Changes in Diversity, Abundance, and Structure of Soil Bacterial Communities in Brazilian Savanna Under Different Land Use Systems

Microbial Ecology

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 593-607

  Rampelotto, Pabulo Henrique ^a   de Siqueira Ferreira, Adão ^b   Barboza, Anthony Diego Muller ^a   Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PAMPA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDOBACTERIA; ACTINOBACTERIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PROTEOBACTERIA;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIODIVERSITY; BRAZIL; CLASSIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

AGRICULTURE; BACTERIA; BIODIVERSITY; BRAZIL; ECOSYSTEM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84884419106     PISSN: 00953628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-013-0235-y     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (2002) Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia Press, New York.
2. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
3. Mittermeier RA, Robles Gil P, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, Fonseca GAB (2005) Hotspots revisited: earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. University of Chicago Press, Boston.
4. Carvalho FMV, de Marco P, Ferreira LG (2009) The Cerrado into-pieces: habitat fragmentation as a function of landscape use in the savannas of central Brazil. Biol Conservation 142: 1392-1403.
5. Sano EE, Rosa R, Brito JLS, Ferreira L (2010) Land cover mapping of the tropical savanna region in Brazil. Environ Monit Assess 166: 11-124.
6. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2009) Relatório técnico de monitoramento do desmatamento no Bioma Cerrado, 2002 a 2008: Dados revisados. MMA, Brasilia.
7. Marris E (2005) The forgotten ecosystem. Nature 437: 944-945.
8. Ferreira J, Pardini R, Metzger JP, Fonseca CR, Pompeu PS, Sparovek G, Louzada J (2012) Towards environmentally sustainable agriculture in Brazil: challenges and opportunities for applied ecological research. J Appl Ecol 49: 535-541.
9. Bisset A, Richardson A, Baker G, Thrall PH (2011) Long-term land use effects on soil microbial community struture and function. Appl Soil Ecol 51: 66-78.
10. Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biol 19: 707-713.
11. Quirino BF, Pappas GJ, Tagliaferro AC, Collevatti RG, Neto EL, da Silva MR, Bustamante MM, Krüger RH (2009) Molecular phylogenetic diversity of bacteria associated with soil of the savanna-like Cerrado vegetation. Microbiol Res 164: 59-70.
12. Bresolin JD, Bustamante MMC, Krüger RH, Silva MRSS, Perez KS (2010) Structure and composition of bacterial and fungal community in soil under soybean monoculture in the Brazilian Cerrado. Braz J Microbiol 41: 391-403.
13. Peixoto RS, da Costa Coutinho HL, Rumjanek NG, Macrae A, Rosado AS (2010) A decade of land use contributes to changes in the chemistry, biochemistry and bacterial community structures of soils in the Cerrado. Anton Leeuw Int 98: 403-413.
14. Araujo JF, de Castro AP, Costa MC, Togawa RC, Pappas-Júnior GJ, Quirino BF, Bustamante MMC, Williamson L, Handelsman J, Krüger RH (2012) Characterization of soil bacterial assemblies in Brazilian Savanna-like vegetation reveals acidobacteria dominance. Microb Ecol 64: 760-770.
15. Hamady M, Walker JJ, Harris JK, Gold NJ, Knight R (2008) Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex. Nat Methods 5: 235-237.
16. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7: 335-336.
17. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537-7541.
18. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(16): 5261-5267.
19. Lemos LN, Fulthorpe RR, Triplett EW, Roesch LF (2011) Rethinking microbial diversity analysis in the high throughput sequencing era. J Microbiol Methods 86: 42-51.
20. Giongo A, Crabb DB, Davis-Richardson AG, Chauliac D, Mobberley JM, Gano KA, Mukherjee N, Casella G, Roesch LF, Walts B, Riva A, King G, Triplett EW (2010) PANGEA: pipeline for analysis of next generation amplicons. ISME J 4: 852-861.
21. Delmont TO, Robe P, Cecillon S, Clark IM, Constancias F, Simonet P, Hirsch PR, Vogel TM (2011) Accessing the soil metagenome for studies of microbial diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 1315-1324.
22. Lombard N, Prestat E, van Elsas JD, Simonet P (2011) Soil-specific limitations for access and analysis of soil microbial communities by metagenomics. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78: 31-49.
23. Viana LT, Bustamante MMC, Molina M, Pinto AS, Kisselle K, Zepp R, Burke RA (2011) Microbial communities in Cerrado soils under native vegetation subjected to prescribed fire and under pasture. Pesq Agropec Bras 46: 1665-1672.
24. Mendes IC, Fernandes MF, Chaer GM, Junior FBR (2012) Biological functioning of Brazilian Cerrado soils under different vegetation types. Plant Soil 359: 183-195.
25. Feinstein L, Sul W, Blackwood C (2009) Assessment of bias associated with incomplete extraction of microbial DNA from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 5428-5433.
26. Inceoglu O, Hoogwout EF, Hill P, van Elsas JD (2010) Effect of DNA extraction method on the apparent microbial diversity of soil. Appl Environ Microb 76: 3378-3382.
27. Kakirde KS, Parsley LC, Liles MR (2010) Size does matter: application-driven approaches for soil metagenomics. Soil Biol Biochem 42: 1911-1923.
28. Petric I, Philippot L, Abbate C, Bispo A, Chesnot T, Hallin S, Laval K, Lebeau T, Lemanceau P, Leyval C, Lindström K, Pandard P, Romero E, Sarr A, Schloter M, Simonet P, Smalla K, Wilke BM, Martin-Laurent F (2011) Inter-laboratory evaluation of the ISO standard 11063. Soil quality-method to directly extract DNA from soil samples. J Microbiol Methods 84: 454-460.
29. Frostegard A, Courtois S, Ramisse V, Clerc S, Bernillon D, Le Gall F, Jeannin P, Nesme X, Simonet P (1999) Quantification of bias related to the extraction of DNA directly from soils. Appl Environ Microb 65: 5409-5420.
30. Wilson IG (1997) Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microb 63: 3741-3751.
31. Schriewer A, Wehlmann A, Wuertz S (2011) Improving qPCR efficiency in environmental samples by selective removal of humic acids with DAX-8. J Microbiol Methods 85: 16-21.
32. Luna GM, Dell'Anno A, Danovaro R (2006) DNA extraction procedure: a critical issue for bacterial diversity assessment in marine sediments. Environ Microbiol 8: 308-320.
33. Howeler M, Ghiorse WC, Walker LP (2003) A quantitative analysis of DNA extraction and purification from compost. J Microbiol Meth 54: 37-45.
34. Wu JY, Jiang XT, Jiang YX, Lu SY, Zou F, Zhou HW (2010) Effects of polymerase, template dilution and cycle number on PCR based 16S rRNA diversity analysis using the deep sequencing method. BMC Microbiol 10: 255.
35. Aird D, Ross MG, Chen WS, Danielsson M, Fennell T, Russ C, Jaffe DB, Nusbaum C, Gnirke A (2011) Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries. Genome Biol 12: R18.
36. López-Barragán MJ, Quiñones M, Cui K, Lemieux J, Zhao K, Su XZ (2011) Effect of PCR extension temperature on high-throughput sequencing. Mol Biochem Parasitol 176: 64-67.
37. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL (2011) Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One 6: e27310.
38. Pinto AJ, Raskin L (2012) PCR biases distort bacterial and archaeal community structure in pyrosequencing datasets. PLoS One 7: e43093.
39. Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan D (2003) Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Methods 55: 541-555.
40. Mao DP, Zhou Q, Chen CY, Quan ZX (2012) Coverage evaluation of universal bacterial primers using the metagenomic datasets. BMC Microbiol 12: 66. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2180-12-66.
41. Farris MH, Olson JB (2007) Detection of Actinobacteria cultivated from environmental samples reveals bias in universal primers. Lett Appl Microbiol 45: 376-381.
42. Sipos R, Szekely AJ, Palatinszky M, Revesz S, Marialigeti K, Nikolausz M (2007) Effect of primer mismatch, annealing temperature and PCR cycle number on 16S rRNA gene-targeting bacterial community analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60: 341-350.
43. Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA, Olsen GJ (2008) Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 2461-2470.
44. Morales SE, Holben WE (2009) Empirical testing of 16S rRNA gene PCR primer pairs reveals variance in target specificity and efficacy not suggested by in silico analysis. Appl Environ Microb 75: 2677-2683.
45. Claesson MJ, Wang Q, O'Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, Cole JR, Ross RP, O'Toole PW (2010) Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleic Acids Res 38: e200.
46. Wang Y, Qian PY (2009) Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS One 4: e7401.
47. Winsley T, van Dorst JM, Brown MV, Ferrari BC (2012) Capturing greater 16S rRNA gene sequence diversity within the domain Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 5938-5941.
48. Bergmann GT, Bates ST, Eilers KG, Lauber CL, Caporaso JG, Walters WA, Knight R, Fierer N (2011) The under-recognized dominance of Verrucomicrobia in soil bacterial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 1450-1455.
49. Berry D, Ben Mahfoudh K, Wagner M, Loy A (2011) Barcoded primers used in multiplex amplicon pyrosequencing bias amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 7846-7849.
50. Liu Z, Lozupone C, Hamady M, Bushman FD, Knight R (2007) Short pyrosequencing reads suffice for accurate microbial community analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 35: e120.
51. Quince C, Lanzén A, Curtis TP, Davenport RJ, Hall N, Head IM, Read LF, Sloan WT (2009) Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Nat Methods 6: 639-641.
52. Gomez-Alvarez V, Teal TK, Schmidt TM (2009) Systematic artifacts in metagenomes from complex microbial communities. ISME J 3: 1314-1317.
53. Teal TK, Schmidt TM (2010) Identifying and removing artificial replicates from 454 pyrosequencing data. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 4: pdb. prot5409. doi: 10. 1101/pdb. prot5409.
54. Niu B, Fu L, Sun S, Li W (2010) Artificial and natural duplicates in pyrosequencing reads of metagenomic data. BMC Bioinform 11: 187.
55. Quince C, Lanzen A, Davenport R, Turnbaugh P (2011) Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinform 12: 38.
56. Wooley JC, Ye Y (2009) Metagenomics: facts and artifacts, and computational challenges. J Comp Sci Technol 25: 71-81.
57. Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol 12: 118-123.
58. Bakker MG, Tu ZJ, Bradeen JM, Kinkel LL (2012) Implications of pyrosequencing error correction for biological data interpretation. PLoS One 7: e44357. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0044357.
59. Novais RC, Thorstenson YR (2011) The evolution of Pyrosequencing® for microbiology: from genes to genomes. J Microbiol Methods 86: 1-7.
60. Spain AM, Krumholz LR, Elshahed MS (2009) Abundance, composition, diversity and novelty of soil Proteobacteria. ISME J 3: 992-1000.
61. Sait M, Davis KE, Janssen PH (2006) Effect of pH on isolation and distribution of members of subdivision 1 of the phylum Acidobacteria occurring in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 1852-1857.
62. Jones RT, Robeson MS, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N (2009) A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses. ISME J 3: 442-453.
63. Bruce T, Martinez I, Maia Neto O, Vicente A, Kruger R, Thompson F (2010) Bacterial community diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest soils. Microb Ecol 60: 840-849.
64. Nacke H, Thürmer A, Wollherr A, Will C, Hodac L, Herold N, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Daniel R (2011) Pyrosequencing-based assessment of bacterial community structure along different management types in German forest and grassland soils. PLoS One 6: e17000.
65. Naether A, Foesel BU, Naegele V, Wüst PK, Weinert J, Bonkowski M, Alt F, Oelmann Y, Polle A, Lohaus G, Gockel S, Hemp A, Kalko EKV, Linsenmair KE, Pfeiffer S, Renner S, Schöning I, Weisser WW, Wells K, Fischer M, Overmann J, Friedrich MW (2012) Environmental factors affect acidobacterial communities below the subgroup level in grassland and forest soils. Appl Environ Microb. doi: 10. 1128/AEM. 01325-1.
66. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88: 1354-1364.
67. Ward NL, Challacombe JF, Janssen PH, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Wu M, Xie G, Haft DH, Sait M, Badger J, Barabote RD, Bradley B, Brettin TS, Brinkac LM, Bruce D, Creasy T, Daugherty SC, Davidsen TM, DeBoy RT, Detter JC, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Ganapathy A, Gwinn-Giglio M, Han CS, Khouri H, Kiss H, Kothari SP, Madupu R, Nelson KE, Nelson WC, Paulsen I, Penn K, Ren Q, Rosovitz MJ, Selengut JD, Shrivastava S, Sullivan SA, Tapia R, Thompson LS, Watkins KL, Yang Q, Yu C, Zafar N, Zhou L, Kuske CR (2009) Three genomes from the phylum acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2046-2056.
68. Quaiser A, Ochsenreiter T, Lanz C, Schuster SC, Treusch AH, Eck J, Schleper C (2003) Acidobacteria form a coherent but highly diverse group within the bacterial domain: evidence from environmental genomics. Mol Microbiol 50: 563-575.
69. Barns SM, Takala SL, Kuske CR (1999) Wide distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial kingdom Acidobacterium in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 1731-1737.
70. Barns SM, Cain EC, Sommerville L, Kuske CR (2007) Acidobacteria phylum sequences in uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments greatly expand the known diversity within the phylum. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 3113-3116.
71. Lee SH, Ka JO, Cho JC (2008) Members of the phylum Acidobacteria are dominant and metabolically active in rhizosphere soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 285: 263-269.
72. Holmes AJ, Bowyer J, Holley MP, O'Donoghue M, Montgomery M, Gillings MR (2000) Diverse, yet-to-be-cultured members of the Rubrobacter subdivision of the Actinobacteria are widespread in Australian arid soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33: 111-120.
73. Ventura M, Canchaya C, Tauch A, Chandra G, Fitzgerald GF, Chater KF, Dv S (2007) Genomics of actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71: 495-548.
74. Le Blanc JC, Goncalves ER, Mohn WW (2008) Global response to desiccation stress in the soil actinomycete Rhodococcus jostii RHA1. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 2627-2636.
75. Essoussi I, Boujmil R, Nouioui I, Abbassi-Ghozzi I, Hamza A, Boudabous A, Gtari M (2011) Genetic diversity and esterase-profiling of Actinobacteria isolated from Sahara desert stones and monuments. Geomicrobiol J 29: 23-28.
76. Gremion F, Chatzinotas A, Harms H (2003) Comparative 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA sequence analysis indicates that Actinobacteria might be a dominant part of the metabolically active bacteria in heavy metal-contaminated bulk and rhizosphere soil. Environ Microbiol 5: 896-907.
77. Schmidt A, Haferburg G, Sineriz M, Merten D, Büchel G, Kothe E (2005) Heavy metal resistance mechanisms in actinobacteria for survival in AMD contaminated soils. Chemie der Erde-Geochem 65: 131-144.
78. Lauber CL, Strickland MS, Bradford MA, Fierer N (2008) The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land use types. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2407-2415.
79. Hill P, Krištůfek V, Dijkhuizen L, Boddy C, Kroetsch D, van Elsas JD (2011) Land use intensity controls actinobacterial community structure. Microb Ecol 61: 286-302.
80. Acosta-Martínez V, Dowd SE, Sun Y, Allen VG (2008) Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2762-2770.
81. Leng J, Xie L, Zhu R, Yang S, Gou X, Li S, Mao H (2011) Dominant bacterial communities in the rumen of Gayals (Bos frontalis), Yaks (Bos grunniens) and Yunnan Yellow Cattle (Bos taurs) revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Mol Biol Rep 38: 4863-4872.
82. Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Welch DM, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ (2006) Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored 'rare biosphere'. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 12115-12120.
83. Elshahed MS, Youssef NH, Spain AM, Sheik C, Najar FZ, Sukharnikov LO, Roe BA, Davis JP, Schloss PD, Bailey VL, Krumholz LR (2008) Novelty and uniqueness patterns of rare members of the soil biosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 5422-5428.
84. Pester M, Bittner N, Deevong P, Wagner M (2010) A "rare biosphere" microorganism contributes to sulfate reduction in a peatland. ISME J 4: 1-12.
85. Shade A, Hogan CS, Klimowicz AK, Linske M, McManus PS, Handelsman J (2012) Culturing captures members of the soil rare biosphere. Environ Microbiol 1: 2247-2252.
86. Pedrós-Alió C (2012) The rare bacterial biosphere. Ann Rev Mar Sci 4: 449-466.
87. Reeder J, Knight R (2009) The 'rare biosphere': a reality check. Nat Methods 6: 636-637.
88. Huber JA, Morrison HG, Huse SM, Neal PR, Sogin ML, Mark-Welch DB (2010) Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ Microbiol 12: 1889-1898.
89. Jangid K, Williams MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Sanderlin JS, Reeves JH, Jenkins MB, Endale DM, Coleman DC, Whitman WB (2008) Relative impacts of land-use, management intensity and fertilization upon soil microbial community structure in agricultural systems. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2843-2853.
90. Miki T, Ushio M, Fukui S, Kondoh M (2010) Functional diversity of microbial decomposers facilitates plant coexistence in a plant-microbe-soil feedback model. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 14251-14256.
91. Mitchell RJ, Hester AJ, Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, Cameron CM, Hewison RL, Potts JM (2010) Is vegetation composition or soil chemistry the best predictor of the soil microbial community? Plant Soil 333: 417-430.
92. Miki T (2012) Microbe-mediated plant-soil feedback and its roles in a changing world. Ecol Res 27: 509-520.
93. Hossain Z, Sugiyama S (2011) Geographical structure of soil microbial communities in northern Japan: effects of distance, land use type and soil properties. Eur J Soil Biol 47: 88-89.