Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 886-891

  Mook, Julie ^a   Klein, Rebecca ^a   Kobbermann, Anne ^a   Unzeitig, Alison ^a   Euhus, David ^a   Peng, Yan ^a   Sarode, Venetia ^a   Moldrem, Amy ^a   Leitch, A Marilyn ^a   Andrews, Valerie ^a   Teotia, Sumeet ^a   Rao, Roshni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CAVITY SHAVE MARGIN TECHNIQUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETIC SURGERY; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE SLICE; TUMOR VOLUME; BREAST TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84862263347     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1982-y     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Morrow M, White J, Moughan J, Owen J, Pajack T, Sylvester J, et al. Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2254-62. (Pubitemid 32366978)
2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233-41. (Pubitemid 35176242)
3. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227-32. (Pubitemid 35176241)
4. Gibson GR, Lesnikoski BA, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth RJ, Jr. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity reexcision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693-704. (Pubitemid 32952483)
5. Jacobson AF, Asad J, Boolbol SK, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Feldman SM. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Am J Surg. 2008;196:556-8.
6. Hewes JC, Imkampe A, Haji A, Bates T. Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:47-53.
7. Tengher-Barna I, Hequet D, Reboul-Marty J, Frassati-Biaggi A, Seince N, Rodrigues-Faure A, et al. Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:299-305.
8. Janes SE, Stankhe M, Singh S, Isgar B. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2006;15:326-30. (Pubitemid 43812228)
9. Marudanayagam R, Singhal R, Tanchel B, O'Connor B, Balasubramanian B, Paterson I. Effect of cavity shaving on reoperation rate following breast-conserving surgery. Breast J. 2008;14:570-3.
10. Kobbermann A, Unzeitig A, Xie XJ, Yan J, Euhus D, Peng Y, et al. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer reexcision rates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1349-55.
11. Chan SW, Cheung PS, Lam SH. Cosmetic outcome and percentage of breast volume excision in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. World J Surg. 2010;34:1447-52.
12. Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505-9. (Pubitemid 37533166)
13. Olivotto IA, Rose MA, Osteen RT, Love S, Cady B, Silver B, et al. Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:747-53. (Pubitemid 19250527)
14. Taylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ, Kuske RR, Philpott GW, Garcia DM, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:753-64.
15. Vrieling C, Collette L, Bartelink E, Borger JH, Brenninkmeyer SJ, Horiot JC, et al. Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45: 667-76.
16. Rose MA, Olivotto I, Cady B, Koufman C, Osteen R, Silver B, et al. Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Long-term cosmetic results. Arch Surg. 1989;124:153-7. (Pubitemid 19059735)
17. Krekel NM, Zonderhuis BM, Stockmann HB, Schreurs WH, van der Veen H, de Lange de Klerk ES, et al. A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:109-15.
18. Krekel NM, Zonderhuis BM, Schreurs HW, Cardozo AM, Rijna H, van der Veen H, et al. Ultrasound-guided breast-sparing surgery to improve cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. A prospective multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided surgery to traditional palpation-guided surgery (COBALT trial). BMC Surg. 2011;11:8.