Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: A series of 400 procedures

Breast

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 248-253

  D'Halluin, François ^a,b   Tas, Patrick ^a   Rouquette, Sophie ^a,b   Bendavid, Cécile ^a   Foucher, Fabrice ^a,b   Meshba, Habiba ^a   Blanchot, Jérôme ^a   Coué, Olivier ^a   Levêque, Jean ^a,b  

^a Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center   (France)

^b RENNES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Breast conservation; Frozen section; Imprint cytology; Intra operative margin assessment

Indexed keywords

PARAFFIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAOPERATIVE TOUCH PREPARATION CYTOLOGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATING ROOM; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; EPITHELIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PARAFFIN EMBEDDING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 69749111472     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anonymous. The national institutes of health consensus development conference on treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Consens Statement 8 6 (1990) 1-19
2. Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J., Margolese R.G., Deutsch M., Fisher E.R., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 16 (2002) 1233-1241
3. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L., Greco M., Saccozzi R., Luini A., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 16 (2002) 1227-1232
4. Schnitt S.J. Risk factors for local recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer and negative surgical margins of excision. Where are we and where are we going?. Am J Clin Pathol 120 4 (2003) 485-488
5. Horst K.C., Smitt M.C., Goffinet D.R., and Carlson R.W. Predictors of local recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Clin Breast Cancer 5 6 (2005) 425-438
6. Cardoso M.J., Cardoso J., Amaral N., Azevedo I., Barreau L., Bernardo M., et al. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast 16 5 (2007) 456-461
7. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184 5 (2002) 383-393
8. Aziz D., Rawlinson E., Narod S.A., Sun P., Lickley H.L., McCready D.R., et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J 12 4 (2006) 331-337
9. O'Sullivan M.J., Li T., Freedman G., and Morrow M. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14 11 (2007) 3133-3140
10. Camp E.R., McAuliffe P.F., Gilroy J.S., Morris C.G., Lind D.S., Mendenhall N.P., et al. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance. J Am Coll Surg 201 6 (2005) 855-861
11. Cendan J.C., Coco D., and Copeland III E.M. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 201 2 (2005) 194-198
12. Freedman G., Fowble B., Hanlon A., Nicolaou N., Fein D., Hoffman J., et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44 5 (1999) 1005-1015
13. Cavallaro U., and Christofori G. Cell adhesion in tumor invasion and metastasis: loss of the glue is not enough. Biochim Biophys Acta 1552 1 (2001) 39-45
14. Cabioglu N., Hunt K.K., Sahin A.A., Kuerer H.M., Babiera G.V., Singletary S.E., et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14 4 (2007) 1458-1471
15. Miller A.R., Brandao G., Prihoda T.J., Hill C., Cruz Jr. A.B., and Yeh I.T. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol 86 3 (2004) 134-140
16. Papa M.Z., Zippel D., Koller M., Klein E., Chetrit A., and Ari G.B. Positive margins of breast biopsy: is reexcision always necessary?. J Surg Oncol 70 3 (1999) 167-171
17. Noguchi M., Minami M., Earashi M., Taniya T., Miyazaki II, Mizukami Y., et al. Pathologic Assessment of surgical margins on frozen and permanent sections in breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer 2 1 (1995) 27-33
18. Sauter E.R., Hoffman J.P., Ottery F.D., Kowalyshyn M.J., Litwin S., and Eisenberg B.L. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions. Cancer 73 10 (1994) 2607-2612
19. Weber S., Storm F.K., Stitt J., and Mahvi D.M. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery. Cancer J Sci Am 3 5 (1997) 273-277
20. Gould E.W., and Robinson P.G. The pathologist's examination of the "lumpectomy" - the pathologist's view of surgical margins. Semin Surg Oncol 8 3 (1992) 129-135
21. England D.W., Chan S.Y., Stonelake P.S., and Lee M.J. Assessment of excision margins following wide local excision for breast carcinoma using specimen scrape cytology and tumour bed biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 20 4 (1994) 425-429
22. Cox C.E., Ku N.N., Reintgen D.S., Greenberg H.M., Nicosia S.V., and Wangensteen S. Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation. Arch Surg 126 4 (1991) 490-493
23. Bakhshandeh M., Tutuncuoglu S.O., Fischer G., and Masood S. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients. Diagn Cytopathol 35 10 (2007) 656-659
24. Creager A.J., Shaw J.A., Young P.R., and Geisinger K.R. Intraoperative evaluation of lumpectomy margins by imprint cytology with histologic correlation: a community hospital experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med 126 7 (2002) 846-848
25. Klimberg V.S., Westbrook K.C., and Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 5 3 (1998) 220-226
26. Muttalib M., Tai C.C., Briant-Evans T., Maheswaran I., Livni N., Shousha S., et al. Intra-operative assessment of excision margins using breast imprint and scrape cytology. Breast 14 1 (2005) 42-50
27. Valdes E.K., Boolbol S.K., Cohen J.M., and Feldman S.M. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology: does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?. Ann Surg Oncol 14 3 (2007) 1045-1050
28. Saarela A.O., Paloneva T.K., Rissanen T.J., and Kiviniemi H.O. Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: a prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology. J Surg Oncol 66 4 (1997) 248-253
29. Cox C.E., Pendas S., Ku N.N., Reintgen D.S., Greenberg H.S., and Nicosia S.V. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins. Am Surg 64 6 (1998) 533-537 discussion 537-8
30. Blair S.L., Wang-Rodriguez J., Cortes-Mateos M.J., Messmer D., Sandoval S., Messmer B., et al. Enhanced touch preps improve the ease of interpretation of intraoperative breast cancer margins. Am Surg 73 10 (2007) 973-976
31. Chagpar A.B., Martin II R.C., Hagendoorn L.J., Chao C., and McMasters K.M. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg 188 4 (2004) 399-402
32. Tartter P.I., Kaplan J., Bleiweiss I., Gajdos C., Kong A., Ahmed S., et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 179 2 (2000) 81-85
33. Helpap B., and Tschubel K. The significance of the imprint cytology in breast biopsy diagnosis. Acta Cytol 22 3 (1978) 133-137
34. Suen K.C., Wood W.S., Syed A.A., Quenville N.F., and Clement P.B. Role of imprint cytology in intraoperative diagnosis: value and limitations. J Clin Pathol 31 4 (1978) 328-337
35. Ikeda T., Enomoto K., Wada K., Takeshima K., Yoneyama K., Furukawa J., et al. Frozen-section-guided breast-conserving surgery: implications of diagnosis by frozen section as a guide to determining the extent of resection. Surg Today 27 3 (1997) 207-212
36. Tohnosu N., Nabeya Y., Matsuda M., Akutsu N., Watanabe Y., Sato H., et al. Rapid intraoperative scrape cytology assessment of surgical margins in breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 5 2 (1998) 165-169
37. Olson T.P., Harter J., Munoz A., Mahvi D.M., and Breslin T. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 14 10 (2007) 2953-2960
38. Pinotti J.A., and Carvalho F.M. Intraoperative pathological monitorization of surgical margins: a method to reduce recurrences after conservative treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23 1 (2002) 11-16
39. Swart G.J., Wright C., Brundyn K., Mansvelt E., du Plessis M., ten Oever D., et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Transfus Apheresis Sci 37 1 (2007) 71-79