A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 196, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 483-489

  Allweis, Tanir M ^a   Kaufman, Zvi ^b   Lelcuk, Shlomo ^c   Pappo, Itzhak ^d   Karni, Tami ^d   Schneebaum, Shlomo ^e   Spector, Rona ^c   Schindel, Asher ^c   Hershko, Dan ^f   Zilberman, Moshe ^g   Sayfan, Joel ^h   Berlin, Yuri ^h   Hadary, Amram ⁱ   Olsha, Oded ^j   Paran, Haim ^b   Gutman, Mordechai ^b   Carmon, Moshe ^j  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b MEIR MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^c RABIN MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^d ASSAF HAROFEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^e TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^f RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^g BARUCH PADEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^h HAEMEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

ⁱ Rebecca Sieff Government Hospital   (Israel)

^j SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

more..

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Intraoperative margin assessment; Lumpectomy; Positive margins; Surgical margins

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SAFETY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 52249085654     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Newman L.A., and Washington T.A. New trends in breast conservation therapy. Surg Clin North Am 83 (2003) 841-883
2. Morrow M., Strom E.A., Bassett L.W., et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52 (2002) 277-300
3. Gentilini O., Intra M., Gandini S., et al. Ipsilateral breast tumor reappearance in patients treated with conservative surgery after primary chemotherapy. The role of surgical margins on outcome. J Surg Oncol 94 (2006) 375-379
4. Smitt M.C., Nowels K., Carlson R.W., et al. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003) 979-985
5. Huston T.L., and Simmons R.M. Locally recurrent breast cancer after conservation therapy. Am J Surg 189 (2005) 229-235
6. Leong C., Boyages J., Jayasinghe U.W., et al. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer 100 (2004) 1823-1832
7. McCready D.R. Keeping abreast of marginal controversies. Ann Surg Oncol 11 (2004) 885-887
8. Tafra L., Fine R., Whitworth P., et al. Prospective randomized study comparing cryo-assisted and needle-wire localization of ultrasound visible breast tumors. Am J Surg 192 (2006) 462-470
9. Menes T.S., Tartter P.A., Bleiweiss I., et al. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 12 (2005) 1-5
10. McLaughlin S.A., Ochoa-Frongia L.M., Patil S.M., et al. Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 206 (2008) 76-82
11. Mullenix P.S., Cuadrado D.G., Steele S.R., et al. Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg 187 (2004) 643-646
12. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology 2007. National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
13. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer with breast conservation surgery. Am J Surg 184 (2002) 383-393
14. Taghian A., Mohiuddin M., Jagsi R., et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey. Ann Surg 241 (2005) 629-639
15. Silverstein M.J., Lagios M.D., Groshen S., et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 340 (1999) 1455-1461
16. Chagpar A., Yen T., Sahin A., et al. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma is situ treated with breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg 186 (2003) 371-377
17. Keskek M., Kotharia M., Ardehalia B., et al. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30 (2004) 1058-1064
18. Cabioglu N., Hunt K.K., Sahin A.A., et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007) 1458-1471
19. Klimberg V.S., Harms S., and Korourian S. Assessing margin status. Surg Oncol 8 (1999) 77-84
20. Karni T., Pappo I., Sandbank J., et al. A device for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery. Am J Surg 194 (2007) 467-473