Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 90, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 833-835

  Iliev, Milko E ^a   Goldblum, D ^a   Katsoulis, K ^a   Amstutz, C ^a   Frueh, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROPROCESSOR; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PACHOMETRY; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLECTOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SAFETY; SLIT LAMP; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TONOMETER;

ADULT; AGED; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 33745667304     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.089870     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Goldmann H, Schmidt TH. Über Applanations-tonometrie. Ophthalmologica 1957;134:221-42.
2. Kontiola AI. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 1997;93:265-76.
3. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:142-5.
4. Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, et al. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res 2001;73:781-5.
5. Goldblum D, Kontiola AI, Mittag T, et al. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:942-6.
6. Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, et al. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1138-41.
7. Knollinger AM, La Croix NC, Barrett PM, et al. An evaluation of the TonoVet rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4845.
8. Filippopoulos T, Matsubara A, Danias J, et al. Accuracy and sensitivity of two non-invasive tonometers for the measurement of intraocular pressure in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1257.
9. Kontiola AI, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:3-7.
10. Böhnke M, Wälti R, Lindgren F, et al. Measuring corneal thickness in photokeratectomy with a reflectometry incorporated into the laser beam of the excimer laser. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1998;212:367-71.
11. Ventura ACS, Böhnke M, Mojon DS. Central corneal thickness measurements in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:792-5.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
13. Martinez-de-la-Casa J, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, et al. Comparison of dynamic contour, rebound and standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4852.
14. Hansen MK. Clinical comparison of the XPERT non-contact tonometer and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995;73:176-80.
15. Brencher HL, Kohl P, Reinke AR, et al. Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers. J Am Optom Assoc 1991;62:395-402.
16. Iester M, Mermoud A, Achache F, et al. New Tonopen XL: comparison with the Goldmann tonometer. Eye 2001;15:52-8.
17. Garcia Resua C, Giraldez Fernandez MJ, Cervino Exposito A, et al. Clinical evaluation of the new TGDc-01 "PRA" palpebral tonometer: comparison with contact and non-contact tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:143-50.