Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 18, 2013, Pages 6541-6563

  Radhakrishnan, Kirthi ^a   Bader, Kenneth B ^b   Haworth, Kevin J ^b   Kopechek, Jonathan A ^a   Raymond, Jason L ^a   Huang, Shao Ling ^c   McPherson, David D ^c   Holland, Christy K ^a,b  

^a University of Cincinnati   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAVITATION THRESHOLDS; CLINICAL APPLICATION; ECHOGENIC LIPOSOMES; INERTIAL CAVITATION THRESHOLD; PASSIVE CAVITATION DETECTION; PRESSURE AMPLITUDES; THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION; ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENT;

LIPOSOMES;

CAVITATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; FLUOROCARBON; LIPID; LIPOSOME; PERFLUTREN;

ACOUSTICS; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MICROBUBBLE; PRESSURE; ULTRASOUND; DEVICES; PROCEDURES;

ACOUSTICS; ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FLUOROCARBONS; HUMANS; LIPIDS; LIPOSOMES; MICROBUBBLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PRESSURE; SOFTWARE; SONICATION; ULTRASONICS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 84884157608     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/18/6541     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Akulichev V 1971 Pulsations of cavitation voids High-Intensity Ultrason. Fields ed L D Rozenberg (New York: Plenum) pp 239-59
2. Ammi A Y, Cleveland R O, Mamou J, Wang G I, Bridal S L and O'Brien W D Jr 2006 Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 53 126-35 (Pubitemid 43265794)
3. Andersen K S and Jensen J A 2009 Ambient pressure sensitivity of microbubbles investigated through a parameter study J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126 3350-8
4. Apfel R E and Holland C K 1991 Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound Ultrasound Med. Biol. 17 179-85
5. Atchley A A, Frizzell L A, Apfel R E, Holland C K, and Madanshetty S and Roy R A 1988 Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound Ultrasonics 26 280-5
6. Bader K B and Holland C K 2013 Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents Phys. Med. Biol. 58 127-44
7. Bazan-Peregrino M, Arvanitis C D, Rifai B, Seymour L W and Coussios C 2012 Ultrasound-induced cavitation enhances the delivery and therapeutic efficacy of an oncolytic virus in an in vitro model J. Control. Release 157 235-42
8. Bekeredjian R, Grayburn P A and Shohet R V 2005 Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine J. Am. College Cardiol. 45 329-35 (Pubitemid 40186780)
9. Bevan P D, Karshafian R and Burns P N 2008 The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34 1152-62 (Pubitemid 351893157)
10. Biagi E, Breschi L, Vannacci E and Masotti L 2007 Stable and transient subharmonic emissions from isolated contrast agent microbubbles IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 54 480-97 (Pubitemid 46495667)
11. Bloch S H, Wan M, Dayton P A and Ferrara K W 2004 Optical observation of lipid-and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 631-3
12. Bouakaz A, Versluis M and De Jong N 2005 High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31391-9
13. Britton G L, Kim H, Kee P H, Aronowski J, Holland C K, McPherson D D and Huang S 2010 In vivo therapeutic gas delivery for neuroprotection with echogenic liposomes Circulation 122 1578-87
14. Buchanan K D, Huang S, Kim H, MacDonald R C and McPherson D D 2008 Echogenic liposome compositions for increased retention of ultrasound reflectivity at physiologic temperature J. Pharm. Sci. 97 2242-9
15. Buchanan K D, Huang S, Kim H, McPherson DD and MacDonald RC 2010 Encapsulation of NF-κB decoy oligonucleotides within echogenic liposomes and ultrasound-triggered release J. Control. Release 141 193-8
16. ® Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 725-37 (Pubitemid 36566550)
17. Chen W S, Matula T J, Brayman A A and Crum L A 2003b A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113 643-51 (Pubitemid 36105713)
18. Chen W S, Matula T J and Crum L A 2000 Ultrasound contrast agent behavior near the fragmentation threshold Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. pp 1935-8 (Pubitemid 34079732)
19. Chomas J E, Dayton P, Allen J, Morgan K and Ferrara K W 2001 Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 48 232-48 (Pubitemid 32191199)
20. Church C C 1989 A theoretical study of cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86 215-27
21. Church C C 1995 The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 1510
22. CIBA-Geigy A and Lentner C 1984 Geigy Scientific Tables: Physical Chemistry, Composition of Blood, Hematology, Somatometric Data ed C Lentner (Basle, Switzerland: CIBA-Geigy) pp 65-6
23. Coussios C C, Farny C H, ter Haar G and Roy R A 2007 Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) Int. J. Hypertherm. 23 105-20 (Pubitemid 46404249)
24. Coussios C C and Roy R A 2008 Applications of acoustics and cavitation to noninvasive therapy and drug delivery Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40 395-420 (Pubitemid 351234706)
25. Cramer E and Lauterborn W 1982 Acoustic cavitation noise spectra Appl. Sci. Res. 38 209-14
26. ® as a cavitation nucleation agent Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34 1421-33
27. Dave J K et al 2013 On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation Ultrasonics 53 880-8
28. De Jong N, Bouakaz A and Ten Cate F J 2002 Contrast harmonic imaging Ultrasonics 40 567-73 (Pubitemid 34545369)
29. Eisenbrey J R et al 2011 Simultaneous grayscale and subharmonic ultrasound imaging on a modified commercial scanner Ultrasonics 51 890-7
30. Eller A and Flynn H 1969 Generation of subharmonics of order one-half by bubbles in a sound field J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46 722
31. Fabiilli M L, Haworth K J, Fakhri N H, Kripfgans O D, Carson P L and Fowlkes J B 2009 The role of inertial cavitation in acoustic droplet vaporization IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 56 1006-17
32. TM ultrasound contrast agent at frequency range of 5-15 MHz Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37 338-42
33. Farny C H, Holt R G and Roy R A 2009 Temporal and spatial detection of HIFU-induced inertial and hot-vapor cavitation with a diagnostic ultrasound system Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35 603-15
34. FDA 2011 Joint Meeting of the Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee p 79
35. Flynn H 1964 Physics of acoustic cavitation in liquids Physical Acoustics: vol 1-B ed W P Mason (New York: Academic) pp 58-172
36. Fowlkes J B and Crum L A 1988 Cavitation threshold measurements for microsecond length pulses of ultrasound J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83 2190-201
37. Fyrillas M M and Szeri A J 1996 Surfactant dynamics and rectified diffusion of microbubbles J. Fluid Mech. 311361-78
38. Gilmore F R 1952 The Growth or Collapse of a Spherical Bubble in a Viscous Compressible Liquid (Pasadena, CA: Office of Naval Research)
39. Hamilton A J, Huang S L, Warnick D, Rabbat M, Kane B, Nagaraj A, Klegerman M and McPherson D D 2004 Intravascular ultrasound molecular imaging of atheroma components in vivo J. Am. College Cardiol. 43 453-60 (Pubitemid 38167708)
40. Haworth K J, Mast T D, Radhakrishnan K, Burgess M T, Kopechek J A, Huang S L, McPherson D D and Holland C K 2012 Passive imaging with pulsed ultrasound insonations J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132 544-53
41. Herbst S M et al 2010 Delivery of stem cells to porcine arterial wall with echogenic liposomes conjugated to antibodies against CD34 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 Mol. Pharm. 73-11
42. Hitchcock K E, Ivancevich N M, Haworth K J, Caudell Stamper D N, Vela D C, Sutton J T, Pyne-Geithman G J and Holland C K 2011 Ultrasound-enhanced rt-PA thrombolysis in an ex vivo porcine carotid artery model Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37 1240-51
43. Hitchcock K E et al 2010 Ultrasound-enhanced delivery of targeted echogenic liposomes in a novel ex vivo mouse aorta model J. Control. Release 144 288-95
44. Holland C K and Apfel R E 1989 Improved theory for the prediction of microcavitation thresholds IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 36 204-8
45. Holubkov R et al 2002 Large brachial artery diameter is associated with angiographic coronary artery disease in women Am. Heart J. 143 802-7 (Pubitemid 34595336)
46. Huang S L 2008 Liposomes in ultrasonic drug and gene delivery Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60 1167-76
47. Huang S L, Kee P, McPherson D D and MacDonald R C 2007 Multi-functional echogenic liposomes for image-guided and ultrasound-controlled PPAR agonist delivery J. Am. College Cardiol. 49 365A
48. Huang S L, Kee P H, Kim H, Moody M R, Chrzanowski S M, MacDonald R C and McPherson D D 2009 Nitric oxide-loaded echogenic liposomes for nitric oxide delivery and inhibition of intimal hyperplasia J. Am. College Cardiol. 54 652-9
49. Kabalnov A, Klein D, Pelura T, Schutt E and Weers J 1998 Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 1. Theory Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24 739-49 (Pubitemid 28285210)
50. Kalantarinia K, Belcik J T, Patrie J T and Wei K 2009 Real-time measurement of renal blood flow in healthy subjects using contrast-enhanced ultrasound Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 297 F1129-34
51. Kamiyama N, Moriyasu F, Mine Y and Goto Y 1999 Analysis of flash echo from contrast agent for designing optimal ultrasound diagnostic systems Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25 411-20 (Pubitemid 29191185)
52. King D A and O'Brien W D Jr 2011 Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129 114
53. Kopechek J A, Haworth K J, Radhakrishnan K, Huang S L, Klegerman M E, McPherson D D and Holland C K 2013 The impact of bubbles on measurement of drug release from echogenic liposomes Ultrason. Sonochem. 20 1121-30
54. Kopechek J A, Haworth K J, Raymond J L, Douglas Mast T, Perrin S R Jr, Klegerman M E, Huang S, Porter T M, McPherson D D and Holland C K 2011 Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130 3472-81
55. Korosoglou G et al 2008 Noninvasive detection of macrophage-rich atherosclerotic plaque in hyperlipidemic rabbits using 'positive contrast' magnetic resonance imaging J. Am. College Cardiol. 52 483-91 (Pubitemid 352043838)
56. Kwan J J and Borden M A 2010 Microbubble dissolution in a multigas environment Langmuir 26 6542-8
57. Laing S T and McPherson D D 2009 Cardiovascular therapeutic uses of targeted ultrasound contrast agents Cardiovasc. Res. 83 626-35
58. Laing S T, Moody M, Smulevitz B, Kim H, Kee P, Huang S, Holland C K and McPherson D D 2011 Ultrasoundenhanced thrombolytic effect of tissue plasminogen activator-loaded echogenic liposomes in an in vivo rabbit aorta thrombus model-brief report Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 31 1357-9
59. Leighton T G 1994 The Acoustic Bubble (New York: Academic) pp 151-3
60. Lindner J R 2004 Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 3 527-33
61. Lo A H, Kripfgans O D, Carson P L, Rothman E D and Fowlkes J B 2007 Acoustic droplet vaporization threshold: effects of pulse duration and contrast agent IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 54 933-45 (Pubitemid 46908673)
62. Macdonald C, Gomatam J, Sboros V, Pye S, Moran C and McDicken W 2004 The Blake threshold in microbubble dynamics Int. Congr. on Acoustics p I-461
63. Marmottant P, Van der Meer S, Emmer M, Versluis M, De Jong N, Hilgenfeldt S and Lohse D 2005 A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 3499-505 (Pubitemid 41820855)
64. Masuo O, Terada T, Walker G, Tsuura M, Matsumoto H, Tohya K, Kimura M, Nakai K and Itakura T 2002 Study of the patency of small arterial branches after stent placement with an experimental in vivo model Am. J. Neuroradiol. 23 706-10 (Pubitemid 34411937)
65. Mehier-Humbert S, Yan F, Frinking P, Schneider M, Guy R H and Bettinger T 2007 Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: influence of contrast agent on transfection Bioconjug. Chem. 18 652-62 (Pubitemid 47010783)
66. Miller D L, Averkiou M A, Brayman A A, Everbach E C, Holland C K, Wible J H Jr and Wu J 2008 Bioeffects considerations for diagnostic ultrasound contrast agents J. Ultrasound Med. 27 611-32 (Pubitemid 351489681)
67. Miller D L and Dou C 2004 Membrane damage thresholds for pulsed or continuous ultrasound in phagocytic cells loaded with contrast agent gas bodies Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30 405-11 (Pubitemid 38456708)
68. Neppiras E 1980 Acoustic cavitation thresholds and cyclic processes Ultrasonics 18 201-9 (Pubitemid 11453982)
69. Pelberg R A, Wei K, Kamiyama N, Sklenar J, Bin J and Kaul S 1999 Potential advantage of flash echocardiography for digital subtraction of B-mode images acquired during myocardial contrast echocardiography J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 12 85-93 (Pubitemid 29091772)
70. Porter T M, Smith D A B and Holland C K 2006 Acoustic techniques for assessing the Optison destruction threshold J. Ultrasound Med. 25 1519-29
71. Postema M, Marmottant P, Lancée C T, Hilgenfeldt S and Jong N D 2004 Ultrasound-induced microbubble coalescence Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30 1337-44 (Pubitemid 39576185)
72. Prosperetti A and Lezzi A 1986 Bubble dynamics in a compressible liquid: part 1. First-order theory J. Fluid Mech. 168 457-78 (Pubitemid 16633300)
73. Qin S, Caskey C F and Ferrara K W 2009 Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering Phys. Med. Biol. 54 R27-57
74. Radhakrishnan K, Haworth K J, Huang S, Klegerman M E, McPherson D D and Holland C K 2012 Stability of echogenic liposomes as a blood pool ultrasound contrast agent in a physiologic flow phantom Ultrasound Med. Biol. 38 1970-81
75. Roy R A, Madanshetty S I and Apfel R E 1990 An acoustic backscattering technique for the detection of transient cavitation produced by microsecond pulses of ultrasound J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 2451
76. Samuel S, Cooper M A, Bull J L, Fowlkes J B and Miller D L 2009 An ex vivo study of the correlation between acoustic emission and microvascular damage Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35 1574-86
77. Santin M D, King D A, Foiret J, Haak A, O'Brien W D Jr and Bridal S L 2010 Encapsulated contrast microbubble radial oscillation associated with postexcitation pressure peaks J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127 1156-64
78. Sarkar K, Katiyar A and Jain P 2009 Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: effects of encapsulation permeability Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35 1385-96
79. Sboros V 2008 Response of contrast agents to ultrasound Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60 1117-36
80. Skyba D M, Price R J, Linka A Z, Skalak T C and Kaul S 1998 Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue Circulation 98 290
81. Smith D A B, Porter T M, Martinez J, Huang S, MacDonald R C, McPherson D D and Holland C K 2007 Destruction thresholds of echogenic liposomes with clinical diagnostic ultrasound Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33 797-809 (Pubitemid 46654545)
82. Song S, Shen Z, Chen L, Brayman A A and Miao C H 2011 Explorations of high-intensity therapeutic ultrasound and microbubble-mediated gene delivery in mouse liver Gene Ther. 18 1006-14
83. Sridharan A, Eisenbrey J R, MacHado P, Demuinck E D, Doyley M M and Forsberg F 2013 Delineation of atherosclerotic plaque using subharmonic imagingfiltering techniques and acommercial intravascular ultrasound system Ultrason. Imaging 35 30-44
84. Stride E and Coussios C 2010 Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 224 171-91
85. Stride E and Saffari N 2003 Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a review Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 217 429-47
86. Sutton J T, Haworth K J, Pyne-Geithman G and Holland C K 2013 Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery for cardiovascular disease Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 10 573-92
87. Tiemann K, Pohl C, Schlosser T, Goenechea J, Bruce M, Veltmann C, Kuntz S, Bangard M and Becher H 2000 Stimulated acoustic emission: pseudo-Doppler shifts seen during the destruction of nonmoving microbubbles Ultrasound Med. Biol. 26 1161-7
88. Tiukinhoy-Laing S D, Buchanan K, Parikh D, Huang S, Macdonald R C, Mcpherson D D and Klegerman M E 2007 Fibrin targeting of tissue plasminogen activator-loaded echogenic liposomes J. Drug Target. 15 109-14 (Pubitemid 46957696)
89. Tortoli P, Boni E, Corsi M, Arditi M and Frinking P 2005 Different effects of microbubble destruction and translation in Doppler measurements IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 52 1183-8 (Pubitemid 41311519)
90. Tung Y S, Choi J J, Baseri B and Konofagou E E 2010 Identifying the inertial cavitation threshold and skull effects in a vessel phantom using focused ultrasound and microbubbles Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36 840-52
91. Uhlendorf V and Hoffmann C 1994 Nonlinear acoustical response of coated microbubbles in diagnostic ultrasound Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. pp 1559-62
92. Uhlendorf V, Scholle F D and Reinhardt M 2000 Acoustic behaviour of current ultrasound contrast agents Ultrasonics 38 81-86 (Pubitemid 30592604)
93. Vykhodtseva N I, Hynynen K and Damianou C 1995 Histologic effects of high intensity pulsed ultrasound exposure with subharmonic emission in rabbit brain in vivo Ultrasound Med. Biol. 21 969-79
94. Wei K, Jayaweera A R, Firoozan S, Linka A, Skyba D M and Kaul S 1998 Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion Circulation 97 473-83 (Pubitemid 28090220)
95. Weidinger F, Frick M, Alber H F, Ulmer H, Schwarzacher S P and Pachinger O 2002 Association of wall thickness of the brachial artery measured with high-resolution ultrasound with risk factors and coronary artery disease Am. J. Cardiol. 89 1025-9 (Pubitemid 34462844)
96. Yeh C K and Su S Y 2008 Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34 1281-91