How Values Shape and Are Shaped by Nonprofit and Voluntary Organizations: The Current State of the Field

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 856-885

  Chen, Katherine K ^a   Lune, Howard ^b   Queen II, Edward L ^c  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

bureaucracy; collectivist; democracy; logics; values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884844606     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0899764013480273     Document Type: Article

References (219)

1. Abrahamson E.,Fairchild G.Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999;44:708-740.
2. Acker J.Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations.Gender & Society. 1990;4:139-158.
3. Acker J.Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations.Gender & Society. 2006;20:441-464.
4. Aldrich H. E.,Ruef M.Organizations evolving. 2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006:.
5. Allahyari R. A.Visions of charity: Volunteer workers and moral communities. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000:.
6. Amirkhanyan A. A.,Kim H. J.,Lambright K. T.Faith-based assumptions about performance: Does church affiliation matter for service quality and access?.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2009;38:490-521.
7. Arnove R. F.Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1982:.
8. Ashcraft K. L.Organized dissonance: Feminist bureaucracy as hybrid form.Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44:1301-1322.
9. Austin J. E.,Seitanidi M. M.Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part 1: Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2012a;41:726-758.
10. Austin J. E.,Seitanidi M. M.Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2012b;41:929-968.
11. Bacharach S. B.,Bamberger P. A.,Sonnensthul W. J.Mutual aid and union renewal: Cycles of logics of action. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2001:.
12. Baggett J. P.Habitat for Humanity: Building private homes, building public religion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 2000:.
13. Baggetta M.Civic opportunities in associations: Interpersonal interaction, governance experience, and institutional relationships.Social Forces. 2009;88:175-200.
14. Barker J. R.Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1993;38:408-437.
15. Barker J. R.The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999:.
16. Barley S. R.Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for Organization Studies.Organization Studies. 2010;31:777-805.
17. Barnard C. I.The functions of the executive. 1968). The functions of the executive (30th Anniversary ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1938)Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1968:.
18. Becker P. E.Making inclusive communities: Congregations and the "problem" of race.Social Problems. 1998;45:451-472.
19. Becker P. E.Congregations in conflict: Cultural models of local religious life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
20. BeckerH. S. (2009). How to find out how to do qualitative research. Retrieved from http://home.earthlink.net/~hsbecker/articles/NSF.html.
21. Beeman J.,Guberman N.,Lamoureux J.,Fournier D.,Gervais L.Beyond structures to democracy as culture.American Behavioral Scientist. 2009;52:867-884.
22. Benkler Y.The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2006:.
23. BerrettD. (2011, October16). Intellectual roots of Wall St. protest lie in academe: Movement's principles arise from scholarship on anarchy. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Intellectual-Roots-of-Wall/129428.
24. Binder A.For love and money: Organizations' creative responses to multiple environmental logics.Theory and Society. 2007;36:547-571.
25. Boltanski L.,Chiapello ÈThe new spirit of capitalism. London, UK: Verso; 2005:.
26. Bordt R. L.How alternative ideas become institutions: The case of feminist collectives.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 1997;26:132-155.
27. Brecher J.Banded together: Economic democratization in the Brass Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 2011:.
28. Breines W.Community and organization in the New Left: 1962-1968: The great refusal. New York, NY: Praeger; 1982:.
29. Bruns A.Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang; 2008:.
30. Burawoy M.Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1979:.
31. Burawoy M.The extended case method.Sociological Theory. 1998;16 (1): 4-33.
32. Bushouse B. K.Universal preschool: Policy change, stability, and the Pew Charitable Trusts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2009:.
33. Cameron K. S.,Quinn R. E.Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1999:.
34. Chaves M.,Wineburg R.Did the faith-based initiative change congregations?.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2010;39:343-355.
35. Chen K. K.Enabling creative chaos: The organization behind the Burning Man event. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2009:.
36. Chen K. K.Lessons for creative cities from Burning Man: How organizations can sustain and disseminate a creative context.City, Culture and Society. 2011;2 (2): 93-100.
37. Chen K. K.Artistic prosumption: Cocreative destruction at Burning Man.American Behavioral Scientist. 2012a;56:570-595.
38. Chen K. K.Charismatizing the routine: Storytelling for meaning and agency in the Burning Man organization.Qualitative Sociology. 2012b;35:311-334.
39. Chen K. K.Laboring for the Man: Augmenting authority in a voluntary association.Research in the Sociology of Organizations. 2012c;34:135-164.
40. Chen K. K.Storytelling: An Informal Mechanism of Accountability for Voluntary Organizations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:902-922.
41. Chen K. K.,O'Mahony S.Differentiating organizational boundaries.Research in the Sociology of Organizations. 2009;26:183-220.
42. Chetkovich C. A.,Kunreuther F.From the ground up: Grassroots organizations making social change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University; 2006:.
43. Chin J. J.The limits and potential of nonprofit organizations in participatory planning: A case study of the New York HIV Planning Council.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2009;31:431-460.
44. Clegg S. R.Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world. London, UK: Sage; 1990:.
45. Cohen M. D.,March J. G.,Olsen J. P.A garbage can model of organizational choice.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1972;17 (1): 1-25.
46. Colwell M. A. C.Private foundations and public policy: The political role of philanthropy. New York, NY: Garland; 1993:.
47. Crozier M.The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1964:.
48. Curtis R. L.,Zurcher L. A.Social movements: An analytical exploration of organizational forms.Social Problems. 1974;21:356-370.
49. Social movements and organization theory. Davis G.McAdam D.Scott W. R.Zald M., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
50. De Cooman R.,De Gieter S.,Pepermans R.,Jegers M.A cross-sector comparison of motivation-related concepts in for-profit and not-for-profit service organizations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2011;40:296-317.
51. della Porta D.Making the polis: Social forums and democracy in the global justice movement.Mobilization. 2005;10 (1): 73-94.
52. DiMaggio P. J.,Powell W. W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review. 1983;48:147-160.
53. Doerr N.Deliberative discussion, language, and efficiency in the World Social Forum process.Mobilization. 2008;13:395-410.
54. Eikenberry A. M.Giving circles: Philanthropy, voluntary association, and democracy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2009a:.
55. Eikenberry A. M.Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2009b;38:582-596.
56. Eliasoph N.Making volunteers: Civic life after welfare's end. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2011:.
57. Elsbach K. D.,Sutton R. I.Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories.Academy of Management Journal. 1992;35:699-738.
58. Fligstein N.,McAdam D.Toward a general theory of strategic action fields.Sociological Theory. 2011;29 (1): 1-26.
59. Forte A.,Larco V.,Bruckman A.Decentralization in Wikipedia governance.Journal of Management Information Systems. 2009;26 (1): 49-72.
60. Foucault M.Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Gordon C., ed. New York, NY: Pantheon Books; 1980:109-133.
61. Friedland R.The endless fields of Pierre Bourdieu.Organization. 2009;16:887-917.
62. Friedland R.,Alford R. R.The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991:232-263.
63. Frumkin P.,Andre-Clark A.When missions, markets, and politics collide: Values and strategy in the nonprofit human services.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2000;29:141-163.
64. Fung A.Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004:.
65. Gitlin T.Occupy nation: The roots, the spirit, and the promise of Occupy Wall Street. New York, NY: HarperCollins; 2012:.
66. Giving USA Foundation. (2011). Giving USA 2011: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2010. Retrieved from www.givingusareports.org.
67. Gordon C. W.,Babchuk N.A typology of voluntary associations.American Sociological Review. 1959;24 (1): 22-29.
68. Graham L.On the line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese model and the American worker. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1995:.
69. Gramsci A.Prison notebooks. Buttigieg J. A., ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1992:.
70. Hackman J. R.,Wageman R.Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1995;40:309-342.
71. Haines H.Black radicals and the civil rights mainstream, 1954-1970. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press; 1988:.
72. Hallett T.,Ventresca M.Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner's Patterns of industrial bureaucracy.Theory and Society. 2006;25:213-238.
73. Handy F.,Seto S.,Wakaruk A.,Mersey B.,Mejia A.,Copeland L.The discerning consumer: Is nonprofit status a factor?.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2010;39:866-883.
74. Harris M.Doing it their way: Organizational challenges for voluntary associations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 1998;27:144-158.
75. Organizational participation: Myth and reality. Heller F.Pusic E.Strauss G.Wilpert B., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1998:.
76. Hensmans M.Social movement organizations: A metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields.Organizational Studies. 2003;24:355-381.
77. Herranz J.,Council L. R.,McKay B.Tri-value organization as a form of social enterprise: The case of Seattle's FareStart.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2011;40:829-849.
78. Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives. Hoffman A. J.Ventresca M. J., ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2002:.
79. Hooghe M.Participation in voluntary associations and value indicators: The effect of current and previous participation experiences.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2003a;32 (1): 47-69.
80. Hooghe M.Value congruence and convergence within voluntary associations: Ethnocentrism in Belgian organizations.Political Behavior. 2003b;25:151-175.
81. Hudson A.Advocacy by UK-based development NGOs.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2002;31:402-418.
82. HundleyK. (2011, May10). Billionaires' role in hiring decisions at Florida State University raises questions. Retrieved from http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/billionaires-role-in-hiring-decisions-at-florida-state-university-raises/1168680.
83. Iannaccone L. R.Why strict churches are strong.American Journal of Sociology. 1994;99:1180-1211.
84. From belief to commitment: The community service activities and finances of religious congregations in the United States. Washington, DC: Author; 1992 1993 ed.:.
85. Jackall R.Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1988:.
86. Jenkins J. C.Radical transformation of organizational goals.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1977;22:568-586.
87. Johnston L.The religious dimensions of sustainability: Institutional religions, civil society, and international politics since the turn of the twentieth century.Religion Compass. 2010;4/3:176-189.
88. Juris J. S.Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation.American Ethnologist. 2012;39:259-279.
89. Juris J. S.,Ronayne M.,Shokooh-Valle F.,Wengronowitz R.Negotiating power and difference within the 99%.Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest. 2012;11:434-440.
90. Kalleberg A. L.,Marsden P. V.,Reynolds J.,Knoke D.Beyond profit? Sectoral differences in high-performance work practices.Work and Occupations. 2006;33:271-302.
91. Kanter R. M.Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities.American Sociological Review. 1968;33:499-517.
92. Kanter R. M.Commitment and community: Communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1972:.
93. Keating P.Building coalitional consciousness.NWSA Journal. 2005;17 (2): 86-103.
94. Kennedy S. S.,Bielefeld W.Charitable choice at work: Evaluating faith-based job programs in the States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2006:.
95. Kleinman S.Opposing ambitions: Gender and identity in an alternative organization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996:.
96. Knutsen W. L.Value as a self-sustaining mechanism: Why some nonprofit organizations are different from and similar to private and public organizations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:985-1005.
97. Knutsen W. L.,Brower R. S.Managing expressive and instrumental accountabilities in nonprofit and voluntary associations: A qualitative investigation.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2010;39:588-610.
98. Konieczny P.Governance, organization, and democracy on the Internet: The iron law and the evolution of Wikipedia.Sociological Forum. 2009;24 (1): 162-192.
99. Kreutzer K.,Jäger U.Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2011;40:634-661.
100. Kunda G.Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1992:.
101. Kvasny L.,Lee R.The paradoxical consequences of the White House faith-based and community initiative for black churches.New Media Society. 2009;12:619-636.
102. Leach D. K.An elusive "we": Antidogmatism, democratic practice, and the contradictory identity of the German Autonomen.American Behavioral Scientist. 2009;52:1042-1068.
103. LeeC. W. (2011). Five assumptions academics make about public deliberation, and why they deserve rethinking. Journal of Public Deliberation, 7(1), Article 7. Retrieved from http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol7/iss1/art7.
104. Lee C. W.,Lingo E. L.The "Got Art?" paradox: Questioning the value of art in collective action.Poetics. 2011;39:316-335.
105. Leviten-Reid C.Organizational form, parental involvement, and quality of care in child day care centers.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2012;41 (1): 36-57.
106. Lichterman P.Elusive togetherness: Church groups trying to bridge America's divisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005:.
107. Lipsky M.The street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1980:.
108. Lounsbury M.,Ventresca M.,Hirsch P.Social movements, field frames, and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling.Socio-Economic Review. 2003;1 (1): 71-104.
109. Lukes S.Power: A radical view. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:.
110. Lune H. Paper presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society; 2007aPhiladelphia, PA; 2007a.
111. Lune H.Urban action networks: HIV/AIDS and community organizing in New York City. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield; 2007b:.
112. Marwell N.Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors.American Sociological Review. 2004;69:265-291.
113. Marwell N. P.,McInerney P.The nonprofit/for-profit continuum: Theorizing the dynamics of mixed-form markets.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2005;34 (1): 7-28.
114. Marx K.Capital: A critique of political economy, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Vintage Books; 1977:.
115. Martin P. Y.Rethinking feminist organizations.Gender & Society. 1990;4:182-206.
116. Massey D,Denton N. E.American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993:.
117. McAdam D.Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1982:.
118. McAdam D.,McCarthy J. D.,Zald M. N.Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. McAdam D.McCarthy J. D.Zald M. N., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1996:1-20.
119. McLaughlin M.,Scott W. R.,Deschenes S.,Hopkins K.,Newman A.Between movement & establishment: Organizations advocating for youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2009:.
120. McPherson M.,Smith-Lovin L.,Cook J. M.Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27:415-444.
121. McRoberts O.Streets of glory: Church and community in a black urban neighborhood. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003:.
122. Medvetz T.Think thanks in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2012:.
123. Meyer J. W.Translating organizational change. Czarniawska B.Sevon G., ed. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyther; 1996:241-272.
124. Meyer J. W.,Rowan B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;83:340-363.
125. Michels R.Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York, NY: Free Press; 1962:.
126. Mikkelsen E.An Analysis of the Social Meanings of Conflict in Nonprofit Organizations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 42. 2013;:923-941.
127. MilkmanR.LuceS.LewisP. (2013). Changing the subject: A bottom-up account of Occupy Wall Street in New York City. Retrieved from http://sps.cuny.edu/static/jsmi/research_publications.html.
128. Minkoff D. C.Bending with the wind: Strategic change and adaptation by women's and radical minority organizations.American Journal of Sociology. 1999;104:1666-1703.
129. Minkoff D. C.The emergence of hybrid organizational forms: Combining identity-based service provision and political action.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2002;31:377-401.
130. Moore M. H.Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2000;29:183-204.
131. Morgan G.Images of organization. 1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997:.
132. Morrill C.,Fine G. A.Ethnographic contributions to organizational sociology.Sociological Methods and Research. 1997;25:424-451.
133. Moulton S.,Eckerd A.Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector: Resources, roles, and public values.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2012;41:656-685.
134. Mumby D. K.,Putnam L.The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality.Academy of Management Review. 1992;17:465-486.
135. Munson Z.The making of pro-life activists: How social movement mobilization works. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago; 2009:.
136. Murray F.The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions.American Journal of Sociology. 2010;116:341-388.
137. Nepstad S. E.Persistent resistance: Commitment and community in the Plowshares movement.Social Problems. 2004;51 (1): 43-60.
138. Noy D.When framing fails: Ideas, influence, and resources in San Francisco's homeless policy field.Social Problems. 2009;56:223-242.
139. Osterman P.Overcoming oligarchy: Culture and agency in social movement organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2006;51:622-649.
140. Ostrander S. A.Money for change: Social movement philanthropy at Haymarket People's Fund. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1995:.
141. Ostrander S. A.Moderating contradictions of feminist philanthropy: Women's community organizations and the Boston Women's Fund, 1995 to 2000.Gender and Society. 2004;18 (1): 29-46.
142. Ostrom E.Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
143. Ostrower F.Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995:.
144. Ostrower F.Trustees of culture: Power, wealth, and status on elite arts boards. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago; 2002:.
145. Perrow C.Complex organizations. 1986). Complex organizations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Random House.New York, NY: Random House; 1986:.
146. Perrow C.An organizational analysis of organizational theory.Contemporary Sociology. 2000;29:469-476.
147. Persons G. A.National politics and charitable choice as urban policy for community development.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2004;594:65-78.
148. Peterson R. A.Revitalizing the culture concept.Annual Review of Sociology. 1979;5:137-166.
149. Pfeffer J.,Salancick G. F.The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row; 1978:.
150. Polletta F.Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2002:.
151. Polletta F.How participatory democracy became white: Culture and organizational choice.Mobilization. 2005;10:271-288.
152. Putnam R.Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2000:.
153. Ra D. M.,Rees J. A.Religious actors, civil society and the development agenda: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion.Journal of International Development. 2010;22 (1): 20-36.
154. Rao H.Market rebels: How activists make or break radical innovations. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2009:.
155. Razsa M.,Kurnik A.The Occupy Movement in Žižek's hometown: Direct democracy and a politics of becoming.American Ethnologist. 2012;39:238-258.
156. Reay T.,Hinings C. R.Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics.Organization Studies. 2009;30:629-652.
157. Rich A.Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
158. Riger S.Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action. Rappaport J.Swift C.Hess R., ed. New York, NY: Haworth; 1984:99-117.
159. Riger S.Challenges of success: Stages of growth in feminist organizations.Feminist Studies. 1994;20:275-300.
160. Roethlisberger F. J.,Dickson W.Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne works, Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1964:.
161. Rokeach M.The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press; 1973:.
162. Rothschild J.The Fate of Whistleblowers in Nonprofit Organizations.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:886-901.
163. Rothschild J.,Leach D.Handbook of community movements and local organizations. Cnaan R. A.Milofsky C., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2006:346-361.
164. Rothschild J.,Ollilainen M.Obscuring but not reducing managerial control: Does TQM measure up to democracy standards?.Economic and Industrial Democracy. 1999;20:583-623.
165. Rothschild J.,Whitt J. A.The cooperative workplace: Potentials and dilemmas of organizational democracy and participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1986:.
166. Rueschemeyer D.Variations on two themes in Durkheim's Division du travail: Power, solidarity, and meaning in division of labor.Sociological Forum. 1994;9 (1): 59-71.
167. Schein E. H.Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1992:.
168. Schmid H.Leadership styles and leadership change in human and community service organizations.Nonprofit Management & Leadership. 2006;17:179-194.
169. Schneider J.Comparing stewardship across religions.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:517-539.
170. SchuesslerJ. (2012, April30). Academia occupied by Occupy. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/01/books/academia-becomes-occupied-with-occupy-movement.html?pagewanted=all.
171. Schwenk C. R.Conflict in organizational decision making: An exploratory study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations.Management Science. 1990;36:436-448.
172. Scott W. R.,Davis G. F.Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2007:.
173. Sewell G.The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1998;43:397-428.
174. Schiller R.,Almog-Bar M.Revisiting collaborations between nonprofits and businesses: A NPO-centric view and typology.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:942-962.
175. Simon H. A.Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. 1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1945)New York, NY: Free Press; 1997:.
176. Sirianni C.Critical studies in organization & bureaucracy. Fischer F.Sirianni C., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1984:554-576.
177. Small M."How many cases do I need?" On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research.Ethnography. 2009;10 (5): 5-38.
178. Smith D. H.The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in prevailing "flat earth" maps of the sector.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 1997;26 (2): 114-131.
179. Smith S. R.,Lipsky M.Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993:.
180. SonmezF. (2011, December1). House Republicans criticize White House for denying grant to Catholic group. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-republicans-criticize-white-house-for-denying-grant-to-catholic-group/2011/12/01/gIQASb2NIO_story.html.
181. Spates J. L.The sociology of values.Annual Review of Sociology. 1983;9:27-49.
182. Spradley J. P.The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1979:.
183. Staggenborg S.The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the pro-choice movement.American Sociological Review. 1988;53:585-605.
184. Staggenborg S.Beyond culture versus politics: A case study of a local women's movement.Gender & Society. 2001;15:507-530.
185. Standage T.The Turk: The life and times of the famous eighteenth-century chess playing machine. New York, NY: Walker; 2002:.
186. Stark D.The twenty-first-century firm: Changing economic organization in international perspective. DiMaggio P., ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001:69-104.
187. Starr P.Co-ops, communes, and collectives: Experiments in social change in the 1960s and 1970s. Case J.Taylor R. C. R., ed. New York, NY: Pantheon; 1979:245-273.
188. Su C.Streetwise for book smarts: Grassroots organizing and education reform in the Bronx. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press; 2009a:.
189. Su C.We call ourselves by many names: Storytelling and inter-minority coalition-building.Community Development Journal. 2009b;45:439-457.
190. Swarts H. J.Organizing urban America: Secular and faith-based progressive movements. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2008:.
191. Swidler A.Organization without authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979:.
192. Swidler A.Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.American Sociological Review. 1986;51 (2): 273-286.
193. Taylor F. W.The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper; 1919:.
194. Taylor V.Social movement continuity: The women's movement in abeyance.American Sociological Review. 1989;54:761-775.
195. Thomas J. E."Everything about US is feminist": The significance of ideology in organizational change.Gender & Society. 1999;13 (1): 101-119.
196. Thornton P. H.Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2004:.
197. Thornton P. H.,Ocasio W.The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Greenwood R.Oliver C.Suddaby R.Sahlin K., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage; 2008:99-129.
198. Thornton P. H.,Ocasio W.,Lounsbury M.The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012:.
199. Tuchman G.Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2009:.
200. Verba S.,Schlozman K. L.,Brady H.Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995:.
201. Walker E.Contingent pathways from joiner to activist: The indirect effect of participation in voluntary associations on civic engagement.Sociological Forum. 2008;23 (1): 116-143.
202. Walker E.Putting a face on the issue: Corporate stakeholder mobilization in professional grassroots lobbying campaigns.Business & Society. 2012;51:561-601.
203. Watkins-Hayes C.The new welfare bureaucrats: Entanglements of race, class, and policy reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2009:.
204. Weber M.Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Gerth H. H.Mills C. W., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1958:196 214-204 216.
205. Weber M.On law in economy and society. Rheinstein M., ed. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1967 1925:.
206. Whyte W. F.,Whyte K. K.Making Mondragón: The growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press; 1988:.
207. Willis P.Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1981:.
208. Wilson C.Collaboration of Nonprofit Organizations with Local Government for Immigrant Language Acquisition.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:963-984.
209. Wilson J. Q.Bureaucracy: What governmental agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1989:.
210. Wilson J. Q.Political organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995:.
211. Witesman E. M.,Fernandez S.Government contracts with private organizations: Are there differences between nonprofits and for-profits?.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:689-715.
212. Wittberg P.Faith-based umbrella organizations: Implications for religious identity.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2013;42:540-562.
213. Occupying Wall Street: The inside story of an action that changed America. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books; 2011:.
214. Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life. Ybema S.Yanow D.Wels H.Kamsteeg F. H., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:.
215. Yeung A. B.An intricate triangle-Religiosity, volunteering, and social capital: The European perspective, the case of Finland.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2004;33:401-422.
216. Zablocki B.Alienation and charisma: A study of contemporary American communes. New York, NY: Free Press; 1980:.
217. Zilber T. B.Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel.Academy of Management Journal. 2002;45:234-254.
218. Zohar A.,Borkman T. J.Emergent order and self-organization: A case study of Alcoholics Anonymous.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 1997;26:527-552.
219. Zucker L. G.Organizations as institutions.Research in the Sociology of Organizations. 1983;2:1-47.