Youth and video games-Exploring effects on learning and engagement

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

Volumn 221, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 98-106

  Evans, Michael A ^a   Norton, Anderson ^a   Chang, Mido ^b   Deater Deckard, Kirby ^a   Balci, Osman ^c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Engagement; Instructional design; Learning; Video games; youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883525425     PISSN: 21908370     EISSN: 21512604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000135     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Atkinson, T., & Hirumi, A. (2010). The game brain. In A. Hirumi (Ed.), Playing games in school (pp. 57-73). Washington, DC: International Society for Technology Education (ISTE).
2. Bastable, V., & Schifter, D. (2008). Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 165-184). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
3. Blair, C. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of child functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57, 111-127.
4. Bødker, K., Kensing, F., & Simonsen, J. (2004). Participatory IT design: Designing for business and workplace realities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bowman, R. F. (1982). A Pac-Man theory of motivation. Tactical implications for classroom instruction. Educational Technology, 22, 14-17.
6. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. W. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic & algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory and practice in cultural context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Chang, K., Wu, L., Weng, S., & Sung, Y. (2012). Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning. Computers & Education, 58, 775-786.
9. Clements, D. H. (1999). Concrete manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1, 45-60.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
11. Deater-Deckard, K., Chang, M., & Evans, M. (2013). Engagement states and learning from educational games. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 139, 21-30.
12. Deater-Deckard, K., & Wang, Z. (2012). Development of temperament and attention: Behavioral genetic approaches. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (2nd edn., pp. 331-342). New York, NY: Guilford.
13. Dodge, T., Barab, S., Stuckey, B., Warren, S., Heiselt, C., & Stein, R. (2008). Children's sense of self: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19, 225-249.
14. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944.
15. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House/Ballantine.
16. Evans, M. A., Abel, T. D., & Musselman, R. (2010). Designing a data visualization app for Fang, X., & Zhao, F. (2010). Personality and enjoyment of computer game play. Computers in Industry, 61, 342-349.
17. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillian.
18. Gee, J. P. (2008). Learning and games. In K. Salen (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning (pp. 21-40). New York, NY: MIT Press.
19. Gee, J. (2010a). New digital media and learning as an emerging area and "worked examples'' as one way forward: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Gee, J. (2010b). Video games: What they can teach us about audience engagement. Nieman Reports, 64, 52-54. Retrieved from Communication & Mass Media Complete database.
21. Gillispie, L., Martin, F., & Parker, M. A. (2010). Effects of a 3-D video game on middle school student achievement and attitude in mathematics. Electronic Journal of Mathematics & Technology, 4, 68-80.
22. Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2012). How does students' fractional knowledge influence equation writing? Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. Hirumi, A., Appelman, B., Rieber, L., & van Eck, R. (2010). Preparing instructional designers for game-based learning: Part 1. Tech Trends, 54, 27-37.
24. Hoffman, B., & Nadelson, L. (2010). Motivational engagement and video gaming: a mixed methods study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58, 245-270. doi: 10.1007/s11423-009-9134-9
25. Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. L. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
26. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., . . . Tripp, L. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Jones, M. G. (1998, February). Creating electronic learning environments: Games, flow and the user interface. Presentation at the national convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), St. Louis, MO, USA.
28. Kaput, J. J. (1998). Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by "algebrafying'' the K-12 curriculum. In G. Burrill & J. Ferrini-Mundy (Eds.), The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum (pp. 25-26). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5-17). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
30. Ke, F. (2008a). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay?. Computers & Education, 51, 1609-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.003
31. Ke, F. (2008b). Alternative goal structures for computer gamebased learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 429-445.
32. Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Gameplaying for math's learning: Cooperative or not?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 249-259.
33. Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 13-24.
34. Kiili, K., & Ketamo, H. (2007). Exploring the learning mechanism in educational games. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 15, 319-324.
35. Kim, S., & Chang, M. (2010). Computer games for the math achievement of diverse students. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 224-232.
36. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). An approach to participatory instructional design in secondary education: an exploratory study. Educational Research, 52, 45-59.
37. Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relation and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 59-77. doi: 10.1348/000709910X503501
38. Mathematical Sciences Education Board (MSEB). (2004). On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
39. Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. Jr. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
40. Norton, A., Wilkins, J. L. M., & Boyce, S. (2012). Supporting students' constructions of fractions schemes: Is there an app for that, too? In L. R. Van Zoest, J.-J. Lo, & J. L. Kratke (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology for Mathematics Education. Kalamazoo, MI: University of Western Michigan.
41. Oblinger, D. (2006). Games and learning: Digital games have the potential to bring play back into the educational experience. Educause Quarterly, 3, 5-7.
42. Olive, J. (2000). Computer tools for interactive mathematical activity in the elementary school. International Journal for Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5, 241-262.
43. Olive, J., & Vomvoridi, E. (2006). Making sense of instruction on fractions when a student lacks necessary fractional schemes: The case of Tim. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 18-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.11.003
44. Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Educating the human brain. Washington, DC: APA.
45. Pressman, R. S. (2010). Software engineering: A practitioner's approach (7th edn.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
46. Ritzhaupt, A., Higgins, H., & Allred, B. (2011). Effects of modem educational game play on attitudes towards mathematics, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22, 277-297.
47. Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marlanov, V., Correa, M., Flores, P., . . . Salinas, M. (2002). Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40, 71-94.
48. Salen, K. (2007). The ecology of games; connecting youth, games, and learning. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
49. Samur, Y., & Evans, M. A. (2012, April). The effects of serious games on performance and engagement: A review of the literature (2001-2011) Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
50. Sandford, R., & Williamson, B. (2005). Games and learning. NESTA Futurelab. Retrieved from http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/handbooks/Handbook133
51. Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: A book lenses. New York, NY: Morgan Kaufmann.
52. Sherry, J. L. (2013). Formative research for STEM educational games: Lessons from the Children's Television Workshop. Zeitschrift fër Psychologie, 221 doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000134
53. Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 91-104.
54. Sims, K. V., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Domain specificity of spatial expertise: the case of video game players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 97-115. doi: 10.1002/acp.759
55. Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35, 19-29.
56. Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2010). Children's fractional knowledge. New York, NY: Springer.
57. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. (2009). Informal scientific reasoning in online virtual worlds. In Journal of Science Education & Technology. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8
59. Suh, J., Moyer, P., & Heo, H. (2005). Examining technology uses in the classroom: Developing fraction sense using virtual manipulative concept tutorials. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3, 1-21.
60. Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It's not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE Review, 41, 16-30.
61. Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 229-243.
62. Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., . . . Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82, 61-89. doi: 10.3102/0034654312436980