Anharmonicity, solvation forces, and resolution in atomic force microscopy at the solid-liquid interface

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Voïtchovsky, Kislon ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; INTERFACIAL LIQUIDS; MOLECULAR RESOLUTION; NONLINEAR TRANSITION; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; SOLID-LIQUID INTERFACES; STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS; SUBNANOMETER RESOLUTION;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIQUIDS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PROBES; SOLVATION;

PHASE INTERFACES;

EID: 84884237484     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.022407     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. T. Ohara and D. Suzuki, Microscale Thermophys. Eng. MTENFP 1089-3954 10.1080/10893950050148142 4, 189 (2000).
2. M. Hugelmann, P. Hugelmann, W. Lorenz, and W. Schindler, Surf. Sci. SUSCAS 0039-6028 10.1016/j.susc.2004.08.045 597, 156 (2005).
3. H. Frauenfelder, P. Fenimore, G. Chen, and B. McMahon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0607168103 103, 15469 (2006).
4. J.-M. Andanson and A. Baiker, Chem. Soc. Rev. CSRVBR 0306-0012 10.1039/b919544k 39, 4571 (2010).
5. G. Whitesides and P. Laibinis, Langmuir LANGD5 0743-7463 10.1021/la00091a013 6, 87 (1990).
6. L. Gao and T. McCarthy, Langmuir LANGD5 0743-7463 10.1021/la902206c 25, 14105 (2009).
7. K. Wandelt and S. Thurgate, Solid-Liquid Interfaces: Macroscopic Phenomena, Microscopic Understanding (Springer, Berlin, 2003).
8. P. Fenter and N. Sturchio, Prog. Surf. Sci. PSSFBP 0079-6816 10.1016/j.progsurf.2004.12.001 77, 171 (2004).
9. D. Chandler, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature04162 437, 640 (2005).
10. N. Giovambattista, P. Debenedetti, and P. Rossky, J. Phys. Chem. C JPCCCK 1932-7447 10.1021/jp065419b 111, 1323 (2007).
11. T. Fukuma, Y. Ueda, S. Yoshioka, and H. Asakawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.016101 104, 016101 (2010).
12. K. H. Sheikh and S. P. Jarvis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. JACSAT 0002-7863 10.1021/ja2068142 133, 18296 (2011).
13. K. Voïtchovsky, J. J. Kuna, S. A. Contera, E. Tosatti, and F. Stellacci, Nat. Nanotechnol. NNAABX 1748-3387 10.1038/nnano.2010.67 5, 401 (2010).
14. S. de Beer, D. van den Ende, and F. Mugele, Nanotechnology NNOTER 0957-4484 10.1088/0957-4484/21/32/325703 21, 325703 (2010).
15. R. Garcia and E. T. Herruzo, Nat. Nanotechnol. NNAABX 1748-3387 10.1038/nnano.2012.38 7, 217 (2012).
16. X. Xu, J. Melcher, S. Basak, R. Reifenberger, and A. Raman, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.060801 102, 060801 (2009).
17. A. F. Payam, J. R. Ramos, and R. Garcia, ACS Nano ANCAC3 1936-0851 10.1021/nn2048558 6, 4663 (2012).
18. A. Raman, S. Trigueros, A. Cartagena, A. P. Z. Stevenson, M. Susilo, E. Nauman, and S. A. Contera, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10.1038/nnano.2011.186 6, 809 (2011).
19. S. D. Solares, J. Appl. Phys. JAPIAU 0021-8979 10.1063/1.3692393 111, 054909 (2012).
20. O. Sahin, S. Magonov, C. Su, C. F. Quate, and O. Solgaard, Nat. Nanotechnol. NNAABX 1748-3387 10.1038/nnano.2007.226 2, 507 (2007).
21. Although subtleties may arise for the different feedback modes, the argument should generally remain valid.
22. S. V. Patil and P. Hoffmann, Adv. Eng. Mater. AENMFY 1438-1656 10.1002/adem.200500054 7, 707 (2005).
23. J. E. Sader and S. P. Jarvis, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.195424 74, 195424 (2006).
24. J. Melcher, S. Hu, and A. Raman, Rev. Sci. Instrum. RSINAK 0034-6748 10.1063/1.2938864 79, 061301 (2008).
25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/ PhysRevE.88.022407 for a full description of the data analysis, control experiments, and additional discussions.
26. J. Zhao, B. Zhou, B. Liu, and W. Guo, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. JCTNAB 1546-1955 10.1166/jctn.2009.1163 6, 1181 (2009).
27. L. E. McNeil and M. Grimsditch, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/5/11/008 5, 1681 (1993).
28. L. Picas, F. Rico, and S. Scheuring, Biophys. J. BIOJAU 0006-3495 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4001 102, L01 (2012).
29. The different W values given here were calculated from SA-AFM data using a procedure described elsewhere [13].
30. M. Ricci, P. Spijker, F. Stellacci, J.-F. Molinari, and K. Voïtchovsky, Langmuir LANGD5 0743-7463 10.1021/la3044736 29, 2207 (2013).
31. K. Voïtchovsky and M. Ricci, Proc. SPIE 10.1117/12.905864 8232, 823200 (2012).
32. R. Garcia, C. J. Gómez, N. F. Martinez, S. Patil, C. Dietz, and R. Magerle, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.016103 97, 016103 (2006).
33. T. Fukuma, M. J. Higgins, and S. P. Jarvis, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.106101 98, 106101 (2007).
34. J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed. (Academic, London, 1992).
35. H. V. Guzman, A. P. Perrino, and R. Garcia, ACS Nano 10.1021/nn4012835 7, 3198 (2013).