How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 135-144

  Vilà, Montserrat ^a   Basnou, Corina ^b   Pyšek, Petr ^c   Josefsson, Melanie ^d   Genovesi, Piero ^e   Gollasch, Stephan ^f   Nentwig, Wolfgang ^g   Olenin, Sergej ^h   Roques, Alain ⁱ   Roy, David ^j   Hulme, Philip E ^k   Andriopoulos, Pavlos ^l   Arianoutsou, Margarita ^l   Bazos, Ioannis ^l   Kokkoris, Ioannis ^l   Yannitsaros, Artemios ^l   Zikos, Andreas ^l   Augustin, Sylvie ^m   Cochard, Pierre Olivier ^m   Lopez Vaamonde, Carlos ^m   Sauvard, Daniel ^m   Yart, Annie ^m   Bacher, Sven ⁿ   Bretagnolle, François ^o   Gasquez, Jacques ^o   Chiron, François ^p   Kark, Salit ^p   Shirley, Susan ^p   Clergeau, Philippe ^q   Cocquempot, Christian ^r   Coeur d’Acier, Armelle ^r   Dorkeld, Franck ^r   Migeon, Alain ^r   Navajas, Maria ^r   David, Matej ^s   Delipetrou, Pinelopi ^l   Georghiou, Kyriakos ^l   Desprez Loustau, Marie Laure ^t   Didziulis, Viktoras ^h   Essl, Franz ^u   Galil, Bella S ^v   Hejda, Martin ^w   Jarosik, Vojtech ^w   Pergl, Jan ^w   Perglová, Irena ^w   Kühn, Ingolf ^x   Winter, Marten ^x   Kühn, Philip W ^y   Marcer, Arnald ^b   Pino, Joan ^b   McLoughlin, Mathew ^j   Minchin, Dan ^z   Panov, Vadim E ^aa   Pascal, Michel ⁱ   Poboljsaj, Katja ^ab   Scalera, Riccardo ^ac   Sedlácek, Ondrej ^c   Zagatti, Pierre ^ad   more..

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (Sweden)

^e Institute of Environmental Protection and Research   (Italy)

^f GoConsult   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^h KLAIPEDA UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

ⁱ CEMAGREF   (France)

^j CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^k LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^l UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^m Inst Natl de la Rech Agronom   (France)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^o UNIV BOURGOGNE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

^p HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^q CNRS   (France)

^r CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

^s UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^t UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

^u ENVIRONMENT AGENCY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

^v NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY   (Israel)

^w INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^x HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^y ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^z Killaloe Co Clare   (Ireland)

^aa ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^ab Center za Kartografijo Favne in Flore   (Slovenia)

^ac Oxfordshire ^*  (Italy)

^ad INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVERTEBRATE; PLANT; TAXONOMY; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM; VERTEBRATE;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; EUROPE; NORTH SEA;

INVERTEBRATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 77950787457     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/080083     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Andreu J, Vila M, and Hulme PE. 2009. An assessment of stakeholder perceptions and management of noxious alien plants in Spain. Environ Manage 43: 1244-1255
2. Bardsley D and Edwards-Jones G. 2006. Stakeholders' perceptions of the impacts of invasive exotic plant species in the Mediterranean region. GeoJournal 65: 199-210. (Pubitemid 44583624)
3. Belmonte J and Vila M. 2004- Atmospheric invasion of non-native pollen in the Mediterranean region. Am J Bot 91: 1243-1250 (Pubitemid 43175045)
4. Bertolino S and Genovesi P. 2007. Aquatic alien mammals introduced into Italy: impacts and control strategies. In: Gherardi F (Ed). Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
5. Binimelis R, Born W, Monterroso I, and Rodríguez-Labajos B. 2007. Socio-economic impacts and assessment of biological invasions. In: Nentwig N (Ed). Biological invasions. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
6. Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Duncan RP, et al. 2004. Avian extinction and mammalian introductions on oceanic islands. Science 305: 1955-1958 (Pubitemid 39287993)
7. Born W, Rauschmayer F, and Brauer I. 2005. Economic evaluation of biological invasions - a survey. Ecol Econ 55: 321-336 (Pubitemid 41460483)
8. Ciruna KA, Meyerson LA, and Gutierrez A. 2004. The ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species in inland water ecosystems. Washington, DC: Convention on Biological Diversity.
9. Colautti RI, Bailey SA, van Overdijk CDA, et al. 2006. Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada. Biol Invasions 8 : 45-59.
10. Cox JG and Lima SL. 2006. Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 674-680
11. Crall AW, Meyerson LA, Stohlgren TJ, et al. 2006. Show me the numbers: what data currently exist for non-native species in the USA ? Front Ecol Environ 4: 414-418
12. D'Antonio CM, Dudley TL, and Mack M. 1999. Disturbance and biological invasions: direct effects and feedbacks. In: Walker LR (Ed). Ecosystems of disturbed ground. New York, NY: Elsevier.
13. DAISIE. 2009. Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
14. Desprez-Loustau ML, Robin C, Buée M, et al. 2007. The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 472-480
15. Egoh B, Rouget M, Reyers B, et al. 2007. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecol Econ 63: 714-721 (Pubitemid 47030881)
16. Ehrenfeld JG. 2003. Effect of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6: 503-523
17. Galil BS and Zenetos A. 2002. A sea change - exotics in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, and Olenin S (Eds). Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impacts and management. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Galil B, Gollasch S, Minchin D, and Olenin O. 2009. Alien marine biota of Europe. In: DAISIE (Eds), Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
19. Gherardi F. 2007. Understanding the impact of invasive crayfish. In: Gherardi F (Ed). Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
20. Gollasch S and Rosenthal H. 2006. The Kiel Canal. In: Gollasch S, Galil BS, and Cohen A (Eds). Bridging divides - maritime canals as invasion corridors. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
21. Graham J, Simpson A, Crall AW, et al. 2008. Vision of a cyberinfrastructure for nonnative, invasive species management. BioScience 58: 263-268 (Pubitemid 351481625)
22. Grosholz E. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 22-27. (Pubitemid 34076723)
23. Hopkins CCE. 2002. Introduced marine organisms in Norwegian waters, including Svalbard. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, and Olenin S (Eds). Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impacts and management. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Hulme PE. 2006. Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43: 835-847
25. Hulme PE. 2007. Biological invasions in Europe: drivers, pressures, states, impacts and responses. In: Hester R and Harrison RM (Eds). Biodiversity under threat. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, et al. 2008. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework to better integrate pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45: 403-414 (Pubitemid 351406249)
27. Hulme PE, Roy DB, Cunha T, and Larsson T-B. 2009a. A panEuropean inventory of alien species: rationale, implementation and implications for managing biological invasions. In: DAISIE (Eds). Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
28. Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Nentwig W, and Vila M. 2009b. Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science 324: 40-41.
29. Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg MA, Roques A, et al. 2009. Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol Invasions 11: 21-45.
30. Knowler D. 2005. Reassessing the cost of biological invasion: Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Black Sea. Ecol Econ 52: 187-199
31. Kobelt M and Nentwig W 2008. Alien spider introductions to Europe supported by global trade. Divers Distrib 14: 273-280 (Pubitemid 351208159)
32. Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C, et al. 2008. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80: 101-148
33. Leppäkoski E, Olenin S, and Gollasch S. 2002. The Baltic Sea - a field laboratory for invasion biology. In: Leppakoski E, Gollasch S, and Olenin S (Eds). Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impacts and management. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Levine JM, Vila M, D'Antonio CM, et al. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impact of exotic plant invasions. Philos T Roy Soc B 270: 775-781
35. Liao C, Peng R, Luo Y, et al. 2007. Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177: 706-714
36. Long J L. 2003. Introduced mammals of the world: their history, distribution and influence. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
37. Lovell SJ, Stone SF, and Fernandez L. 2006. The economic impact of aquatic invasive species: a review of the literature. Agr Res Econ Rev 35: 195-208. (Pubitemid 43844472)
38. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystem and well-being. A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
39. Meyerson LA, Baron J, Melillo JM, et al. 2005. Aggregate measures of ecosystem services: can we take the pulse of nature? Front Ecol Environ 3: 56-59.
40. Occhipinti-Ambrogi A and Galil BS. 2004. A uniform terminology on bioinvasions: a chimera or an operative tool? Mar Poll Bull 49: 688-694
41. Olson LJ. 2006. The economics of terrestrial invasive species: a review of the literature. Agr Res Econ Rev 35: 178-194
42. OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1993. Harmful nonindigenous species in the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
43. Panzacchi M, Bertolino S, Cocchi R, et al, 2007. Population control of coypu Myocostor coypus in Italy compared to eradication in UK: a cost-benefit analysis. Wildlife Biol 13: 159-171 (Pubitemid 47279941)
44. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, et al. 1999. Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1: 3-19.
45. Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, et al. 2001, Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agr Ecosyst Environ 84: 1-20. (Pubitemid 32164022)
46. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, and Morrison D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52: 273-288 (Pubitemid 40307254)
47. Pyšek P, Cock MJW, Nentwig W, and Ravn HP (Eds). 2007. Ecology and management of giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). Wallingford, UK: CABI.
48. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, et al. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53: 131-143
49. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, et al. 2008. Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 237-244 (Pubitemid 351626202)
50. Reinhardt F, Herle M, Basriansen F, et al. 2003. Economic impact of the spread of alien species in Germany. Berlin, Germany: Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt).
51. Roques A, Rabitsch W, Lopez-Vaamonde C, et al. 2009. Alien terrestrial invertebrates of Europe, In: DAISIE (Eds). Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
52. Scalera R and Zaghi D. 2004- Alien species and nature conservation in the EU. The role of the LIFE program. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
53. Traveset A and Richardson DM. 2006, Biological invasions as disruptors of plant-animal reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 208-216
54. Travis J. 1993. Invader threatens Black, Azov Seas. Science 262: 1366-1367 (Pubitemid 24035054)
55. van der Gaag DJ. 2007. Report workshop management of Anoplophora, 22-24 Nov 2006, Wageningen, Netherlands, www. minlnv.nl/cdlpub/servlet/CDLServlet?p- file-id=22662. Viewed 4 Mar 2010.
56. Vilà M, Weber E, and D'Antonio CM. 2000. Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol Invasions 2: 207-217 (Pubitemid 32235141)
57. Vilà M, Williamson M, and Lonsdale M. 2004. Competition experiments on alien weeds with crops: lessons for measuring invasive impact? Biol Invasions 6: 59-69. (Pubitemid 38162287)
58. Vilà M. 2008. Pitas y chumberas: un caso espinoso. In: Vilà MF, Valladares A, Traveset A, et al. (Eds). Invasiones biológicas. Madrid, Spain: CSIC-Divulgación.
59. Weidema I. 2006. Invasive alien fact sheet. Online database of the North European and Baltic Network on IAS. www.nobanis.org Viewed 4 Mar 2010.
60. White PCL and Harris S. 2002. Economic and environmental costs of alien vertebrate species in Britain. In: Pimentel D (Ed). Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal and microbe species. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
61. Williamson M. 2002. Alien plants in the British Isles. In: Pimentel D (Ed). Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal and microbe species. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.