Novel autoproteolytic and DNA-damage sensing components in the bacterial SOS response and oxidized methylcytosine-induced eukaryotic DNA demethylation systems

Biology Direct

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Aravind, L ^a   Anand, Swadha ^a   Iyer, Lakshminarayan M ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DNA; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; PEPTIDE HYDROLASE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA METHYLATION; DNA REPAIR; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIF; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA METHYLATION; DNA, BACTERIAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIFS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PEPTIDE HYDROLASES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOS RESPONSE (GENETICS);

EID: 84883019152     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-8-20     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Erill I, Campoy S, Barbe J. Aeons of distress: an evolutionary perspective on the bacterial SOS response. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2007, 31(6):637-656. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00082.x, 17883408.
2. Michel B. After 30 years of study, the bacterial SOS response still surprises us. PLoS Biol 2005, 3(7):e255. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030255, 1174825, 16000023.
3. Radman M. SOS repair hypothesis: phenomenology of an inducible DNA repair which is accompanied by mutagenesis. Basic Life Sci 1975, 5A:355-367.
4. Sutton MD, Smith BT, Godoy VG, Walker GC. The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance. Annu Rev Genet 2000, 34:479-497. 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.479, 11092836.
5. Keller KL, Overbeck-Carrick TL, Beck DJ. Survival and induction of SOS in Escherichia coli treated with cisplatin, UV-irradiation, or mitomycin C are dependent on the function of the RecBC and RecFOR pathways of homologous recombination. Mutat Res 2001, 486(1):21-29. 10.1016/S0921-8777(01)00077-5, 11356333.
6. Fernandez De Henestrosa AR, Ogi T, Aoyagi S, Chafin D, Hayes JJ, Ohmori H, Woodgate R. Identification of additional genes belonging to the LexA regulon in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 2000, 35(6):1560-1572.
7. Sassanfar M, Roberts JW. Nature of the SOS-inducing signal in Escherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication. J Mol Biol 1990, 212(1):79-96. 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90306-7, 2108251.
8. Tippin B, Pham P, Goodman MF. Error-prone replication for better or worse. Trends Microbiol 2004, 12(6):288-295. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.04.004, 15165607.
9. Warner DF, Ndwandwe DE, Abrahams GL, Kana BD, Machowski EE, Venclovas C, Mizrahi V. Essential roles for imuA'- and imuB-encoded accessory factors in DnaE2-dependent mutagenesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107(29):13093-13098. 10.1073/pnas.1002614107, 2919956, 20615954.
10. Galhardo RS, Rocha RP, Marques MV, Menck CF. An SOS-regulated operon involved in damage-inducible mutagenesis in Caulobacter crescentus. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(8):2603-2614. 10.1093/nar/gki551, 1092274, 15886391.
11. McKenzie GJ, Lee PL, Lombardo MJ, Hastings PJ, Rosenberg SM. SOS mutator DNA polymerase IV functions in adaptive mutation and not adaptive amplification. Mol Cell 2001, 7(3):571-579. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00204-0, 11463382.
12. Sharma A, Kottur J, Narayanan N, Nair DT. A strategically located serine residue is critical for the mutator activity of DNA polymerase IV from Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41(9):5104-5114. 10.1093/nar/gkt146, 3643571, 23525461.
13. Miller C, Thomsen LE, Gaggero C, Mosseri R, Ingmer H, Cohen SN. SOS response induction by beta-lactams and bacterial defense against antibiotic lethality. Science 2004, 305(5690):1629-1631. 10.1126/science.1101630, 15308764.
14. Permina EA, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS. Damage-repair error-prone polymerases of eubacteria: association with mobile genome elements. Gene 2002, 293(1-2):133-140.
15. Sanchez-Alberola N, Campoy S, Barbe J, Erill I. Analysis of the SOS response of Vibrio and other bacteria with multiple chromosomes. BMC Genom 2012, 13:58.
16. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunasekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D211-D222. Database issue, 10.1093/nar/gkp985, 2808889, 19920124.
17. Aravind L, Koonin EV. Prokaryotic homologs of the eukaryotic DNA-end-binding protein Ku, novel domains in the Ku protein and prediction of a prokaryotic double-strand break repair system. Genome Res 2001, 11(8):1365-1374. 10.1101/gr.181001, 311082, 11483577.
18. Pruteanu M, Baker TA. Proteolysis in the SOS response and metal homeostasis in Escherichia coli. Res Microbiol 2009, 160(9):677-683. 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.08.012, 2783568, 19747971.
19. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D419-D425. Database issue, 2238974, 18000004.
20. Aravind L, Walker DR, Koonin EV. Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27(5):1223-1242. 10.1093/nar/27.5.1223, 148307, 9973609.
21. Spruijt CG, Gnerlich F, Smits AH, Pfaffeneder T, Jansen PW, Bauer C, Munzel M, Wagner M, Muller M, Khan F, et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell 2013, 152(5):1146-1159. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.004, 23434322.
22. Pastor WA, Aravind L, Rao A. TETonic shift: biological roles of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013, 14(6):341-356. 10.1038/nrm3589, 23698584.
23. Li L. Mechanistic studies of the radical SAM enzyme spore photoproduct lyase (SPL). Biochim Biophys Acta 2012, 1824(11):1264-1277. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.11.008, 22197590.
24. Hashimoto H, Hong S, Bhagwat AS, Zhang X, Cheng X. Excision of 5-hydroxymethyluracil and 5-carboxylcytosine by the thymine DNA glycosylase domain: its structural basis and implications for active DNA demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40(20):10203-10214. 10.1093/nar/gks845, 3488261, 22962365.
25. He YF, Li BZ, Li Z, Liu P, Wang Y, Tang Q, Ding J, Jia Y, Chen Z, Li L, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 2011, 333(6047):1303-1307. 10.1126/science.1210944, 3462231, 21817016.
26. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25(17):3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389, 146917, 9254694.
27. Eddy SR. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform 2009, 23(1):205-211.
28. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinforma 2004, 5:113.
29. Cuff JA, Clamp ME, Siddiqui AS, Finlay M, Barton GJ. JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 1998, 14(10):892-893. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.10.892, 9927721.