Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties [4]

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 980-981

  Ismail, A R ^a   Lamont, M ^a   Perera, S ^a   Khan Lim, D ^a   Mehta, R ^a   Macleod, J D A ^a   Anderson, D F ^a  

^a SOUTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; LETTER; MANOMETRY; MEASUREMENT; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 34347358614     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.099564     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. Dynamic contour tonometry. A comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmology 2004;122:1287-1293.
2. Kauffmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. IOVS 2004;45:3118- 3121.
3. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, et al. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1572-1575.
4. Kauffmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. IOVS 2003;44:3790-3794.
5. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:85-87.
6. Browning AC, Bhan A, Rotchford AP, et al. The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1395-1399.
7. Mark H. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1973;76:223-224.
8. Geyer O, Mayron Y, Loewenstein A, et al. Tono-pen tonemtry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:538-540.
9. Pandav SS, Sharma A, Gupta A, et al. Reliability of ProTon and Goldmann applanation tonometers in normal and postkeraoplasty eyes. Ophthalmology 2002;109:979-984.
10. Rao VJ, Gnanaraj L, Mitchell KW, et al. Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes. Cornea, 2001 Nov, 20:834-8.