Environmental risk assessment for plant pests: A procedure to evaluate their impacts on ecosystem services

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 468-469, Issue , 2014, Pages 475-486

  Gilioli, G ^a   Schrader, G ^b   Baker, R H A ^c   Ceglarska, E ^d   Kertesz V K ^d   Lovei G ^e   Navajas, M ^f   Rossi, V ^g   Tramontini, S ^d   van Lenteren, J C ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTICS   (Germany)

^c FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

^d EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY   (Italy)

^e AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^f INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

^g UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

^h WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Environmental risk; Functional biodiversity; Invasive alien species (IAS); Plant pests; Service providing units

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; FUNCTIONAL BIODIVERSITY; INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES; PLANT PESTS; SERVICE-PROVIDING;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

BEETLE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; INVASIVE SPECIES; PEST SPECIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDIZATION;

AIR QUALITY; ANOPLOPHORA CHINENSIS; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INVASIVE SPECIES; LIFE HISTORY; NONHUMAN; PEST RESISTANCE; PLANT PEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES INVASION; TROPHIC LEVEL;

ANOPLOPHORA CHINENSIS; CITRUS; COLEOPTERA;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; FUNCTIONAL BIODIVERSITY; INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES (IAS); PLANT PESTS; SERVICE-PROVIDING UNITS;

ECOLOGICAL PARAMETER MONITORING; PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84884258782     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.068     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Adachi I. Population studies of Anoplophora malasiaca adults (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in a citrus grove. Res Popul Ecol 1990, 32:15-32.
2. Adachi I. Development and life cycle of Anoplophora malasiaca (Thomson) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on citrus trees under fluctuating and constant temperature regimes. Appl Entomol Zool 1994, 29:485-497.
3. Aikio S., Duncan R.P., Hulme P.E. Lag-phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts. Oikos 1994, 119:370-378.
4. Baker RHA, Eyre D. Pest risk analysis for Anoplophora chinensis. CSL, York, UK. 2006; (unpublished, internal CSL document).
5. Balvanera P., Pfisterer A.B., Buchmann N., He J.S., Nakashizuka T., Raffaelli D., et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 2006, 9:1146-1156.
6. Begon M., Townsend C.R., Harper J.L. Ecology: from individual to ecosystems 2006, Blackwell, Oxford. 4th ed.
7. Biosecurity Australia Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007 (update 2009) 2009, [Canberra].
8. Biosecurity New Zealand Risk analysis procedures, Version 1 [Internet] Apr 12. [cited 2013 Jan 3; 103 pp.] Available from:. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/surv-mgmt/surv/review/risk-analysis-procedures.pdf.
9. Boyd J., Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services?. Ecol Econ 2007, 63(2-3):616-626.
10. Brauman K.A., Daily G.C., Duarte T.K., Mooney H.A. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Ann Rev Environ Resour 2007, 32:67-98.
11. CABI Crop protection compendium 2007, [Internet], [cited 2013 April 22, Available from http://www.cabi.org/compendia/cpc/].
12. Callicott J.B., Crowder L.B., Mumford K. Current normative concepts in conservation. Conserv Biol 1999, 13(1):22-35.
13. Carpenter S.R., Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D. Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecol Soc 2006, 11(1):29. [[Internet]. [cited 2013 Jan 3] Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art29/].
14. Carpenter R.S., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Diaz S., et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. PNAS 2009, 106(5):1305-1312.
15. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) Glossary of terms 2002, [Internet], [cited 2013 Jan 3 Available from http://www.cbd.int/invasive/terms.shtml].
16. Cornelissen J.H.C., Lavorel S., Garnier E., Díaz S., Buchmann N., Gurvich D.E., et al. Handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 2003, 51:335-380.
17. Costanza R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol Conserv 2008, 141:350-352.
18. De Bello F., Lavorel S., Diaz S., Harrington R., Bardgett R.D., Berg M.P., et al. Functional traits underlie the delivery of ecosystem services across different trophic levels. deliverable of the Rubicode project [Internet], [cited 2013 Jan 3; 21 pp. Available from:]. http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/outputs.html.
19. De Bello F., Lavorel S., Diaz S., Harrington R., Cornelissen J.H.C., Bardgett R.D. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers Conserv 2010, 19:2873-2893.
20. Delvare G., Bon M.-C., Hérard F., Cocquempot C., Maspero M.M., Colombo M. Description of Aprostocetus anoplophorae n. sp. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a new egg parasitoid of the invasive pest Anoplophora chinensis (Förster) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann Soc entomol Fr 2004, 40(3-4):227-233. [n.s.].
21. Desprez-Loustau M.-L., Robin C., Buée M., Courtecuisse R., Garbaye J., Suffert F., et al. The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 2007, 22:472-480.
22. Díaz S., Cabido M. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16:646-655.
23. Díaz S., Fargione J., Chapin F.S., Tilman D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol 2006, 4(8):1300-1305.
24. Díaz S., Lavorel S., de Bello F., Quétier F., Grigulis K., Robson T.M. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. PNAS 2007, 104(52):20684-20689.
25. Donovan G.H., Butry D.T., Michael Y.L., Prestemon J.P., Liebhold A.M., Gatziolis D., et al. The relationship between trees and human health evidence from the spread of the Emerald ash borer. Am J Prev Med 2013, 44(2):139-145.
26. Duffy J.E. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection. Oikos 2002, 99:201-219.
27. Dumouchel L. Plant health risk assessment, Anoplophora glabripennis (Mots.) Asian Longhorn Beetle (Starry Sky Beetle) 2004, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Plant Health Risk Assessment Unit, Ontario, Canada.
28. EEA (European Environment Agency) Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessments. Environmental issue report 2001, 1-31. EEA, Copenhagen, [24].
29. EEA (European Environment Agency) Vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in Europe. EEA technical report 2005, 1-96. EEA, Copenhagen, [7].
30. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) Panel on Plant Health (PLH) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of plant pests. EFSA J 2011, 9(12):2460. [121 pp.].
31. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization) PRA documents 2011, [Internet], [cited 2013 Jan 3, Available from http://www.eppo.org/QUARANTINE/Pest_Risk_Analysis/PRA_documents.htm].
32. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization) PQR (Plant Quarantine Data Retrieval System) EPPO database on quarantine pests 2013, [Internet], [cited 2013 April 22, Available from http://www.eppo.int].
33. European Commission Commission implementing decision of 1 March 2012 as regards emergency measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the union of Anoplophora chinensis 2012, (Forster) (2012/138/EU).
34. Eyre D., Cannon R., McCann D., Whittaker R. Citrus longhorn beetle Anoplophora chinensis. An invasive pest in Europe. Outlook Pest Manag 2010, 21(4):195-198.
35. FAO International standards for phytosanitary measures 1 to 32. ISPM No. 2 - framework for pest risk analysis 2008, 29-43. Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention, Rome. 2009 ed.
36. FAO Interim commission on phytosanitary measures: excerpts from the report of the Conference of FAO (C97/REP), 29 1998, 7-18. Session, Rome, [November 1997, Appendix I: Interpretations as agreed by the fourteenth session of the Committee on Agriculture, ICPM-98/INF/1. Rome, August].
37. FAO (Food and Agriculture and Organization of the United Nations) International standards for phytosanitary measures 1 to 32. ISPM No. 11 - pest risk analysis for quarantine pests including analysis of environmental risk and living modified organisms 2004, 144-168. Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention, Rome. 2009 ed.
38. FAO (Food and Agriculture and Organization of the United Nations) International standards for phytosanitary measures. ISPM No. 5 - glossary of phytosanitary terms 2012, Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention, Rome, [27 pp.].
39. Fisher B., Turner K., Zylstra M., Brouwer R., de Groot R., Farber S., et al. Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecol Appl 2008, 18:2050-2067.
40. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 2009, 68:643-653.
41. Fonseca C.R., Ganade G. Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J Ecol 2001, 89:118-125.
42. Haack R.A., Hérard F., Sun J., Turgeon J.J. Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: a worldwide perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 2010, 55:521-546.
43. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. Environmental limits thresholds and sustainable development. BES Bull 2007, 38(2):22-24.
44. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. England's terrestrial ecosystem services and the rationale for an ecosystem approach. Overview report to Defra 2007, [89 pp.].
45. Hein L., van Koppen K., de Groot R.S., van Ierland E.C. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 2006, 57:209-228.
46. Henrichs T., Zurek M., Eickhout B., Kok K., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Ribeiro T., et al. Scenario development and analysis for forwardlooking ecosystem assessments. Ecosystems and human well-being - a manual for assessment practitioners 2010, Island Press, London. N. Ash, H. Blanco, C. Brown, K. Garcia, T. Henrichs, N. Lucas, C. Raudsepp-Hearne, R. David Simpson, R. Scholes, T. Tomich, B. Vira, M. Zurek (Eds.).
47. Hérard F., Ciampitti M., Maspero M., Krehan H., Benker U., Boegel C., et al. Anoplophora species in Europe: infestations and management processes. EPPO Bull 2006, 36:470-474.
48. Huston M. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 1997, 110:449-460.
49. IPCC Third Assessment report 2001, IPCC, Geneva, [[Internet], [cited 2013 Jan 3] Available from: www.ipcc.ch]. IPCC Watson RT, Core Writing Team (Eds.).
50. Jørgensen S.E. Integration of Ecosystem Theories: A Pattern 2002, Kluwer Academic Publication, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 400 pp. Third ed.
51. Kashio T. Microbial control of the white spotted longicorn beetle, Anoplophora malasiaca, by the entomophagous fungus, Beauveria brongniartii in citrus orchards in Japan. FFTC book series 1996, 47:106-112. FFTC ASPAC, Taipei, Taiwan.
52. Kenis M., Auger-Rozenberg M.A., Roques A., Timms L., Péré C., Cock M., et al. Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol Invasions 2009, 11:21-45.
53. Kenis M., Bacher S., Baker R.H.A., Branquart E., Brunel S., Holt J., et al. New protocols to assess the environmental impact of pests in the EPPO decision-support scheme for pest risk analysis. Bull OEPP/EPPO Bull 2012, 42(1):21-27.
54. Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecol Lett 2005, 8:468-479.
55. Kremen C., Williams N.M., Aizen M.A., Gemmill-Herren B., LeBuhn G., Minckley R., et al. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 2007, 10:299-314.
56. Lingafelter S.W., Hoebeke E.R. Revision of Anoplophora (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) 2002, Entomol. Soc. Wash, Washington, DC, [236 pp.].
57. Loreau M., Naeem S., Inchausti P., Bengtsson J., Grime J.P., Hector A., et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 2001, 294:804-808.
58. Luck G.W., Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R. Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 2003, 18:331-336.
59. Luck G.W., Harrington R., Harrison P.A., Kremen C., Berry P.M., Bugter R., et al. Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience 2009, 59(3):223-235.
60. Maspero M., Jucker C., Colombo M. First record of Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera Cerambycidae Lamiinae Lamiini) in Italy. Bolletino di Zoologia agraria e di Bachicoltura 2007, 39:161-164. [Ser. II].
61. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington DC.
62. Naeem S. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv Biol 1998, 12:39-45.
63. Neuenschwander P., Murphy S.T., Coly E.V. Introduction of exotic parasitic wasps for the control of Lirimyza trifolii (Dipt., Agromyzidae) in Senegal. Trop Pest Manag 1987, 33:290-297.
64. Nienstedt K.M., Brock T.C.M., van Wensem J., Montforts M., Hart A., Aagaard A., et al. Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Sci Total Environ 2012, 415:31-38.
65. Parker I.M., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Goodell K., Wonham M., Kareiva P.M., et al. Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasion 1999, 1:3-19.
66. Pascal M., Le Guyader H., Simberloff D. Biological invasions and the conservation of biodiversity. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Des Epizooties 2010, 29:387-403.
67. Rosenfeld J.S. Logical fallacies in the assessment of functional redundancy. Conserv Biol 2002, 16:837-839.
68. Sabbatini Peverieri G.S., Bertini G., Furlan P., Cortini G., Roversi P.F. Anoplophora chinensis (Forster) (Coleoptera Cerambycidae) in the outbreak site in Rome (Italy): experiences in dating exit holes. Redia 2012, XCV:89-92.
69. Sacco J. The attack of the urban forest eaters: how a dedicated and educated group of volunteers is responding to the invasion of Asian long-horn beetles and gypsy moths in Chicago. Proceedings 4th International Urban Wildlife Symposium 2004, [Internet. 2004 cited 2013 April 22 Available from: http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/adjunct/snr0704/snr07043k.pdf]. Shaw (Ed.).
70. Schrader G., Unger J.G. Plant quarantine as a measure against invasive alien species: the 285 framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the Plant Health Regulations in the 286 European Union. Biol Invasion 2003, 5(4):357-364.
71. Schwartz M.W., Brigham C.A., Hoeksema J.D., Lyons K.G., Mills M.H., van Mantgem P.J. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 2000, 122:297-305.
72. Smith R.L., Smith T.M. Elements of ecology 2006, Benjamin Cummings. 6th ed.
73. Srivastava S., Vellend M. Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation?. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2005, 36:267-294.
74. Tilman D., Reich P.B., Knops J., Wedin D., Mielke T., Lehman C. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 2001, 294:843-845.
75. Tilman D., Reich P.B., Knops J.M.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 2006, 441:629-632.
76. Tomich T.P., Argumedo A., Baste I., Camac E., Filer C., Garcia K. Conceptual frameworks for ecosystem assessment: their development, ownership, and use. Ecosystem and human well-being: a manual for assessment practitioners 2010, 71-113. Island Press, Washington, DC. N. Ash (Ed.).
77. UNEP The global environmental outlook 2002.
78. USDA (U.S.Department of Agriculture) Guidelines for plant pest risk assessment of imported fruit & vegetable commodities 2012, [Internet], [cited 2013 April 22, Available from: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/plant_imports/process/downloads/PRAGuidelines-ImportedFruitVegCommodities.pdf].
79. Van der Gaag D.J., Ciampitti M., Cavagna B., Maspero M., Hérard F. Pest risk analysis for Anoplophora chinensis. Plant protection service, the Netherlands [Internet], [cited 2013 April 22 Available from:]. http://library.wur.nl/ebooks/1885182.pdf.
80. Van der Gaag D.J., Sinatra G., Roversi P.F., Loomans A., Hérard F., Vukadin A. Evaluation of eradication measures against Anoplophora chinensis in early stage infestations in Europe. EPPO Bull 2010, 40(2):176-187.
81. Vanderwalle M., Sykes M.T., Harrison P.A., Luck G.W., Berry P., Bugter R., et al. Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services 2008, Rubicode Project [Internet], [cited 2013 Jan 3; 21 pp. Available from: www.rubicode.net/rubicode/outputs.html. 94 pp.].
82. Victor P.A. Indicators of sustainable development: some lessons from capital theory. Ecol Econ 1991, 4:191-213.
83. Vilà M., Basnou C., Pysek P., Josefsson M., Genovesi P., Gollasch S., et al. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Environ 2010, 8:135-144.
84. Vilà M., Espinar J.L., Hejda M., Hulme P.E., Jarosik V., Maron J.L., et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 2011, 14:702-708.
85. Violle C., Jiang L. Towards a trait-based quantification of species niche. J Plant Ecol 2009, 2:87-93.
86. Violle C., Navas M.L., Vile D., Kazakou E., Fortunel C., Hummel I., et al. Let the concept of trait be functional!. Oikos 2007, 116:882-892.
87. Walker B.H. Biological diversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol 1992, 6:18-23.
88. Walker B.H., Salt D. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world 2006, Island Press, Washington D.C.
89. Wallace K.J. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Conserv 2007, 139:235-246.
90. Western D. Human-modified ecosystems and future evolution. PNAS 2001, 98(10):5458-5465.
91. Yasui H., Akino T., Yasuda T., Fukaya M., Ono H., Wakamura S. Ketone components in the contact sex pheromone of the white-spotted longicorn beetle, Anoplophora malasiaca, and pheromonal activity of synthetic ketones. Entomol Exp Appl 2003, 107:167-176.
92. Zurek M.B., Henrichs T. Linking scenarios across scales in international environmental scenarios. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 2007, 74:1282-1295.