Activation-induced cytidine deaminase does not impact murine meiotic recombination

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 645-655

  Cortesao, Catarina S ^a   Freitas, Raquel F ^a   Barreto, Vasco M ^a  

^a INSTITUTO GULBENKIAN DE CIÊNCIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

AID; Cytidine deaminase; Double strand breaks; Germline; Meiotic recombination

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION INDUCED CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN HEAVY CHAIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN KAPPA CHAIN; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE FUNCTION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; GERM LINE; HYBRID MOUSE STRAIN; MALE; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VARIABLE NUMBER OF TANDEM REPEAT; ANIMAL; B LYMPHOCYTE; C57BL MOUSE; DEFICIENCY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; METABOLISM;

ANIMALIA; MURINAE; MUS;

ANIMALS; B-LYMPHOCYTES; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; IMMUNOGLOBULIN CLASS SWITCHING; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84883215352     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.113.005553     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Arakawa, H., J. Hauschild, and J.-M. Buerstedde, 2002 Requirement of the activation-induced deaminase (AID) gene for immunoglobulin gene conversion. Science 295: 1301-1306.
2. Barreto, V. M., and B. G. Magor, 2011 Activation-induced cytidine deaminase structure and functions: a species comparative view. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 35: 991-1007.
3. Bastos, H., B. Lassalle, A. Chicheportiche, L. Riou, J. Testart et al., 2005 Flow cytometric characterization of viable meiotic and postmeiotic cells by Hoechst 33342 in mouse spermatogenesis. Cytometry A 65: 40-49.
4. Baudat, F.,K.Manova, J. P. Yuen,M. Jasin, and S. Keeney, 2000 Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol. Cell 6: 989-998.
5. Begum, N. A., and T. Honjo, 2012 Evolutionary comparison of the mechanism of DNA cleavage with respect to immune diversity and genomic instability. Biochemistry 51: 5243-5256.
6. Bhutani, N., J. J. Brady, M. Damian, A. Sacco, S. Y. Corbel et al., 2010 Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature 463: 1042-1047.
7. Broman, K. W., L. B. Rowe, G. A. Churchill, and K. Paigen, 2002 Crossover interference in the mouse. Genetics 160: 1123-1131.
8. Chaudhuri, J.,M. Tian, C. Khuong, K. Chua, E. Pinaud et al., 2003 Transcriptiontargeted DNA deamination by the AID antibody diversification enzyme. Nature 422: 726-730.
9. Chiarle, R., Y. Zhang, R. L. Frock, S. M. Lewis, B. Molinie et al., 2011 Genome-wide translocation sequencing reveals mechanisms of chromosome breaks and rearrangements in B cells. Cell 147: 107-119.
10. Faili, A., S. Aoufouchi, Q. Guéranger, C. Zober, A. Léon et al., 2002 AIDdependent somatic hypermutation occurs as a DNA single-strand event in the BL2 cell line. Nat. Immunol. 3: 815-821.
11. Gerton, J. L., and R. S. Hawley, 2005 Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 477-487.
12. Guo, J. U., Y. Su, C. Zhong, G.-L. Ming, and H. Song, 2011 Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell 145: 423-434.
13. Harris, R. S., J. E. Sale, S. K. Petersen-Mahrt, and M. S. Neuberger, 2002 AID is essential for immunoglobulin V gene conversion in a cultured B cell line. Curr. Biol. 12: 435-438.
14. Hasham, M. G., N. M. Donghia, E. Coffey, J. Maynard, K. J. Snow et al., 2010 Widespread genomic breaks generated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase are prevented by homologous recombination. Nat. Immunol. 11: 820-826.
15. Hasham, M. G., K. J. Snow, N. M. Donghia, J. A. Branca, M. D. Lessard et al., 2012 Activation-induced cytidine deaminase-initiated off-target DNA breaks are detected and resolved during S phase. J. Immunol. 189: 2374- 2382.
16. Inagaki, A., S. Schoenmakers, and W. M. Baarends, 2010 DNA double strand break repair, chromosome synapsis and transcriptional silencing in meiosis. Epigenetics 5: 255-266.
17. Jensen-Seaman, M. I., T. S. Furey, B. A. Payseur, Y. Lu, K. M. Roskin et al., 2004 Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes. Genome Res. 14: 528-538.
18. Keeney, S., F. Baudat, M. Angeles, Z. H. Zhou, N. G. Copeland et al., 1999 A mouse homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic recombination DNA transesterase Spo11p. Genomics 61: 170-182.
19. Klein, I. A.,W. Resch,M. Jankovic, T. Oliveira, A. Yamane et al., 2011 Translocationcapture sequencing reveals the extent and nature of chromosomal rearrangements in B lymphocytes. Cell 147: 95-106.
20. Klein, U., G. Esposito, F. Baudat, S. Keeney, and M. Jasin, 2002 Mice deficient for the type II topoisomerase-like DNA transesterase Spo11 show normal immunoglobulin somatic hypermutation and class switching. Eur. J. Immunol. 32: 316-321.
21. Larijani, M., D. Frieder, T. M. Sonbuchner, R. Bransteitter, M. F. Goodman et al., 2005 Methylation protects cytidines from AID-mediated deamination. Mol. Immunol. 42: 599-604.
22. Lenormand, T., and J. Dutheil, 2005 Recombination difference between sexes: a role for haploid selection. PLoS Biol. 3: e63.
23. Lercher, M. J., and L. D. Hurst, 2003 Imprinted chromosomal regions of the human genome have unusually high recombination rates. Genetics 165: 1629-1632.
24. Liu, M., J. L. Duke, D. J. Richter, C. G. Vinuesa, C. C. Goodnow et al., 2008 Two levels of protection for the B cell genome during somatic hypermutation. Nature 451: 841-845.
25. Lynn, A., S. Schrump, J. Cherry, T. Hassold, and P. Hunt, 2005 Sex, not genotype, determines recombination levels in mice. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77: 670-675.
26. MacDuff, D. A., Z. L. Demorest, and R. S. Harris, 2009 AID can restrict L1 retrotransposition suggesting a dual role in innate and adaptive immunity. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: 1854-1867.
27. Morgan, H. D., W. Dean, H. A. Coker, W. Reik, and S. K. Petersen-Mahrt, 2004 Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates 5-methylcytosine in DNA and is expressed in pluripotent tissues: implications for epigenetic reprogramming. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 52353-52360.
28. Muramatsu, M., K. Kinoshita, S. Fagarasan, S. Yamada, Y. Shinkai et al., 2000 Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102: 553-563.
29. Page, J., R. de la Fuente, M. Manterola, M. T. Parra, A. Viera et al., 2012 Inactivation or non-reactivation: what accounts better for the silence of sex chromosomes during mammalian male meiosis? Chromosoma 121: 307-326.
30. Paigen, K., J. P. Szatkiewicz, K. Sawyer, N. Leahy, E. D. Parvanov et al., 2008 The recombinational anatomy of a mouse chromosome. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000119.
31. Pauklin, S., J. S. Burkert, J. Martin, F. Osman, S.Weller et al., 2009 Alternative induction of meiotic recombination from single-base lesions of DNA deaminases. Genetics 182: 41-54.
32. Petersen, S., R. Casellas, B. Reina-San-Martin, H. T. Chen, M. J. Difilippantonio et al., 2001 AID is required to initiate Nbs1/gamma-H2AX focus formation and mutations at sites of class switching. Nature 414: 660-665.
33. Petersen-Mahrt, S. K., R. S. Harris, and M. S. Neuberger, 2002 AID mutates E. coli suggesting a DNA deamination mechanism for antibody diversification. Nature 418: 99-103.
34. Petkov, P. M., K.W. Broman, J. P. Szatkiewicz, and K. Paigen, 2007 Crossover interference underlies sex differences in recombination rates. Trends Genet. 23: 539-542.
35. Pfaffl, M.W., 2001 A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: e45.
36. Popp, C., W. Dean, S. Feng, S. J. Cokus, S. Andrews et al., 2010 Genomewide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463: 1101-1105.
37. Qin, H., K. Suzuki, M. Nakata, S. Chikuma, N. Izumi et al., 2011 Activationinduced cytidine deaminase expression in CD4+ T cells is associated with a unique IL-10-producing subset that increases with age. PLoS ONE 6: e29141.
38. Rai, K., I. J. Huggins, S. R. James, A. R. Karpf, D. A. Jones et al., 2008 DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 135: 1201-1212.
39. Revy, P., T. Muto, Y. Levy, F. Geissmann, A. Plebani et al., 2000 Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) deficiency causes the autosomal recessive form of the Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM2). Cell 102: 565-575.
40. Romanienko, P. J., and R. D. Camerini-Otero, 1999 Cloning, characterization, and localization of mouse and human SPO11. Genomics 61: 156-169.
41. Romanienko, P. J., and R. D. Camerini-Otero, 2000 The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol. Cell 6: 975-987.
42. Schrader, C. E., J. E. J. Guikema, E. K. Linehan, E. Selsing, and J. Stavnezer, 2007 Activation-induced cytidine deaminase-dependent DNA breaks in class switch recombination occur during G1 phase of the cell cycle and depend upon mismatch repair. J. Immunol. 179: 6064-6071.
43. Schreck, S., M. Buettner, E. Kremmer, M. Bogdan, H. Herbst et al., 2006 Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is expressed in normal spermatogenesis but only infrequently in testicular germ cell tumours. J. Pathol. 210: 26-31.
44. Shifman, S., J. T. Bell, R. R. Copley, M. S. Taylor, R. W. Williams et al., 2006 A high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism genetic map of the mouse genome. PLoS Biol. 4: e395.
45. Smagulova, F., I. V. Gregoretti, K. Brick, P. Khil, R. D. Camerini-Otero et al., 2011 Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472: 375-378.
46. Tonegawa, S., 1983 Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature 302: 575-581.
47. Wijesinghe, P., and A. S. Bhagwat, 2012 Efficient deamination of 5-methylcytosines in DNA by human APOBEC3A, but not by AID or APOBEC3G. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: 9206-9217.