A mathematics teacher's practice in a technological environment: A case study analysis using two complementary theories

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Volumn 16 3, Issue , 2011, Pages 247-265

  Tabach, Michal ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Instrumental orchestration; Mathematics teacher; Technological pedagogical content knowledge

Indexed keywords

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS; COMPLEMENTARY THEORIES; INSTRUMENTAL ORCHESTRATION; INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICS TEACHER; TEACHERS' KNOWLEDGE; TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE;

MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; TECHNOLOGY;

TEACHING;

EID: 84883447048     PISSN: 22111662     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10758-011-9186-x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245-274.
2. Artigue, M., Cerulli, M., Haspekian, M., & Maracci, M. (2009). Connecting and integrating theoretical frames: The TELMA contribution. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(3), 217-240.
3. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
4. Ben-Zvi, D. (1999). Constructing an understanding of data graphs. In O. Zaslavaky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, (Vol. 2, pp. 97-104). Haifa, Israel: Technion.
5. Ben-Zvi, D., & Arcavi, A. (2001). Junior high school students' construction of global views of data and data representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45(1-3), 35-65. (Pubitemid 33808230)
6. Brown, M. C., I. I., & Cato, B. (2008). Preface. In AACTE Committee on Innovation, Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. vii-x). NY, USA: Routledge.
7. Bruce, B. C., & Hogan, M. C. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transforming in a post-typographic word (pp. 269-281). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Drijvers, P. (2011). Teachers transforming resources into orchestrations. Paper presented at the CERME 7-Seventh conference of European research in mathematics education.
9. Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213-234.
10. Ely, D. P. (1996). Trends in educational technology 1995. Eric Digest [Online]. Available: http://ericir.syr.edu/ithome/digests/trendsdig.html.
11. German, T., & Barrett, C. (2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science, 16(1), 1-5. (Pubitemid 40176519)
12. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Graeber, A., & Tirosh, D. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge: A useful or an elusive notion? In P. Sullivan (Ed.), Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (pp. 117-132). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
14. Guin, D., Ruthven, K., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2005). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. New York: Springer.
15. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Kent, P. (2004). On the integration of digital technologies into mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 309-326. (Pubitemid 40168710)
16. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation, Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-30). NY, USA: Routledge.
17. Laborde, C. (2003). Technology used as a tool for mediating knowledge in the teaching of mathematics: The case of Cabri-geometry. In W.-C. Yang, S. C. Chu, T. de Alwis, & M. G. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Asian technology conference in mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 23-38) Hsinchu Taiwan ROC: Chung Hua University.
18. Lagrange, J. B., Artigue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2003). Technology and mathematics education: Multidimensional overview of recent research and innovation. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 237-270). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Lagrange, J. B., & Monaghan, J. (2009). On the adoption of a model to interpret teachers' use of technology in mathematics lessens. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1605-1614). Lyon: INRP. Retrieved on 4 April 2011, from http://www.inrp.fr/editions/editions-electroniques/cerme6/working-group-9.
20. Mariotti, M. A. (2002). Influence of technologies advances in students' math learning. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 757-786). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
21. Mioduser, D. (1998). Framework for the study of the cognitive nature and architecture of technological problem solving. Journal of Technology Education and Design, 8(2), 167-184. (Pubitemid 128514339)
22. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teacher College Records, 108(6), 1017-1054. (Pubitemid 43824310)
23. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
24. Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers' intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299-317.
25. Prediger, S., Arzarello, F., Bosch, M., & Lenfant, A. (Eds.) (2008). Comparing, combining, coordinating-networking strategies for connecting theoretical approaches. Thematic Issue of ZDM, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 163-327.
26. Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008b). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 165-178.
27. Robert, A., & Rogalski, J. (2005). A cross-analysis of the mathematics teacher's activity. An example in a French 10th-grade class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1-3), 269-298.
28. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
29. Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., Arcavi, A., & Dreyfus, T. (2008). Computerized environments in mathematics classrooms: A research-design view. In L. D. English, M. B. Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. A. Lesh, B. Sriraman, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook for international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 784-805). NY, USA: Routledge.
30. Trouche, L. (2004). Managing complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students' command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281-307. (Pubitemid 40168709)
31. Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2002). Handheld technology for mathematics education: Flashback into the future. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(7), 667-681.
32. Ve'rillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifact: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 9(3), 1-33.
33. Yerushalmy, M. (2005). Challenging known transitions: Learning and teaching algebra with technology. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(3), 37-42.