Did the faith-based initiative change congregations?

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 343-355

  Chaves, Mark ^a   Wineburg, Bob ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Congregations; Faith based initiative; Religion; Social services; Trends

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749252793     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0899764009333955     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ammerman, N.T. (2005). Pillars of faith: American congregations and their partners. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Campbell, D. (2008, November). Do faith-based initiatives spur enduring local partnerships? A post-initiative analysis. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Center for Public Justice. (1997). A guide to charitable choice: The rules of Section 104 of the 1996 federal welfare law governing state cooperation with faith-based social-service providers. Washington, DC: Center for Public Justice.
4. Chaves, M. (2004). Congregations in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Chaves, M., & Anderson, S.L. (2008). Continuity and change in American congregations: Introducing the second wave of the National Congregations Study. Sociology of Religion, 69, 415-440.
6. Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: What they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 660-683.
7. Cnaan, R.A. (1999). The newer deal: Social work and religion in partnership. New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Davis, D., & Hankins, B. (Eds.). (1999). Welfare reform & faith-based organizations. Waco, TX: J. M. Dawson Institute on Church-State Studies, Baylor University.
9. Davis, J.A., Smith, T.W., & Marsden, P.V. (2007). General social surveys, 1972-2006: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
10. Elisha, O. (2008). Moral ambitions of grace: The paradox of compassion and accountability in evangelical faith-based activism. Cultural Anthropology, 23, 154-189.
11. Farnsley, A. (2003). Rising expectations: Urban congregations, welfare reform, and civic life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12. Farris, A., Nathan, R.P., & Wright, D.J. (2004). The expanding administrative presidency: George W. Bush and the faith-based initiative. Albany: The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.
13. Kennedy, S.S., & Bielefeld, W. (2006). Charitable choice at work: Evaluating faith-based jobs programs in the states. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
14. Kramer, F.D., Finegold, K., De Vita, C.J., & Wherry, L. (2005). Federal policy on the ground: Faith-based organizations delivering local services. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
15. Kuo, D. (2007). Tempting faith: An inside story of political seduction. New York: Free Press.
16. Lichterman, P. (2005). Elusive togetherness: Church groups trying to bridge America's divisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Sager, R. (in press). Holy smoke and mirrors: Faith-based policy and politics in the states. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Wineburg, B. (2001). A limited partnership: The politics of religion, welfare, and social service. New York: Columbia University Press.
19. Wineburg, B. (2007). Faith-based inefficiency: The follies of Bush's initiatives. Westport, CT: Praeger.
20. Wuthnow, R. (2004). Saving America? Faith-based services and the future of civil society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.