Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilities

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 29, Issue , 2014, Pages 43-55

  Mayer, Daniela ^a   Sodian, Beate ^a   Koerber, Susanne ^b   Schwippert, Knut ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive development; Elementary school age; Item response modeling; Scientific reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884324403     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adams R.J., Wilson M.R., Wang W.-C. The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement 1997, 21:1-23. 10.1177/0146621697211001.
2. Benchmarks for science literacy. Project 2061 1993, Oxford University Press, New York. American Association for the Advancement of Science (Ed.).
3. Amsel E., Brock S. The development of evidence evaluation skills. Cognitive Development 1996, 11:523-550. 10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90016-7.
4. Bullock M., Ziegler A. Scientific reasoning: developmental and individual differences. Individual development from 3 to 12. Findings from the Munich longitudinal study 1999, 38-60. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. F.E. Weinert, W. Schneider (Eds.).
5. Bullock M., Sodian B., Koerber S. Doing experiments and understanding science: development of scientific reasoning from childhood to adulthood. Human development from early childhood to early adulthood. Findings from the Munich longitudinal study 2009, 173-197. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. W. Schneider, M. Bullock (Eds.).
6. Bybee R.W. Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. Scientific literacy 1997, 37-68. IPN, Kiel. W. Gräber, C. Bolte (Eds.).
7. Carey S., Evans R., Honda M., Jay E., Unger C. An experiment is when you try it and see if it works. A study of junior high school students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education 1989, 11:514-529. 10.1080/0950069890110504.
8. Chen Z., Klahr D. All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development 1999, 70(5):1098-1120. 10.1111/1467-8624.00081.
9. Dunbar K., Klahr D. Developmental differences in scientific discovery processes. Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon 1989, 109-143. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. D. Klahr, K. Kotovsky (Eds.).
10. Embretson S.E., Reise S.P. Item response theory for psychologists 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
11. Hammann M., Phan T.T.H., Bayrhuber H. Experimentieren als Problemlösen: Lässt sich das SDDS-Modell nutzen, um unterschiedliche Dimensionen beim Experimentieren zu messen?. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft 2007, 8:33-49. 10.1007/978-3-531-90865-6_3.
12. Hartig J., Klieme E. Kompetenz und Kompetenzdiagnostik. Leistung und Leistungsdiagnostik 2006, 127-143. Springer, Heidelberg. K. Schweizer (Ed.).
13. Inhelder B., Piaget J. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence 1958, Basic Books, New York.
14. Jacobs R., Anderson V. Planning and problem solving skills following focal frontal brain lesions in childhood: analysis using the Tower of London. Child Neuropsychology 2002, 8(2):93-106. 10.1076/chin.8.2.93.8726.
15. Kerns K.A., Berenbaum S.A. Differences in spatial ability in children. Behavior Genetics 1991, 21(4):383-396. 10.1007/BF01065974.
16. Klahr D. Exploring science 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Klahr D., Nigam M. The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science 2004, 15:661-667. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x.
18. Klieme E., Funke J., Leutner D., Reimann P., Wirth J. Problemlösen als fächerübergreifende Kompetenz? Konzeption und erste Resultate aus einer Schulleistungsstudie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 2001, 47:179-200.
19. Koeppen K., Hartig J., Klieme E., Leutner D. Current issues in competence modeling and assessment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie - Journal of Psychology 2008, 216(2):61-73. 10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.61.
20. Koerber S., Sodian B. Preschool children's ability to visually represent relations. Developmental Science 2008, 11(3):390-395. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00683.x.
21. Koerber S., Sodian B. Reasoning from graphs in young children: preschoolers' ability to interpret covariation data from graphs. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology 2009, 2(2):73-86. 10.1891/1939-7054.2.2.73.
22. Koerber S., Sodian B., Thoermer C., Nett U. Scientific reasoning in young children: preschoolers' ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology 2005, 64(3):141-152. 10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141.
23. Krikorian R., Bartok J., Gay N. Tower of London procedure: a standard method and developmental data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1994, 16(6):840-850. 10.1017/S1355617797004517.
24. Kropf N. Entwicklung und Analyse von Messinstrumenten zur Erfassung des wissenschaftlichen Denkens im Grundschulalter 2010, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.
25. Kuhn D. What is scientific thinking and how does it develop?. Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development 2002, 371-393. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. U. Goswami (Ed.).
26. Kuhn D., Amsel E., O'Loughlin M. The development of scientific thinking skills 1988, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
27. Kuhn D., Garcia-Mila M., Zohar A., Andersen C. Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1995, 60(4):1-128. 10.1111/1540-5834.ep9602121001.
28. Kuhn D., Franklin S. The second decade: what develops (and how). Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language 2006, 953-993. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. 6th ed. W. Damon, R.M. Lerner, D. Kuhn, R.S. Siegler (Eds.).
29. Kuhn D., Pearsall S. Relations between metastrategic knowledge and strategic performance. Cognitive Development 1998, 13(2):227-247. 10.1016/S0885-2014(98)90040-5.
30. Kwon Y.-J., Lawson A.E. Linking brain growth with the development of scientific reasoning ability and conceptual change during adolescence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2000, 37(1):44-62. 1<44::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-J. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200001)37.
31. Lazonder A.W., Kamp E. Bit by bit or all at once? Splitting up the inquiry task to promote children's scientific reasoning. Learning and Instruction 2012, 22(6):458-464. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.005.
32. Lederman N.G. Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1992, 29(4):331-359. 10.1002/tea.3660290404.
33. Lenhard W., Schneider W. ELFE 1-6. Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst- bis Sechstklässler 2006, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
34. Mathewson J.H. Visual-spatial thinking: an aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education 1999, 83:33-54. 1<33::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83.
35. National Research Council National science education standards 1996, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
36. Neumann I., Neumann K., Nehm R. Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch-based analyses of a nature of science test. International Journal of Science Education 2011, 33(10):1373-1405. 10.1080/09500693.2010.511297.
37. Norris S., Phillips L. How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education 2003, 87:224-240. 10.1002/sce.10066.
38. Prain V., Waldrip B. An exploratory study of teachers' and students' use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education 2006, 28(15):1843-1866. 10.1080/09500690600718294.
39. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests 1960, Institute of Educational Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
40. Renner G. Testbesprechung. TL. Turm von London - Deutsche Version. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 2005, 37(4):223-225. 10.1026/0049-8637.37.4.223.
41. Ruffman T., Perner J., Olson D.R., Doherty M. Reflecting on scientific thinking: children's understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation. ChildDevelopment 1993, 64:1617-1636. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04203.x.
42. Sao Pedro M., Gobert J., Heffernan N., Beck J. Comparing pedagogical approaches for teaching the control of variables strategy. Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the cognitive science society 2009, 1294-1299. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. N.A. Taatgen, H. van Rijn (Eds.).
43. Schauble L. Belief revision in children: the role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1990, 49(1):31-57. 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90048-D.
44. Schauble L. The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology 1996, 32(1):102-119. 10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.102.
45. Schulz L., Gopnik A. Causal learning across domains. Developmental Psychology 2004, 40(2):162-176. 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.162.
46. Simon H.A. Seek and ye shall find. Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings 2001, 5-20. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. K. Crowley, C.D. Schunn, T. Okada (Eds.).
47. Shallice T. Specific impairments in planning. Philosophical Transcripts of theRoyal Society of London 1982, 298:199-209. 10.1098/rstb.1982.0082.
48. Shea D.L., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P. Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: a 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 93(3):604-614. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.604.
49. Shepard R.N., Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 1971, 171:701-703. 10.1126/science.171.3972.701.
50. Smith C.L., Maclin D., Houghton C., Hennessey M.G. Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: the impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction 2000, 18(3):349-422. 10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3.
51. Sodian B., Carey S., Grosslight L., Smith C. Junior high school students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. The notion of interpretive frameworks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American research association, San Francisco 1992.
52. Sodian B., Jonen A., Thoermer C., Kircher E. Die Natur der Naturwissenschaften verstehen: Implementierung wissenschaftstheoretischen Unterrichts in der Grundschule. Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms 2006, 147-160. Waxmann, Münster. M. Prenzel, L. Allolio-Näcke (Eds.).
53. Sodian B., Zaitchik D., Carey S. Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development 1991, 6:753-766. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01567.x.
54. Strand-Cary M., Klahr D. Developing elementary science skills: instructional effectiveness and path independence. Cognitive Development 2008, 23:488-511. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.005.
55. St.Clair-Thompson H.L., Gathercole S.E. Executive functions and achievements in school: shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59(4):745-759. 10.1080/17470210500162854.
56. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662. 10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.15.
57. Thoermer C., Sodian B. Science undergraduates' and graduates' epistemologies of science: the notion of interpretive frameworks. New Ideas in Psychology 2002, 26:263-283. 10.1016/S0732-118X(02)00009-0.
58. Tschirgi J.E. Sensible reasoning: a hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development 1980, 51(1):1-10. 10.1111/1467-8624.ep12325377.
59. Tucha O., Lange K.W. Turm von London - Deutsche Version (TL-D) 2004, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
60. Tversky B., Kugelmass S., Winter A. Crosscultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology 1991, 23(4):515-557. 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90005-9.
61. Tytler R., Peterson S., Prain V. Picturing evaporation: learning science literacy through a particle presentation. Teaching Science 2006, 52(1):12-17.
62. Vandenberg S.G., Kuse A.R. Mental rotations: a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1978, 47:599-604. 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.
63. Wai J., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P. Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101(4):817-835. 10.1037/a0016127.
64. Wainer H. Atest of graphicacy in children. Applied Psychological Measurement 1980, 5(3):331-340. 10.1177/014662168000400305.
65. Warm T.A. Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response models. Psychometrika 1989, 54:427-450. 10.1007/BF02294627.
66. Weiß R.H. Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 - Revision (CFT 20-R) 2006, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
67. Wilhelm P., Beishuizen J.J. Content effects in self-directed inductive learning. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13:381-402. 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00013-0.
68. Wilkening F., Sodian B. Scientific reasoning in young children: introduction. Swiss Journal of Psychology 2005, 64(3):137-139. 10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.137.
69. Wu M., Adams R., Wilson M. ACER ConQuest 2005, Australian Council for Educational Research.
70. Zimmerman C. The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review 2007, 27(2):172-223. 10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001.