The effect of simultaneous peripheral excision in breast conservation upon margin status

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2933-2939

  Patel, Roshani R ^a   Li, Tianyu ^a   Ross, Eric A ^a   Sesa, Linda ^a   Sigurdson, Elin R ^a   Bleicher, Richard J ^a  

^a FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CONSERVATION SURGERY; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER INVASION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SURGERY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPHERAL SEGMENT EXCISION; RECURRENCE RISK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 78049471673     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1123-z     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ER Fisher J Dignam E Tan-Chiu J Costantino B Fisher S Paik, et al. 1999 Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17: intraductal carcinoma Cancer. 86 429 438 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzlslehsg%3D%3D 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<429:: AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-Y 10430251 (Pubitemid 29347405)
2. JA van Dongen AC Voogd IS Fentiman, et al. 2000 Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial J Natl Cancer Inst. 92 1143 1150 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143 10904087
3. I Besana-Ciani MJ Greenall 2008 The importance of margins status after breast conservative surgery and radiotherapy in node positive patients: a follow-up of 10-15 years Int Semin Surg Oncol. 5 13 10.1186/1477-7800-5-13 18498621 (Pubitemid 351803152)
4. C Dunne JP Burke M Morrow MR Kell 2009 Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ J Clin Oncol. 27 1615 1620 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5182 19255332
5. A Taghian M Mohiuddin R Jagsi S Goldberg E Ceilley S Powell 2005 Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey Ann Surg. 241 629 639 10.1097/01.sla.0000157272.04803.1b 15798465 (Pubitemid 40397311)
6. TS Menes PI Tartter I Bleiweiss JH Godbold A Estabrook SR Smith 2005 The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients Ann Surg Oncol. 12 881 885 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.021 16195834 (Pubitemid 41504220)
7. G Freedman B Fowble A Hanlon N Nicolaou D Fein J Hoffman, et al. 1999 Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 44 1005 1015 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzksl2jsw%3D%3D 10421533
8. MJ O'Sullivan T Li G Freedman M Morrow 2007 The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery Ann Surg Oncol. 14 3133 3140 10.1245/s10434-007-9523-4 17653798 (Pubitemid 47594283)
9. DE Wazer T DiPetrillo R Schmidt-Ullrich L Weld TJ Smith DJ Marchant, et al. 1992 Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma J Clin Oncol. 10 356 363 1:STN:280:DyaK387ls1ylsw%3D%3D 1445509
10. SE Singletary 2002 Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy Am J Surg. 184 383 393 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01012-7 12433599 (Pubitemid 35335942)
11. R Ramanah X Pivot JL Sautiere R Maillet D Riethmuller 2008 Predictors of re-excision for positive or close margins in breast-conservation therapy for pT1 tumors Am J Surg. 195 770 774 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.052 18394582 (Pubitemid 351749454)
12. MR Bani MP Lux K Heusinger E Wenkel A Magener R Schulz-Wendtland, et al. 2009 Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy Eur J Surg Oncol. 35 32 37 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FgtVGqtg%3D%3D 18539425
13. MS Sabel K Rogers K Griffith R Jagsi CG Kleer KA Diehl, et al. 2009 Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins J Surg Oncol. 99 99 103 10.1002/jso.21215 19065638
14. N Cabioglu KK Hunt AA Sahin HM Kuerer GV Babiera SE Singletary, et al. 2007 Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery Ann Surg Oncol. 14 1458 1471 10.1245/s10434-006-9236-0 17260108 (Pubitemid 46536814)
15. M Keskek M Kothari B Ardehali N Betambeau N Nasiri GP Gui 2004 Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol. 30 1058 1064 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crltVOmtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.07.019 15522551 (Pubitemid 40267809)
16. AB Chagpar RC Martin 2nd LJ Hagendoorn C Chao KM McMasters 2004 Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique Am J Surg. 188 399 402 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.020 15474434 (Pubitemid 39330544)
17. I Gage SJ Schnitt AJ Nixon B Silver A Recht SL Troyan, et al. 1996 Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy Cancer. 78 1921 1928 1:STN:280: DyaK2s%2FmsFygsw%3D%3D 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<1921::AID- CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-# 8909312 (Pubitemid 26360575)
18. CC Park M Mitsumori A Nixon A Recht J Connolly R Gelman, et al. 2000 Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence J Clin Oncol. 18 1668 1675 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3islOquw%3D%3D 10764427
19. JF Waljee ES Hu LA Newman AK Alderman 2008 Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer Ann Surg Oncol. 15 1297 1303 10.1245/s10434-007-9777-x 18259820
20. D Cao C Lin SH Woo R Vang TN Tsangaris P Argani 2005 Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions Am J Surg Pathol. 29 1625 1632 10.1097/01.pas. 0000180448.08203.70 16327435
21. AF Jacobson J Asad SK Boolbol MP Osborne K Boachie-Adjei SM Feldman 2008 Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Am J Surg. 196 556 558 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007 18809063
22. RR White TJ Halperin JA Olson Jr MS Soo RC Bentley HF Seigler 2001 Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities Ann Surg. 233 769 777 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3nslGksg%3D%3D 10.1097/00000658-200106000-00006 11371735 (Pubitemid 32494557)
23. TL Huston R Pigalarga MP Osborne E Tousimis 2006 The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery Am J Surg. 192 509 512 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.021 16978962 (Pubitemid 44344190)
24. L Liberman J Kaplan KJ Van Zee EA Morris LR LaTrenta AF Abramson, et al. 2001 Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization AJR Am J Roentgenol. 177 565 572 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvntFKrtg%3D%3D 11517048
25. H Mumtaz MA Hall-Craggs T Davidson K Walmsley W Thurell MW Kissin I Taylor 1997 Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging AJR Am J Roentgenol. 169 417 424 1:STN:280:DyaK2szos1Kmtw%3D%3D 9242745
26. Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180-7; quiz 294-5.
27. N Hwang DE Schiller P Crystal E Maki DR McCready 2009 Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: Its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy Ann Surg Oncol. 16 3000 3009 10.1245/s10434-009-0607-1 19603233
28. EW Gould PG Robinson 1992 The pathologist's examination of the "lumpectomy"-The pathologists' view of surgical margins Semin Surg Oncol. 8 129 135 1:STN:280:DyaK38zlvVSnsA%3D%3D 1496222
29. R Holland JL Connolly R Gelman M Mravunac JH Hendriks AL Verbeek, et al. 1990 The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast J Clin Oncol. 8 113 118 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7htFOktA%3D%3D 2153190
30. M Noguchi M Minami M Earashi T Taniya II Miyazaki Y Mizukami, et al. 1995 Pathologic assessment of surgical margins on frozen and permanent sections in breast conserving surgery Breast Cancer. 2 27 33 10.1007/BF02966893 11091529
31. TP Olson J Harter A Munoz DM Mahvi T Breslin 2007 Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence Ann Surg Oncol. 14 2953 2960 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srmtV2ksg%3D%3D 10.1245/s10434-007-9437-1 17674109 (Pubitemid 47460626)
32. VS Klimberg KC Westbrook S Korourian 1998 Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol. 5 220 226 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mvVKgug%3D%3D 10.1007/BF02303776 9607622 (Pubitemid 28249311)
33. CE Cox NN Ku DS Reintgen HM Greenberg SV Nicosia S Wangensteen 1991 Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation Arch Surg. 126 490 493 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7otF2qtw%3D%3D 2009065
34. EK Valdes SK Boolbol I Ali SM Feldman JM Cohen 2007 Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 14 2940 2945 10.1245/s10434-007- 9364-1 17632761 (Pubitemid 47460618)
35. T Karni I Pappo J Sandbank O Lavon V Kent R Spector, et al. 2007 A device for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery Am J Surg. 194 467 473 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.013 17826057 (Pubitemid 47361045)
36. SJ Schnitt JL Connolly 1992 Processing and evaluation of breast excision specimens.A clinically oriented approach Am J Clin Pathol. 98 125 137 1:STN:280:DyaK38zht1Gltg%3D%3D 1615916
37. MA Molina S Snell D Franceschi M Jorda C Gomez FL Moffat, et al. 2009 Breast specimen orientation Ann Surg Oncol. 16 285 288 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M7gsl2iuw%3D%3D 10.1245/s10434-008-0245-z 19050966
38. WC Dooley J Parker 2005 Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins Am J Surg. 190 606 608 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.023 16164932 (Pubitemid 41306087)
39. R Clingan M Griffin J Phillips W Coberly W Jennings 2003 Potential margin distortion in breast tissue by specimen mammography Arch Surg. 138 1371 1374 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1371 14662542 (Pubitemid 37499399)
40. RA Graham MJ Homer J Katz J Rothschild H Safaii S Supran 2002 The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer Am J Surg. 184 89 93 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00902-9 12169349 (Pubitemid 34880211)
41. IL Wapnir SJ Anderson EP Mamounas CE Geyer Jr JH Jeong E Tan-Chiu, et al. 2006 Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials J Clin Oncol. 24 2028 2037 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3273 16648502 (Pubitemid 46622111)
42. SJ Schnitt A Abner R Gelman JL Connolly A Recht RB Duda, et al. 1994 The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy Cancer 74 1746 1751 1:STN:280:DyaK2czmtlKgsQ%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1746::AID-CNCR2820740617>3.0.CO;2-Y 8082077 (Pubitemid 24301829)