The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 32, Issue , 2007, Pages 67-98

  Brauman, Kate A ^a   Daily, Gretchen C ^a   Duarte, T Ka'eo ^b   Mooney, Harold A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecosystem valuation; Environmental policy; Flood control; Freshwater; Hydrology; Land management; Water supply

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FRESHWATER; LAND MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FLOOD CONTROL; HYDROLOGY; LAND USE; PUBLIC POLICY; WATER SUPPLY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

EID: 37049006479     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758     Document Type: Article

References (185)

1. Millenn. Ecosyst. Assess. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Our Human Planet. Washington, DC: Island
2. Balmford A, Bond W. 2005. Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecol. Lett. 8:1218-34
3. Mooney HA, Ehrlich PR. 1997. Ecosystem services: a fragmentary history. See Ref. 13, pp. 11-19
4. Bass S. 2006. Environment for the MDGS: An IIED Briefing. London: Int. Inst. Econ. Dev.
5. The Katoomba Group. 2004. Ecosystem, marketplace. Accessed Jan. 15, 2007. http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com
6. Carpenter SR, DeFries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, et al. 2006. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: research needs. Science 314:257-58
7. Feen RH, 1996. Keeping the balance: ancient Greek philosophical concerns with population and environment. Popul. Environ. 17:447-458
8. Norgaard RB. 1994. Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Co-Evolutionary Revisioning of the Future. New York: Routledge
9. Dearmont D, McCarl BA, Tolman DA. 1998. Costs of water treatment due to diminished water quality: a case study in Texas. Water Resour. Res. 34:849-53
10. Boyd J, Banzhaf S. 2006. What Are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Accounting Units. Discuss. Pap. 06-02. Resour. Future, Washington, DC
11. Daily GC, Soderqvist T, Aniyar S, Arrow K, Dasgupta P, et al. 2000. The value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289:395-96
12. Falkenmark M, Gottschalk L, Lundqvist J, Wouters P. 2004. Towards integrated catchment management: increasing the dialogue between scientists, policy-makers and stakeholders. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 20:297-309
13. Daily GC, ed. 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Tsland. 392 pp.
14. Eamus D, Macinnis-Ng CMO, Hose GC, Zeppel MJB, Taylor DT, Murray BR. 2005. Ecosystem services: an ecophysiological examination. Aust. J. Bot. 53:1-19
15. Boyd JW, Banzhaf HS. 2005. Ecosystem services and government accountability: the need for a new way of judging nature's value. Resources Summer:16-19
16. Postel SL, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. 1996. Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271:785-88
17. Old T, Kanae S. 2006. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 313:1068-72
18. Schcffer M., Holmgren M, Brovkin V, Claussen M. 2005. Synergy between small- and large-scale feedbacks of vegetation on the water cycle. Glob. Change Biol. 11:1003-12
19. Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2000. Ecohydrology: a hydrologic perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 36:3-9
20. Moorcroft PR. 2003. Recent advances in ecosystem-atmosphere interactions: an ecological perspective. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 270:1215-27
21. Betts AK, Ball JH, Beljaars ACM, Miller MJ, Viterbo PA. 1996. The land surface-atmosphere interaction: a review based on observational and global modeling perspectives. J Geophys Res. Atmos. 101:7209-25
22. Gordon LJ, Steffen W, Jonsson BF, Folke C, Falkenmark M, Johannessen A. 2005. Human modification of global water vapor flows from the land surface. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:7612-17
23. Feddema JJ. 2005. The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science 310:1674-78
24. Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35:257-84
25. Wilcox BP, Owens MK, Dugas WA, Ueckert DN, Hart CR. 2006. Shrubs, streamflow, and the paradox of scale. Hydrol. Process. 20:3245-59
26. Thomas RB, Megahan WF. 1998. Peak flow responses to clear-cutting and roads in small and large basins, western Cascades, Oregon: a second opinion. Water Resour. Res. 34:3393-403
27. Birkinshaw SJ, Bathurst JC. 2006. Model study of the relationship between sediment yield and river basin area. Earth Sutf. Process. Landf. 31:750-61
28. Bruijnzeel LA. 2004. Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 104:185-228
29. Newman BD, Wilcox BP, Archer SR, Breshears DD, Dahm CN, et al. 2006. Ecohydrology of water-limited environments: a scientific vision. Water Resour. Res. 42:W06302
30. Wullschleger SD, Meinzer FC, Vertessy RA. 1998. A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiol. 18:499-512
31. Dawson TE. 1998. Fog in the California redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecologia 117:476-85
32. Ingraham NL, Matthews RA. 1995. The importance of fog-drip water to vegetation: Point-Reyes Peninsula, California. J. Hydrol. 164:269-85
33. Storck P, Lettenmaier DP, Bolton SM. 2002. Measurement of snow interception and canopy effects on snow accumulation and melt in a mountainous maritime climate, Oregon, United States. Water Resour. Res. 38:1223
34. Gelfan AN, Pomeroy JW, Kuchment LS. 2004. Modeling forest cover influences on snow accumulation, sublimation, and melt. J. Hydrottteteorol. 5:785-803
35. Koivusalo H, Kokkonen T. 2002. Snow processes in a forest clearing and in a coniferous forest. J. Hydrol. 262:145-64
36. Falkenmark M. 2000. Competing freshwater and ecological services in the river basin perspective: an expanded conceptual framework. Water Int. 25:172-77
37. Calder IR. 1998. Water use by forests, limits and controls. Tree Physiol. 18:625-31
38. Scott RL, Shuttleworth WJ, Goodrich DC, Maddock T. 2000. The water use of two dominant vegetation communities in a semiarid riparian ecosystem. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 105:241-56
39. Andreassian V. 2004. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. J. Hydrol. 291:1-27
40. Bosch JM, Hewlett JD. 1982. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapo-transpiration. J. Hydrol. 55:3-23
41. Farley KA, Jobbagy EG., Jackson RB. 2005. Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy. Glob. Change Biol. 11:1565-76
42. Sahin V, Hall MJ. 1996. The effects of afforestation and deforestation on water yields. J. Hydrol. 178:293-309
43. Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR. 2001. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour. Res. 37:701-8
44. von Randow C, Manzi AO, Kruijt B, de Oliveira PJ, Zanchi FB, et al. 2004. Comparative measurements and seasonal variations in energy and carbon exchange over forest and pasture in South West Amazonia. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 78:5-26
45. Sandstrom K. 1998. Can forests "provide" water: widespread myth or scientific reality? Ambio 27:132-38
46. Vertessy RA, Watson FGR, O'Sullivan SK. 2001. Factors determining relations between stand age and catchment water balance in mountain ash forests. Forest Ecol. Manag. 143:13-26
47. Irvine J, Law BE, Kurpius MR, Anthoni PM, Moore D, Schwarz PA. 2004. Age-related changes in ecosystem structure and function and effects on water and carbon exchange in ponderosa pine. Tree Physiol. 24:753-63
48. Giambelluca TW. 2002. Hydrology of altered tropical forest. Hydrol. Process. 16:1665-69
49. Calder IR, Dye P. 2001. Hydrological impacts of invasive alien plants. Land Use Water Resour. Res. 1:1-12
50. Viaud V, Merot P, Baudry J. 2004. Hydrochemical buffer assessment in agricultural landscapes: from local to catchment scale. Environ. Manag. 34:559-73
51. Kirchner JW, Feng XH, Neal C. 2000. Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments. Nature 403:524-27
52. Naiman RJ, Decamps H. 1997, The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:621-58
53. Mitsch WJ, Day JW, Gilliam JW, Groffman PM, Hey DL, et al. 2001. Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. BioScience 51:373-88
54. Worrall F, Swank WT, Burt TP. 2003. Changes in stream nitrate concentrations due to land management practices, ecological succession, and climate: developing a systems approach to integrated catchment response. Water Resour. Res. 39:1177
55. Croke JC, Hairsine PB. 2006. Sediment delivery in managed forests: a review. Environ. Rev. 14:59-87
56. Reid KD, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, MacDonald L. 1999. Runoff and erosion in a pinon-juniper woodland: Influence of vegetation patches. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:1869-79
57. Sweeney BW, Bott TL, Jackson JK, Kaplan LA, Newbold JD, et al. 2004. Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:14132-37
58. Dosskey MG. 2001. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land. Environ. Manag. 28:577-98
59. Sabater S, Butturini A, Clement JC, Burt T, Dowrick D, et al. 2003. Nitrogen removal by riparian buffers along a European climatic gradient: patterns and factors of variation. Ecosystems 6:20-30
60. Kvesitadze G, Khatisashvili G, Sadunishvili T, Ramsden JJ. 2006. Biochemical Mechanisms of Detoxification in Higher Plants: Basis of Phytoremediation. New York: Springer
61. Anderson TA, Guthrie EA, Walton BT. 1993. Bioremediation in the rhizosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27:2630-36
62. Brix H. 1994. Use of constructed wetlands in water-pollution control: historical development, present status, and future perspectives. Water Sci. Technol. 30:209-23
63. Sundaravadivel M, Vigneswaran S. 2001. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31:351-409
64. Gyssels G, Poesen J, Bochet E, Li Y. 2005. Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review. Prog. Phys. Geogt: 29:189-217
65. Hall RL, Calder IR. 1993. Drop size modification by forest canopies: measurements using a disdrometer. J. Geophys. Res. Amos. 98:18465-70
66. Keim RF, Skaugset AE. 2003. Modeling effects of forest canopies on slope stability. Hydrol. Process. 17:1457-67
67. Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol. Appl. 8:559-68
68. Aber JD, Goodale CL, Ollinger SV, Smith ML, Magill AH, et al. 2003. Is nitrogen deposition altering the nitrogen status of northeastern forests? BioScience 53:375-89
69. Ward JV. 1989. The 4-dimensional nature of lotie ecosystems. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 8:2-8
70. Chandler DG. 2006. Reversibility of forest conversion impacts on water budgets in tropical karst terrain. Forest Ecol. Manag. 224:95-103
71. La Marche JL, Lettenmaier DP. 2001. Effects of forest roads on flood flows in the Deschutes River, Washington. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 26:115-34
72. Le Maitre DC, Scott DF, Colvin C. 1999. A review of information on interactions between vegetation and groundwater. Water South Africa 25:137-52
73. Ludwig JA, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Tongway DJ, Imeson AC. 2005. Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscapes. Ecology 86:288-97
74. Caldwell MM, Dawson TE, Richards JH. 1998. Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia 113:151-61
75. Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Turin HJ. 2003. Hydraulic conductivity in a pinon-juniper woodland: Influence of vegetation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:1243-49
76. Belnap J. 2006. The potential roles of biological soil crusts in dryland hydrologic cycles. Hydrol. Process. 20:3159-78
77. Tabacchi E, Lambs L, Guilloy H, Planty-Tabacchi AM, Muller E, Decamps H. 2000. Impacts of riparian vegetation on hydrological processes. Hydrol. Process. 14:2959-76
78. Jones JA, Post DA. 2004. Seasonal and successional streamflow response to forest cutting and regrowth in the northwest and eastern United States. Water Resour. Res. 40:W05203
79. Sikka AK, Samra JS, Sharda VN, Samraj P, Lakshmanan V. 2003. Low flow and high flow responses to converting natural grassland into bluegum (Eucalyptus globulus) in Nilgiris watersheds of South India. J. Hydrol. 270:12-26
80. Bond BJ, Jones JA, Moore G, Phillips N, Post D, McDonnell JJ. 2002. The zone of vegetation influence on baseflow revealed by diel patterns of streamflow and vegetation water use in a headwater basin. Hydrol. Process. 16:1671-77
81. Peel MC, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL, Watson FGR. 2002. Implications of the relationship between catchment vegetation type and the variability of annual runoff. Hydrol. Process. 16:2995-3002
82. Brown AE, Zhang L, McMahon TA, Western AW, Vertessy RA. 2005. A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. J. Hydrol. 310:28-61
83. Smakhtin VU. 2001. Low flow hydrology: a review. J. Hydrol. 240:147-86
84. Guillemette F, Plamondon AP, Prevost M, Levesque D. 2005. Rainfall generated storm-flow response to clearcutting a boreal forest: peak flow comparison with 50 world-wide basin studies. J. Hydrol. 302:137-53
85. Jones JA, Cirant GE. 1996. Peak flow responses to clear-cutting and roads in small and large basins, western Cascades, Oregon. Water Resour. Res. 32:959-74
86. Darby SE. 1999. Effect of riparian vegetation on flow resistance and flood potential. J. Hydraul. Eng. 125:443-54
87. Bullock A, Acreman M. 2003. The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle. Hydrol. Earth System Sci. 7:358-89
88. H.John Heinz III Cent. Sci. Econ. Environ., ed. 2002. The State of the Nation's Ecosystems: Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
89. Revenga C, Murray S, AbramovitzJ, Hammond A. 1998. Watersheds of the World: Ecological Value and Vulnerability, Washington, DC: World Resour. Inst./Worldwatch Inst.
90. Millenn. Ecosyst. Assess., ed. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Island
91. Alcamo J, van Vuuren D, Ringler C, Cramer W, Masui T, et al. 2005. Changes in nature's balance sheet: model-based estimates of future worldwide ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 10:e 19. http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol10/iss2/art19
92. Meyerson LA, Baron J, Melillo JM, Naiman RJ, O'Malley RI, et al. 2005. Aggregate measures of ecosystem services: Can we take the pulse of nature? Front. Ecol. Environ. 3:56-59
93. Kremen C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol. Lett. 8:468-79
94. Stednick JD. 1996. Monitoring the effects of timber harvest on annual water yield. J. Hydrol. 176:79-95
95. Verhoeven JTA, Arheimer B, Yin CQ, Hefting MM. 2006. Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:96-103
96. Zimmermann B, Elsenbeer H, De Moraes JM. 2006. The influence of land-use changes on soil hydraulic properties: implications for runoff generation. Forest Ecol. Manag. 222:29-38
97. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591-96
98. Zedler JB, Kercher S. 2005. Wedand resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30:39-74
99. Gorgens AHM, van Wilgen BW. 2004. Invasive alien plants and water resources in South Africa: current understanding, predictive ability and research challenges. S. Aft. J. Sci. 100:27-33
100. Hansson LA, Bronmark C, Nilsson PA, Abjornsson K. 2005. Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: nutrient retention, biodiversity or both? Freshw. Biol. 50:705-14
101. Likens GE, Bormann FH, Johnson NM, Fisher DW, Pierce RS. 1970. Effects of forest cutting and herbicide treatment on nutrient budgets in Hubbard Brook watershedecosystem. Ecol. Monogt: 40:23-47
102. Falkenmark M, Rockstrom J. 2006. The new blue and green water paradigm: Breaking new ground for water resources planning and management. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 132:129-32
103. Rodriguez JP, Beard TD Jr, Bennett EM, Gumming GS, Cork SJ, et al. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 11:e28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28
104. Jackson RB, Jobbagy EG, Avissar R, Roy SB, Barrett DJ, et al. 2005. Trading water for carbon with biological sequestration. Science 310:1944-47
105. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570-74
106. Richardson DM. 1998. Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv. Biol. 12:18-26
107. LoGiudice K, Ostfeld RS, Schmidt KA, Keesing F. 2003. The ecology of infectious disease: effects of host diversity and community composition on Lyme disease risk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:567-71
108. DeFries RS, Foley JA, Asner GP. 2004. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front. Ecol. Environ, 2:249-57
109. Baron JS, Poff NL, Angermeier PL, Dahm CN, Gleick PH, et al. 2002. Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater. Ecol. Appl. 12:1247-60
110. Natl. Res. Counc. 2000. Watershed Management for Potable Water Supply: Assessing the New York City Strategy. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
111. Gleick PH, Cooley H. 2006. The World's Water 2006-2007: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. Washington, DC: Island. 388 pp.
112. Vorosmarty CJ, Leveque C, Revenga C. 2005. Fresh water. See Ref. 90, pp. 165-207
113. Dasgupta P. 1998. The economics of poverty in poor countries. Scand. J. Econ. 100:41-68
114. Gadgil M, Guha R. 1995. Ecology and Equity: The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India. London, UK: Routledge. 213 pp.
115. Imhoff ML, Bounoua L, Ricketts T, Loucks C, Harriss R, Lawrence WT. 2004. Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production. Nature 429:870-73
116. Levin S. 1999. Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons. Reading, MA: Perseus
117. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC. 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 4:e379
118. Naidoo R, Ricketts TH. 2006. Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol. 4:e360
119. Vitousek PM, Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, Matson PA. 1986. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience 36:368-73
120. Postel SL. 2003. Securing water for people, crops, and ecosystems: new mindset and new priorities. Nat. Resour. Forum 27:89-98121.
121. Maass JM, Balvanera P, Castillo A, Daily GC, Mooney HA, et al. 2005. Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecol. Soc. 10:e17. http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol10/iss1/art17
122. Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 57:209-28
123. Calder IR. 2004. Forests and water-closing the gap between public and science perceptions. Water Sci. Technol. 49:39-53
124. Heal G. 2000. Nature and the Marketplace: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem. Services. Washington, DC: Island. 203 pp.
125. Krutilla JV. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:777-86
126. Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 41:375-92
127. Pagiola S, von Ritter K, Bishop J. 2004. Assessing the economic value of ecosystem conservation. Environ. Dep. Pap. 101. World Bank Environ. Dep., Washington, DC
128. Costanza R, d'Arge R, Groot Rd, Farber S, Grasso M, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-60
129. Turner RK. 1998. Ecosystem services value, research needs, and policy relevance: a commentary. Ecol. Econ. 25:61-65
130. Bockstael NE, Freeman AM, Kopp RJ, Portney PR, Smith VK. 2000. On measuring economic values for nature. Environ, Sci. Technol. 34:1384-89
131. Turner RK, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Georgiou S. 2003. Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol. Econ. 46:493-510
132. Limburg KE, O'Neill RV, Costanza R, Farber S. 2002, Complex systems and valuation. Ecol. Econ. 41:409-20
133. Chomitz KM, Kumari K. 1998. The domestic benefits of tropical forests: a critical review. World Bank Res. Obs. 13:13-35
134. Kremen C, Niles JO, Dalton MG, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, et al. 2000. Economic incentives for rain forest conservation across scales. Science 288:1828-32
135. Heal G. 1998. Valuing the Future. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. 226 pp.
136. Pearce D, Groom B, Hepburn C, Koundouri P. 2003. Valuing the future: recent advances in social discounting. World Econ. 4:121-41
137. Cairns J, van der Pol M. 2000. Valuing future private and social benefits: the discounted utility model versus hyperbolic discounting models. J. Econ. Psychol. 21:191-205
138. Loewenstein G, Prelec D. 1992. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and interpretation. In Choice Over Time. New York: Russell Sage Found.
139. Azfar O. 1999. Rationalizing hyperbolic discounting. J. Econ. Behavior Organ. 38:245-52
140. Harvey CM. 1995. Proportional discounting of future costs and benefits. Math. Oper. Res. 20:381-99
141. Newell RG, Pizer WA. 2003. Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 46:52-71
142. Heal G, 2000. Valuing ecosystem services. Ecosystems 3:24-30
143. Freeman AM III. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, DC: Resour. Future. 496 pp. 2nd ed.
144. Smith VK. 1993. Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources: an interpretive appraisal. Land Econ. 69:219-53
145. Natl. Res. Counc. 2004. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Towards Better Environmental Decision Making. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
146. de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 41:393-408
147. Straton A. 2006. A complex systems approach to the value of ecological resources. Ecol. Econ. 56:402-11
148. Barbier E.B. 2007. Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ. Policy 49:178-229
149. Wilson MA, Carpenter SR. 1999. Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971-1997. Ecol. Appl. 9:772-83
150. Echavarria M. 2000. Valuation of Water-Related Services to Downstream Users in Rural Watersheds: Determining Values for the Use and Protection of Water Resources. Rome, Italy: UN Food Agric. Organ. (UN FAO)
151. Leggett CG, Bockstael NE. 2000. Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 39:121-44
152. Carson RT, Mitchell RC, Hanemann M, Kopp RJ, Presser S, Ruud PA. 2003. Contingent valuation and lost passive use: damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environ. Resour. Econ. 25:257-86
153. Pattanayak SK. 2004. Valuing watershed services: concepts and empirics from Southeast Asia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 104:171-84
154. Rein FA. 1999. An economic analysis of vegetative buffer strip implementation - case study: Elkhorn Slough, Monterey Bay, California. Coast. Manag. 27:377-90
155. Brody WEHSD. 2006. Price of permits: measuring the economic impacts of wetland development on flood damages in Florida. Natural Hazards Rev. 7:123-30
156. Kaiser B, Roumasset J. 2002. Valuing indirect ecosystem services: the case of tropical watersheds. Environ. Dev. Econ, 7:701-14
157. Guo ZW, Xiao XM, Li DM. 2000. An assessment of ecosystem services: water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecol. Appl. 10:925-36
158. Nunez D, Nahuelhual L, Oyarzun C. 2006. Forests and water: the value of native temperate forests in supplying water for human consumption. Ecol. Econ. 58:606-16
159. Woodward RT, Wui YS. 2001. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Earn. 37:257-70
160. Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, et al. 2001. Water in a changing world. Ecol. Appl. 11:1027-45
161. Murray BR, Hose GC, Eamus D, Licari D. 2006. Valuation of groundwater-dependent ecosystems: a functional methodology incorporating ecosystem services. Aust. J. Bot. 54:221-29
162. UN Food Agric. Organ. (UN FAO). 2002. Land-water linkages in rural watersheds: proceedings of the electronic workshop. FAO Land Water Bull. 9:1-78
163. Scheffer M, Brock W, Westley F. 2000. Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services: an interdisciplinary theoretical analysis. Ecosystems 3:451-71
164. Brismar A. 2002. River systems as providers of goods and services: a basis for comparing desired and undesired effects of large dam projects. Environ, Manag. 29:598-609
165. Falkenmark M. 2004. Towards integrated catchment management: opening the paradigm locks between hydrology, ecology and policy-making. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 20:275-81
166. Salzman J. 2005. Creating markets for ecosystem services: notes from the field. N. Y. Univ. Law Rev. 80:870-961
167. UN Food Agric. Organ. (UN FAO). 2004. Electronic forum on payment schemes for environmental services in watersheds. UN FAO/Lat. Am. Netw. Tech. Coop. Watershed Manag. (REDLACH), Rep., Santiago, http://www.rlc.fao.org/foro/ psa/pdf/report.pdf
168. Pagiola S, Agostini P, GobbiJ, de Haan C, Ibrahim M, et al. 2005. Paying for biodiversity conservation services: experience in Colombia, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua. Mountain Res. Dev. 25:206-11
169. Pagiola S, Bishop J, Landell-Mills N, eds. 2002. Selling Forest Environmental Services. Sterling, VA: Earthscan
170. Tognetti SS, Mendoza G, Aylward B, Southgate D, Garcia L. 2003. A Knowledge and Assessment Guide to Support the Development of PaymentArrangementsfor Watershed Ecosystem Services (PWES). Washington, DC: World Bank Environ. Dep.
171. Landell-Mills N, Porras IT. 2002. Silver Bullet or Fools' Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor. London: Int. Inst. Environ. Dev.
172. Heal G, Daily GC, Erlich PR, Salzman J, Boggs C, et al. 2001. Protecting natural capital through ecosystem service districts. Stanford Environ. Law J. 20:333-64
173. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. 2000. The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol. Econ. 35:25-33
174. Hayward B. 2005. From the Mountain to the Tap: How Land Use and Water Management Can Work for the Rural Poor. Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK: Dep. Int. Dev. For. Res. Program.
175. Daily GC, Ellison K. 2002. The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable. Washington, DC: Island
176. Postel SL, Thompson BH. 2005. Watershed protection: Capturing the benefits of nature's water supply services. Nat. Resour. Forum 29:98-108
177. Bonell M, Bruijnzeel LA, eds. 2005. Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics: Past, Present and Future Hydrological Research for Integrated Land and Water Management. Cambridge, UK: Ciambridge Univ. Press
178. Ferraro PJ, Simpson RD. 2002. The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Econ. 78:339-53
179. Zhang PC, Shao GF, Zhao G, Le Master DC, Parker GR, et al. 2000. China's forest policy for the 21st century. Science 288:2135-36
180. Uchida E, Xu JT, Rozelle S. 2005. Grain for green: cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China's conservation set-aside program. Land Econ. 81:247-64
181. Xu M, Qi Y, Gong P. 2000. China's new forest policy. Science 289:2049-50
182. Xu ZG, Xu JT, Deng XZ, Huang JK, Uchida E, Rozelle S. 2006. Grain for green versus grain: conflict between food security and conservation set-aside in China. World Dev. 34:130-48
183. Macdonald IAW. 2004. Recent research on alien plant invasions and their management in South Africa: a review of the inaugural research symposium of the Working for Water Programme. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100:21-26
184. Magadlela D, Mdzeke N. 2004. Social benefits in the Working for Water Programme as a public works initiative. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100:94-96
185. Evans D, Assoc. ECONorthwest. 2004. Comparative Valuation of Ecosystem Services: Lents Project Case Study. Portland, OR: City Portland Watershed Manag. Program