Intraoperative frozen section analysis for breast-conserving therapy in 1016 patients with breast cancer

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 264-270

  Riedl, O ^d   Fitzal, F ^a   Mader, N ^b   Dubsky, P ^a   Rudas, M ^a   Mittlboeck, M ^c   Gnant, M ^a   Jakesz, R ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b SALK   (Austria)

^c Core Unit for Medical Statistics and Informatics ^*

^d LKH Krems   (Austria)

Author keywords

Breast conserving therapy; Frozen section analysis; Intraoperative management

Indexed keywords

DOCETAXEL; EPIRUBICIN;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE CYCLE TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LOGISTIC MODELS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 59649121924     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: 15322157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aziz D., Rawlinson E., Narod S.A., et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J 12 (2006) 331-337
2. Fitzal F., and Gnant M. Breast conservation: evolution of surgical strategies. Breast J 12 (2006) S165-S173
3. Ferreiro J.A., Gisvold J.J., and Bostwick D.G. Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis of mammographically directed breast biopsies. Results of 1490 consecutive cases. Am J Surg Pathol 19 (1995) 1267-1271
4. Fessia L., Ghiringhello B., Arisio R., Botta G., and Aimone V. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in breast cancer detection. A review of 4436 biopsies and comparison with cytodiagnosis. Pathol Res Pract 179 (1984) 61-66
5. Weber S., Storm F.K., Stitt J., and Mahvi D.M. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery. Cancer J Sci Am 3 (1997) 273-277
6. Sauter E.R., Hoffman J.P., Ottery F.D., et al. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions. An evaluation of frozen section biopsy in 4434 cases. Cancer 73 (1994) 2607-2612
7. Niemann T.H., Lucas J.G., and Marsh Jr. W.L. To freeze or not to freeze. A comparison of methods for the handling of breast biopsies with no palpable abnormality. Am J Clin Pathol 106 (1996) 225-228
8. Cendan J.C., Coco D., and Copeland III E.M. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 201 (2005) 194-198
9. Huston T.L., Pigalarga R., Osborne M.P., and Tousimis E. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 192 (2006) 509-512
10. Schmidt-Ullrich R., Wazer D.E., Tercilla O., et al. Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17 (1989) 733-738
11. McLaughlin S.A., Ochoa-Frongia L.M., Patil S.M., Cody III H.S., and Sclafani L.M. Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 206 (2008) 76-82
12. Cochrane R.A., Valasiadou P., Wilson A.R., Al-Ghazal S.K., and Macmillan R.D. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 90 (2003) 1505-1509
13. Bianchi S., Palli D., Ciatto S., et al. Accuracy and reliability of frozen section diagnosis in a series of 672 nonpalpable breast lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 103 (1995) 199-205
14. Guski H., Winzer K.J., Aldinger H.U., Frohberg H.D., and Bick U. Possibilities and limits of diagnostic frozen section in breast carcinoma. Zentralbl Chir 123 (1998) 19-22
15. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Immediate management of mammographically detected breast lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 17 (1993) 850-851
16. Fechner R.E. Frozen section examination of breast biopsies. Practice parameter. Am J Clin Pathol 103 (1995) 6-7
17. Cheng L., Al-Kaisi N.K., Liu A.Y., and Gordon N.H. The results of intraoperative consultations in 181 ductal carcinomas in situ of the breast. Cancer 80 (1997) 75-79
18. Fechner R.E. Frozen section (intraoperative consultation). Hum Pathol 19 (1988) 999-1000
19. Sickles E.A. Breast masses: mammographic evaluation. Radiology 173 (1989) 297-303
20. Helbich T.H., Matzek W., and Fuchsjager M.H. Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 14 (2004) 383-393
21. Steger G., Kubista E., Hausmaninger H., et al. 6 vs. 3 cycles of epirubicin/docetaxel +G-CSF in operable breast cancer: results of ABCSG-14. J Clin Oncol 22 (2004) 553
22. Mamounas E.P. Overview of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project neoadjuvant chemotherapy studies. Semin Oncol 25 (1998) 31-35
23. Veronesi U., Paganelli G., Viale G., et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 546-553
24. Bloom H.J., and Richardson W.W. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 11 (1957) 359-377
25. Reiner A., Neumeister B., Spona J., Reiner G., Schemper M., and Jakesz R. Immunocytochemical localization of estrogen and progesterone receptor and prognosis in human primary breast cancer. Cancer Res. 50 (1990) 7057-7061
26. Jeong H.J., Lee K.K., and Choi I.J. Frozen-section indications, limitations, and accuracy. Kor J Pathol 19 (1985) 45-50
27. Van Limbergen E., Rijnders A., van der Schueren E., Lerut T., Christiaens R., and Van Tongelen K. Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 2. A quantitative analysis of the influence of radiation dose, fractionation schedules and surgical treatment techniques on cosmetic results. Radiother Oncol 16 (1989) 253-267
28. Van Limbergen E., van der Schueren E., and Van Tongelen K. Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system. Radiother Oncol 16 (1989) 159-167
29. Rose M.A., Olivotto I., Cady B., et al. Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Long-term cosmetic results. Arch Surg 124 (1989) 153-157
30. Wazer D.E., DiPetrillo T., Schmidt-Ullrich R., et al. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 10 (1992) 356-363
31. Cabioglu N., Hunt K.K., Sahin A.A., et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007) 1458-1471
32. Chagpar A., Yen T., Sahin A., et al. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 186 (2003) 371-377
33. Pinotti J.A., and Carvalho F.M. Intraoperative pathological monitorization of surgical margins: a method to reduce recurrences after conservative treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23 (2002) 11-16
34. Balch G.C., Mithani S.K., Simpson J.F., and Kelley M.C. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg 71 (2005) 22-27 (discussion 27-8)
35. Klimberg V.S., Harms S., and Korourian S. Assessing margin status. Surg Oncol 8 (1999) 77-84
36. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists. The management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). CMAJ 158 (1998) S27-S34
37. Oberman H.A. A modest proposal. Am J Surg Pathol. 16 (1992) 69-70
38. Tinnemans J.G., Wobbes T., Holland R., et al. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165 (1987) 523-529
39. Agnantis N.J., Apostolikas N., Christodoulou I., Petrakis C., and Garas J. The reliability of frozen-section diagnosis in various breast lesions: a study based on 3451 biopsies. Recent Results Cancer Res 90 (1984) 205-210
40. Hwang T.S., Ham E.K., Kim C.W., et al. An evaluation of frozen section biopsy in 4434 cases. J Kor Med Sci 2 (1987) 239-245
41. Rosen P.P. Frozen section diagnosis of breast lesions. Recent experience with 556 consecutive biopsies. Ann Surg 187 (1978) 17-19
42. van der Hage J.A., van de Velde C.J., Julien J.P., Tubiana-Hulin M., Vandervelden C., and Duchateau L. Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. J Clin Oncol 19 (2001) 4224-4237
43. Olson T.P., Harter J., Munoz A., Mahvi D.M., and Breslin T. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007) 2953-2960