Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in African American Subjects

Ophthalmology

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 658-665

  Medeiros, Felipe A ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEA; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALIFORNIA; CORNEA; EYE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33947600358     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.065     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Whitacre M.M., and Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38 (1993) 1-30
2. Whitacre M.M., Stein R.A., and Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 115 (1993) 592-596
3. Liu J., and Roberts C.J. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 146-155
4. Kanngiesser H.E., Kniestedt C., and Robert Y.C. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 344-350
5. Kniestedt C., Nee M., and Stamper R.L. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 122 (2004) 1287-1293
6. Kniestedt C., Nee M., and Stamper R.L. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243 (2005) 359-366
7. Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., and Thiel M.A. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 3118-3121
8. Kamppeter B.A., and Jonas J.B. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 318-320
9. Pache M., Wilmsmeyer S., Lautebach S., and Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243 (2005) 763-767
10. Ku J.Y., Danesh-Meyer H.V., Craig J.P., et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye 20 (2006) 191-198
11. Doyle A., and Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 288-292
12. Sommer A., Tielsch J.M., Katz J., et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med 325 (1991) 1412-1417
13. Tielsch J.M., Sommer A., Katz J., et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 266 (1991) 369-374
14. Racette L., Wilson M.R., Zangwill L.M., et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma in blacks: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 48 (2003) 295-313
15. La Rosa F.A., Gross R.L., and Orengo-Nania S. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. Arch Ophthalmol 119 (2001) 23-27
16. Shimmyo M., Ross A.J., Moy A., and Mostafavi R. Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans. Am J Ophthalmol 136 (2003) 603-613
17. Brandt J.D., Beiser J.A., Kass M.A., et al. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 1779-1788
18. Medeiros F.A., Sample P.A., Zangwill L.M., et al. Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol 136 (2003) 805-813
19. Medeiros F.A., Sample P.A., and Weinreb R.N. Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol 135 (2003) 131-137
20. Harrell Jr. F.E. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis (2001), Springer, New York 56-61
21. Liang K.Y., and Zeger S.L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73 (1986) 13-22
22. Glynn R.J., and Rosner B. Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 110 (1992) 381-387
23. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8 (1999) 135-160
24. Ehlers N., Bramsen T., and Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53 (1975) 34-43
25. Mendelsohn A.D., Forster R.K., Mendelsohn S.L., et al. Comparative tonometric measurements of eye bank eyes. Cornea 6 (1987) 219-225
26. Doughty M.J., and Zaman M.L. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44 (2000) 367-408
27. Wolfs R.C., Klaver C.C., Vingerling J.R., et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol 123 (1997) 767-772
28. Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., and Thiel M.A. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 3790-3794
29. Medeiros F.A., Weinreb R.N., Sample P.A., et al. Validation of a predictive model to estimate the risk of conversion from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 123 (2005) 1351-1360
30. Gordon M.O., Beiser J.A., Brandt J.D., et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120 (2002) 714-720 discussion 829-30
31. Sommer A., Tielsch J.M., Katz J., et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 109 (1991) 1090-1095