Scientific reasoning in young children: Preschoolers' ability to evaluate covariation evidence

Swiss Journal of Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 141-152

  Koerber, Susanne ^a   Sodian, Beate ^a   Thoermer, Claudia ^a   Nett, Ulrike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Covariation patterns; Domain specific biases; Non covariation; Preschoolers; Scientific reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 29344467115     PISSN: 14210185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54(3), 299-325.
2. Ash, A., Torrance, N., Lee, E., & Olson, D. R. (1993). The development of children's understanding of the evidence for beliefs. Educational Psychology, 13(3/4), 371-384.
3. Bullock, M., & Ziegler, A. (1999). Scientific reasoning: Developmental and individual differences. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12. Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study. Cambridge: University Press.
4. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 623-254.
5. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
6. Kanari, Z., & Millar, R. (2004). Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret data in science investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 748-769.
7. Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence. The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Kuhn. D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psycholagical Review, 96(4), 674-689.
9. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic.
10. Martignon L., & Wassner, C. (in press). Schulung frühen stochastischen Denkens in Kindern [Training of early stochastic thinking in children]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften.
11. Masnick, A. M., & Morris, B. J. (2002). Reasoning from data. The effect of sample size and variability in children's and adults' conclusions. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 643-648). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Millar, R., & Lubben, F. (1996). Investigative work in science. The role of prior expectations and evidence in shaping conclusions. Education, 3, 28-34.
13. Perner, J., & Davies, G. (1991). Understanding the mind as an active information processor: Do young children have a "copy theory of mind"? Cognition, 39(1), 51-69.
14. Rapp, A. F., & Wilkening, F. (in press). Children's recognition of the usefulness of a record: Distinguishing deterministic and probabilistic events. European Journal of Developmental Psychology.
15. Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Olson, D. R., & Doherty, M. (1993). Reflecting on scientific thinking: Children's understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation. Child Development, 64, 1617-1636.
16. Shultz, T. R., & Mendelson, R. (1975). The use of covariation as a principle of causal analysis. Child Development, 46(2), 394-399.
17. Singer, J. A., Kohn, A. S., & Resnick, L B., (1997). Knowing about proportions in different contexts. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 115-132). Hove: Psychology Press.
18. Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753-766.
19. Tschirgi, J. E. (1980). Sensible reasoning. A hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development, 51, 1-10.
20. Wassner, C., Martignon, L., & Sedlmeier, P. (2002). Die Bedeutung der Darbietungsform für das alltagsorientierte Lehren von Stochastik [The importance of presentation mode for teaching stochastics in everyday contexts]. In M. Prenzel & J. Doll (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: Schulische und außerschulische Bedingungen mathematischer, naturwissenschaftlicher und überfachlicher Kompetenzen. 45. Beiheft der Zeitschrift für Pädagogik (pp. 35-50). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
21. Wilkening, F. (1981). Integrating velocity, time, and distance variation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 231-247.