Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 186, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 371-377

  Chagpar, Anees ^a   Yen, Tina ^a   Sahin, Aysegul ^b   Hunt, Kelly K ^a   Whitman, Gary J ^b   Ames, Frederick C ^a   Ross, Merrick I ^a   Meric Bernstam, Funda ^a   Babiera, Gildy V ^a   Singletary, S Eva ^a   Kuerer, Henry M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast conservation; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Intraoperative assessment; Margins

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL;

EID: 10744227387     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00264-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2003. 2003;American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.
2. Waddell B.E., Stomper P.C., DeFazio J.L., et al. Postexcision mammography is indicated after resection of ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 7:2000;665-668.
3. Solin L.J., Recht A., Fourquet A., et al. Ten-year results of breast conserving surgery and definitive radiation for intraductal carcinoma (ducal carcinoma in situ) of the breast. Cancer. 68:1991;2337-2344.
4. Silverstein M.J., Lagios M.D., Groshen S., et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 340:1999;1455-1461.
5. Douglas-Jones A.G., Logan J., Morgan J.M., et al. Effect of margins of excision on recurrence after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Pathol. 55:2002;581-586.
6. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 184:2002;383-393.
7. Cheng L., Al-Kaisi N.K., Gordon N.H., et al. Relationship between the size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 89:1997;1356-1360.
8. Neuschatz A.C., DiPetrillo T., Steinhoff M., et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer. 94:2002;1917-1924.
9. Solin L.J., Fourquet A., Vicini F.A., et al. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive irradiation long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 50:2001;991-1002.
10. Lagios M.D. Practical pathology of ductal carcinoma in situ how to derive optimal data from the pathologic examination. Silverstein M.J., Recht A., Lagios M.D. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. 2nd ed:2002;207-221 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
11. Vicini F.A., Goldstein N.S., Kestin L.L. Pathologic and technical considerations in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Ann Oncol. 10:1999;883-890.
12. Rubio I.T., Mirza N., Sahin A.A., et al. Role of specimen radiography in patients treated with skin-sparing mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 7:2000;544-548.
13. Silverstein M.J., Gierson E.D., Colburn W.J., et al. Can intraductal breast carcinoma be excised completely by local excision? Clinical and pathologic predictors. Cancer. 73:1994;2984-2989.
14. Mai K.T., Yazdi H.M., Ford J.C., Matzinger F.R.K. Predictive value of extent and grade of ductal carcinoma in situ in radiologically guided core biopsy for the status of margins in lumpectomy specimens. Eur J Surg Oncol. 26:2000;646-651.
15. Mokbel K., Choy C., Leris C., et al. Predictors of positive margins after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg. 181:2001;91-95.
16. Gajdos C., Tartter P.I., Bleiweiss I.J., et al. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics. Ann Surg. 235:2002;246-251.
17. Zafrani B., Contesso G., Eusebi V., et al. Guidelines for the pathological management of mammographically detected breast lesions. Breast. 4:1995;52-56.
18. Lee C.H., Carter D. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 164:1995;81-86.
19. Champ C.S., Mason C.H., Coghill S.B., Robinson M. A perspex grid for localization of non-palpable mammographic lesions in breast biopsies. Histopathology. 14:1989;311-315.
20. Charpin C., Bonnier P., Habib M.C., et al. X-raying of sliced surgical specimens during surgery an improvement of the histological diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions with microcalcifications. Anticancer Res. 12:1992;1737-1746.
21. Holland R. The role of specimen x-ray in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Diagn Imag Clin Med. 54:1985;178-185.
22. Gibson G.R., Lesnikoski B., Yoo J., et al. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity reexcision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 8:2001;693-704.
23. Tavassoli F.A. Specimen processing. Tavassoli F.A. Pathology of the breast. 2nd ed:1999;97-114 Appleton & Lange, Stamford.
24. Guidi A.J., Connolly J.L., Harris J.R., Schnitt S.J. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens. Cancer. 79:1997;1568-1573.
25. Klimberg V.S., Westbrook K.C., Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 5:1998;220-226.
26. Saarela A.O., Paloneva T.K., Rissanen T.J., Kiviniemi H.O. Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer a prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology. J Surg Oncol. 66:1997;248-253.
27. Anscher M.S., Jones P., Prosnitz L.R., et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Ann Surg. 218:1993;22-28.
28. Solin L.J., Fowble B.L., Schultz D.J., Goodman R.L. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 21:1991;279-287.
29. Assersohn L., Powles T.J., Ashley S., et al. Local relapse in primary breast cancer patients with unexcised positive surgical margins after lumpectomy, radiotherapy and chemoendocrine therapy. Ann Oncol. 10:1999;1451-1455.