Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 165-178

  Prediger, Susanne ^a   Bikner Ahsbahs, Angelika ^b   Arzarello, Ferdinando ^c  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867375767     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-008-0086-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Artigue, M., Bartolini-Bussi, M., Dreyfus, T., Gray, E., & Prediger, S. (2006). 'Different theoretical perspectives and approaches in research in mathematics education'. In M. Bosch. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the European society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1239-1244). Barcelona: Fundemi IQS.
2. Arzarello F. & Bartolini Bussi M. G., (1998). Italian Trends in Research in Mathematics Education: A National Case Study in the International Perspective. In J. Kilpatrick J. & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Mathematics Education as a Research Domain: A Search for Identity (pp. 243-262) Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Arzarello, F., Bosch, M. Lenfant, A., & Prediger, S. (2007). Different theoretical perspectives in research from teaching problems to research problems. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Phillipou (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 5) (pp. 1618-1627), Cyprus 2007, ERME.
4. Arzarello, F., Bosch, M., Gascón, J. & Sabena C. (2008). The ostensive dimension through the lenses of two didactic approaches. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
5. Bergsten, C. (2008). How do theories influence the research on teaching and learning limits of functions. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
6. Bigalke, H. G. (1984). Thesen zur Theoriediskussion in der Mathematikdidaktik. [Contributions to the discussion about theories in mathematics education.] Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 5, 133-165.
7. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2007). "Sensitizing concepts" as heuristics to compare and connect different theories. Contribution to the symposium: networking a variety of theories within a scientific domain-the case of mathematics education. In Ben öCsapó & Csaba Csikos (Eds.), Developing Potentials for Learning, 12th Biennial Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction. Budapest, Hungary: University of Szeged.
8. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (2006). 'Diversity of theories in mathematics education-How can we deal with it?' ZDM 38(1), 52-57.
9. Brousseau, G. (1997). The theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Cerulli, M., Trgalova, J., Maracci, M., Psycharis, G., & Geirget, J. P. (2008): Comparing theoretical frameworks enacted in experimental research: TELMA experience. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
11. Chevallard, Y. (1992). Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique: perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 12(1), 73-112.
12. Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work. Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives, In F. K. Lester (Eds.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 3-38). Reston: NCTM.
13. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
14. Dreyfus, T. (2006). Linking theories in mathematics education. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Retirement as Process and as Concept (pp. 77-82). Festschrift for Eddie Gray and David Tall, presented at Charles University, Prague, 15-16 July, 2006.
15. Eisenhart, M. (1991). Conceptual frameworks for research. Ideas from a cultural anthropologist; implications for mathematics education researchers. In R. Underhill (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America. Blaksburg, VA: Psychology of Mathematics Education.
16. Gellert, U. (2008). Validity and relevance: comparing and combining two sociological perspectives on mathematics classroom practice. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
17. Habermas, J. (1999). Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
18. Halverscheid, S. (2008). Building a local conceptual framework for epistemic actions in a modelling environment with experiments. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
19. Kaldrimidou, M, Sakonidis, H., & Tzekaki, M. (2008). Comparative readings of the nature of the mathematical knowledge under construction in the classroom. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
20. Kidron, Y., Lenfant, A., Artigue, M., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Dreyfus, T. (2008). Toward networking three theoretical approaches: the case of social interaction. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
21. Kuhn, T. S. (1969). Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolution [The structure of the scientific revolution] Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
22. Lamnek, S. (2005). Qualitative Sozialforschung [Qualitative social research]. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Verlag.
23. Lerman, S. (2006). Theories of mathematics education: is plurality a problem?. ZDM 38(1), 8-13.
24. Lester, F. K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. ZDM 37(6), 457-467.
25. Maier, H., & Beck, C. (2001). Zur Theoriebildung in der interpretativen mathematikdidaktischen Forschung. [Towards building theories in the interpretative research of mathematics education]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 22(1), 29-50.
26. Maracci, M. (2008). Combining different theoretical perspectives for analyzing students' difficulties in vector spaces theory. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
27. Mason, J., & Waywood, A. (1996). The role of theory in mathematics education and research. In A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1055-1089). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
28. Niss, M. (2007). Reflections on the State of and trends in research in mathematics teaching, learning. From here to utopia. In F.K. Lester, Frank K. (Eds.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1293-1312). Reston: NCTM.
29. Prediger, S. (2008). How are theoretical approaches expressed in research practices? A report on an experience in comparing theoretical approaches with respect to the construction of research problems. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
30. Rodriguez, E., Bosch, M. & Gascón, J. (2008). A networking method to compare theories: Metacognition in problem solving reformulated within the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
31. Silver, E. A., & Herbst, Patricio G. (2007). Theory in Mathematics Education Scholarship. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 39-68). Reston: NCTM.
32. Sriraman, B. & English, L. D. (2005/2006). Theories of mathematics education: A global survey of theoretical frameworks/trends in mathematics education research. ZDM 37(6) and 38(1).
33. Steinbring, H. (2005). The Construction of New Mathematical Knowledge in Classroom Interaction-An Epistemological Perspective. Mathematics Education Library, vol. 38, Berlin, New York: Springer.
34. Steinbring, H. (2008). Changed Views on Mathematical Knowledge in the Course of Didactical Theory Development. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education (this issue).
35. Wittmann, E. C. (1995). Mathematics education as a 'design science'. Educational Studies in Mathematics 29(4), 355-374.