19. D'Halluin F, Tas P, Rouquette S, et al,. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures. Breast 2009; 18: 248-53.
20. Lee CH, Carter D,. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 81-6.
21. Bathla L, Harris A, Davey M, et al,. High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery. Am J Surg 2011; 202: 387-94.
22. Goldfeder S, Davis D, Cullinan J,. Breast specimen radiography: can it predict margin status of excised breast carcinoma? Acad Radiol 2006; 13: 1453-9.
23. Paramo JC, Landeros M, McPhee MD,. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. Breast J 1999; 5: 389-94.
24. Moore MM, Whitney LA, Cerilli L, et al,. Intraoperative ultra-sound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 761-8.
25. Karni T, Pappo I, Sandbank J, et al,. A device for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 467-73.
26. Allweiss TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, et al,. A prospective, randomized,controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 483-9.
27. Pappo I, Spector R, Schindel A, et al,. Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens. J Surg Res 2010; 160: 277-81.
28. Thill M, Roder K, Diedrich K, Dittmer C,. Intraoperative assessment of surgical margins during breast conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ by use of radiofrequency spectroscopy. Breast 2011; 20: 579-80.
29. Britton PD, Sonoda LI, Yamamoto AK, et al,. Breast surgical specimen radiographs: how reliable are they? Eur J Radiol 2011; 79: 245-9.
30. Gufler H, Franke FE, Wagner S, et al,. Fine structure of breast tissue on micro computed tomography a feasibility study. Acad Radiol 2011; 18: 230-4.
31. Gufler H, Wagner S, Franke FE,. The interior structure of breast microcalcifications assessed with micro computed tomography. Acta Radiol 2011; 52: 592-6.
32. Ritman EL,. Current status of developments and applications of micro-CT. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2011; 15: 531-52.
33. Coopey SB, Buckley JM, Smith BL, et al,. Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 3036-40.
34. Jacobson AF, Asad J, Boolbol SK, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Feldman SM,. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Am J Surg 2008; 196: 556-8.
35. Cao D, Lin C, Woo S, Vang R, Tsangaris TN, Argani P,. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for re-excisions. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 1625-32.
36. Kobbermann A, Unzeitig A, Xie XJ, et al,. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1349-55.
37. Patel RR, Li T, Ross EA, Sesa L, Sigurdson ER, Bleicher RJ,. The effect of simultaneous peripheral excision in breast conservation upon margin status. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 2933-9.
38. Mook JA, Klein R, Kobberman A, et al,. Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 886-91.