Developing elementary science skills: Instructional effectiveness and path independence

Cognitive Development

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 488-511

  Strand Cary, Mari ^a   Klahr, David ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Control of Variables; Direct instruction; Discovery learning; Experimental design; Far transfer; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 57149144508     PISSN: 08852014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adelson R. Instruction versus exploration in science learning. Monitor on Psychology 35 (2004) 34-36
2. Adolph, K. E., & Berger, S. A. (2006). Motor development. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.) (pp. 161-213). New York: Wiley.
3. Aicken F. The nature of science. 2nd ed. (1991), Heinemann Educational Books, Portsmouth, NH
4. Barnett S.M., and Ceci S.J. When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin 128 (2002) 612-637
5. Begley, S. (2004, December 10). The best ways to make schoolchildren learn? We just don't know. The Wall Street Journal Online (B1). Retrieved December 10, 2004 from http://online.wsj.com/article/0,SB110263537231796249,00.html.
6. Bianchini J.A., and Colburn A. Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (2000) 177-209
7. Bullock M., and Ziegler A. Scientific reasoning: Development and individual differences. In: Weinert F.E., and Schneider W. (Eds). Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study (1999), Max Plank Institute for Psychological Research, Munich 38-54
8. Cavanagh, S. (2004, November 10). NCLB could alter science teaching. Education Week, 24(11), 1: 12-13.
9. Chen Z., and Klahr D. All other things being equal: Children's acquisition of the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development 70 (1999) 1098-1120
10. Chen Z., and Klahr D. Remote transfer of scientific reasoning and problem-solving strategies in children. In: Kail R.V. (Ed). Advances in child development and behavior Vol. 36 (2008), Elsevier, Amsterdam 419-470
11. Crane, E. (2005). The science storm. District Administration, #3 (March).
12. Dean D., and Kuhn D. Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education 91 (2007) 384-397
13. EDC (2006). The Inquiry Synthesis Project, Center for Science Education, Education Development Center, Inc. Technical report 2: Conceptualizing Inquiry Science Instruction. Retrieved January 2, 2007, from http://cse.edc.org/work/research/inquirysynth/technicalreport2.pdf.
14. Ericsson K.A., and Charness N. Cognitive and developmental factors in expert performance. In: Feltovich P.J., Ford K.M., and Hoffman R.R. (Eds). Expertise in context: Human and machine (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 3-41
15. Geary D.C. Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In: Carlson J.S., and Levin J.R. (Eds). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology (2007), Information Age, Charlotte, NC 1-99
16. Gopnik A., Glymour C., Sobel D., Schulz L.E., Kushnir T., and Danks D. A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 1-31
17. Gopnik A., Meltzoff A.N., and Kuhl P.K. The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains and how children learn (1999), Hartper Collins, New York
18. Hake, R .R. (2005). Will the No Child Left Behind Act Promote Direct Instruction of Science? Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 50(1): 851. APS March Meeting, Los Angles, CA. 21-25 March; retrieved online at .
19. Hmelo-Silver C., Holton D.L., and Kolodner J. Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 9 3 (2000) 247-298
20. Hmelo-Silver C.E., Duncan R.G., and Chinn C.A. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42 2 (2007) 99-107
21. Kirschner P.A., Sweller J., and Clark R.E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41 2 (2006) 75-86
22. Klahr D., and Nigam M. The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 661-667
23. Klahr D., Chen Z., and Toth E. Cognitive development and science education: Ships passing in the night or beacons of mutual illumination?. In: Carver S.M., and Klahr D. (Eds). Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress (2001), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 75-120
24. Klahr D., and Simon H.A. Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin 125 5 (1999) 524-543
25. Klahr D., Triona L.M., and Williams C. Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical vs. virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (2007) 183-203
26. Kuhn D. Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education 77 (1993) 319-337
27. Kuhn D. Is direct instruction an answer to the right question?. Educational Psychologist 42 2 (2007) 109-113
28. Kuhn D., and Franklin S. The second decade: What develops (and how)?. In: Kuhn D., and Siegler R. (Eds). Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 2: Cognitive perception and language. 6th ed. (2006), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ 953-993
29. Kuhn, D. Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Anderson, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition, Society for Research in Child Development Monographs, 60(4, Serial No. 245).
30. Kuhn D., and Phelps E. The development of problem-solving strategies. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 17 (1982) 1-44
31. Li J., Klahr D., and Siler S. What lies beneath the science achievement gap? The challenges of aligning science instruction with standards and tests. Science Educator 15 (2006) 1-12
32. National Academy of Science. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press [http://books.nap.edu/books/0309063647/html/1.html].
33. Ruby A. Hands-on science and student achievement (2001), RAND, Santa Monica, CA
34. Schauble L. The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology 32 1 (1996) 102-119
35. Schmidt H.G., Loyens S.M.M., van Gog T., and Paas F. Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42 2 (2007) 91-97
36. Schwartz D.L., and Martin T. Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction 22 2 (2004) 129-184
37. Schulz L.E., and Sommerville J. Causal determinism and preschoolers' causal inferences. Child Development 77 2 (2006) 427-442
38. In: Steffe L., and Gale J. (Eds). Constructivism in education (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ
39. Sodian B., Zaitchik D., and Carey S. Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development 62 (1991) 753-766
40. Strand-Cary M., Klahr D., Siler S., Magaro C., and Li J. Training in experimental design (TED): Developing scalable and adaptive computer-based science instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society in Nashville (2007), TN
41. Toth E.E., Klahr D., and Chen Z. Bridging research and practice: A cognitively-based classroom intervention for teaching experimentation skills to elementary school children. Cognition & Instruction 18 4 (2000) 423-459
42. Tweed, A. (2004), December 15). Direct instruction: Is it the most effective science teaching strategy? NSTA WebNews Digest. Retrieved on January 3, 2005 from http://www.nsta.org/main/ news/stories/education story.php?news story ID=50045.
43. Zimmerman C. The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review 27 (2007) 172-223
44. Zohar A., and David A.B. Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning 3 (2008) 59-82