Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions

BMC Ophthalmology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Schweier, Caterina ^a   Hanson, James V M ^a   Funk, Jens ^a   Töteberg Harms, Marc ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84883461922     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-44     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Applanation tonometry. Goldmann H, Schmidt T, Ophthalmologica 1957 134 4 221 242 10.1159/000303213 13484216
2. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Punjabi OS, Ho HK, Kniestedt C, Bostrom AG, Stamper RL, Lin SC, Curr Eye Res 2006 31 10 851 862 10.1080/02713680600899887 17050277 (Pubitemid 44581308)
3. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004 45 9 3118 3121 10.1167/iovs.04-0018 15326129 (Pubitemid 39121844)
4. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN, Ophthalmology 2007 114 4 658 665 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.065 17141320 (Pubitemid 46483675)
5. Central corneal thickness and applanation tonometry. Huang Y, Tham CC, Zhang M, J Cataract Refract Surg 2008 34 3 347 18299052 (Pubitemid 351625592)
6. Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with regular corneal astigmatism. Holladay JT, Allison ME, Prager TC, Am J Ophthalmol 1983 96 1 90 93 6869483 (Pubitemid 13073326)
7. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ, Am J Ophthalmol 2007 143 1 39 47 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.036 17188041 (Pubitemid 44917829)
8. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, Quigley HA, J Glaucoma 2007 16 7 581 588 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180640f40 18091174 (Pubitemid 350307608)
9. New Tonopen XL: comparison with the Goldmann tonometer. Iester M, Mermoud A, Achache F, Roy S, Eye (Lond) 2001 15 Pt 1 52 58 (Pubitemid 32258217)
10. Comparative evaluation of TonoPen AVIA, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry. Bhartiya S, Bali SJ, Sharma R, Chaturvedi N, Dada T, Int Ophthalmol 2011 31 4 297 302 10.1007/s10792-011-9458-4 21761249
11. Fast, automatic, electronic tonometers based on an exact theroy. Mackay RS, Marg E, Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1959 37 495 507
12. Automatic tonometer with exact theory: various biological applications. Mackay RS, Marg E, Oechsli R, Science 1960 131 1668 1669 10.1126/science.131. 3414.1668 14419488
13. Dynamic tonometry. Dekking HM, Coster HD, Ophthalmologica 1967 154 1 59 74 10.1159/000305149 6059593
14. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Kontiola A, Doc Ophthalmol 1996 93 3 265 276 9550354 (Pubitemid 28126130)
15. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Kontiola AI, Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000 78 2 142 145 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000. 078002142.x 10794245 (Pubitemid 30201419)
16. Measuring intraocular pressure with the pulsair 3000 and rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Kontiola A, Puska P, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004 242 1 3 7 10.1007/s00417-003-0671-3 14634828 (Pubitemid 38208277)
17. Estimation using xtmixed. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using STATA College Station, TX: STATA Press, Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, 2 2008 433 436
18. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Bland JM, Altman DG, Stat Methods Med Res 1999 8 2 135 160 10.1191/096228099673819272 10501650 (Pubitemid 29425900)
19. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Bland JM, Altman DG, Lancet 1986 1 8476 307 310 2868172 (Pubitemid 16134762)
20. Intraocular pressure, ocular pulse pressure, and body position. Buchanan RA, Williams TD, Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985 62 1 59 62 10.1097/00006324- 198501000-00008 3976837 (Pubitemid 15125196)
21. IOP variations in the sitting and supine positions. Jorge J, Ramoa-Marques R, Lourenco A, Silva S, Nascimento S, Queiros A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, J Glaucoma 2010 19 9 609 612 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181ca7ca5 20164792
22. Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients. Prata TS, De-Moraes CG, Kanadani FN, Ritch R, Paranhos A Jr, Surv Ophthalmol 2010 55 5 445 453 10.1016/j.survophthal.2009. 12.002 20637484
23. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R, Ophthalmology 2008 115 1 80 84 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.061 17573114 (Pubitemid 350309417)
24. Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, Amstutz C, Frueh B, Br J Ophthalmol 2006 90 7 833 835 10.1136/bjo.2005.089870 16672330 (Pubitemid 43973990)
25. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005 46 12 4578 4580 10.1167/iovs.05-0586 16303951 (Pubitemid 44264556)
26. Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties. Ismail AR, Lamont M, Perera S, Khan-Lim D, Mehta R, Macleod JD, Anderson DF, Br J Ophthalmol 2007 91 7 980 981 10.1136/bjo.2006. 099564 17576716 (Pubitemid 47013120)
27. Dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Moreno-Montanes J, Olmo N, Zarranz-Ventura J, Heras-Mulero H, Cornea 2009 28 7 836 837 19574896
28. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas. Rootman DS, Insler MS, Thompson HW, Parelman J, Poland D, Unterman SR, Arch Ophthalmol 1988 106 12 1697 1700 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140869030 3058102 (Pubitemid 19000132)
29. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G, Am J Ophthalmol 2008 145 2 215 221 10.1016/j.ajo.2007. 10.003 18222191
30. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Bostrom A, Nee M, Stamper RL, Arch Ophthalmol 2005 123 11 1532 1537 10.1001/archopht.123.11.1532 16286615 (Pubitemid 41626689)
31. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005 243 4 359 366 10.1007/s00417-004-1024-6 15864625 (Pubitemid 40823242)
32. Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Frenkel RE, Hong YJ, Shin DH, Arch Ophthalmol 1988 106 6 750 753 10.1001/archopht.1988. 01060130820030 3369998
33. Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Kao SF, Lichter PR, Bergstrom TJ, Rowe S, Musch DC, Ophthalmology 1987 94 12 1541 1544 3431824 (Pubitemid 18006879)
34. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D, Br J Ophthalmol 2005 89 7 847 850 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614 15965164 (Pubitemid 40904807)