Conversing through and about technologies: Design critique as an opportunity to engage children with autism and broaden research(er) perspectives

International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 38-49

  Frauenberger, Christopher ^a   Good, Judith ^a   Alcorn, Alyssa ^b   Pain, Helen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882736365     PISSN: 22128689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2013.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Blevis E., Lim Y.-k., Roedl D., Stolterman E. Using design critique as research to link sustainability and interactive technologies. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Online Communities and Social Computing, OCSC'07 2007, 22-31. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, URL http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1784297.1784301.
2. Porayska-Pomsta K., Frauenberger C., Pain H., Rajendran G., Smith T., Menzies R., Foster M., Alcorn A., Wass S., Bernadini S., Avramides K., Keay-Bright W., Chen J., Waller A., Guldberg K., Good J., Lemon O. Developing technology for autism: an interdisciplinary approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2011, 16(2):117-127.
3. Joseph R.M., Tager-Flusberg H., Lord C. Cognitive profiles and social-communicative functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2002, 43(6):807-821.
4. Frauenberger C., Good J., Keay-Bright W.E. Designing technology for children with special needs - bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 2011, 7(1):1-28.
5. D. Murray, M. Lesser, Autism and computing, in: Proceedings of Autism99 online conference organised by the NAS with the Shirley Foundation, 1999.
6. Golan O., Ashwin E., Granader Y., McClintock S., Day K., Leggett V., Baron-Cohen S. Enhancing emotion recognition in children with autism spectrum conditions: an intervention using animated vehicles with real emotional faces. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2010, 40(3):269-279.
7. Nazneen F., Boujarwah F.A., Sadler S., Mogus A., Abowd G.D., Arriaga R.I. Understanding the challenges and opportunities for richer descriptions of stereotypical behaviors of children with asd: a concept exploration and validation. Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS '10 2010, 67-74. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
8. Hayes G.R., Hirano S., Marcu G., Monibi M., Nguyen D.H., Yeganyan M. Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2010, 14:663-680.
9. Tentori M., Hayes G.R. Designing for interaction immediacy to enhance social skills of children with autism. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Ubicomp'10 2010, 51-60. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
10. Farr W., Yuill N., Raffle H. Social benefits of a tangible user interface for children with Autistic Spectrum Conditions. Autism 2010, 14(3):237-252.
11. Hourcade J., Bullock-Rest N., Hansen T. Multitouch tablet applications and activities to enhance the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorders. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2011, 1-12.
12. Druin A. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 2002, 21(1):1-25. URL http://hcil.cs.umd.edu/trs/99-23/99-23.html.
13. Hirano S.H., Yeganyan M.T., Marcu G., Nguyen D.H., Boyd L.A., Hayes G.R. vSked: evaluation of a system to support classroom activities for children with autism. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'10 2010, 1633-1642. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
14. Keay-Bright W.E. The reactive colours project: demonstrating participatory and collaborative design methods for the creation of software for autistic children. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal 2007, 1(2):7-16. URL http://ijg.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.154/prod.17.
15. H. van Rijn, P.J. Stappers, Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process, in: Proceedings Participatory Design Conference, 2008, pp. 36-39.
16. Benton L., Johnson H., Brosnan M., Ashwin E., Grawemeyer B. IDEAS: an interface design experience for the autistic spectrum. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI EA'11 2011, 1759-1764. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
17. Millen L., Cobb S., Patel H. A method for involving children with autism in design. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC'11 2011, 185-188. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
18. Good J., Robertson J. CARSS: a framework for learner-centred design with children. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 2006, 16(4):381-413. URL http://iospress.metapress.com/index/ECGE8W1BLA92DELW.pdf.
19. Scaife M., Rogers Y., Aldrich F., Davies M. Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. CHI'97: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1997, 343-350. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
20. Guha M., Druin A., Chipman G., Fails J., Simms S., Farber A. Working with young children as technology design partners. Communications of the ACM 2005, 48(1):39-42. URL http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1039539.1039567.
21. Murray D., Lesser M., Lawson W. Attention, monotropism and the diagnostic criteria for autism. Autism 2005, 9(2):139-156. URL http://aut.sagepub.com/content/9/2/139.abstract.
22. Baron-Cohen S. Theory of mind and autism: a review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation 2000, vol. 23:169-184. Academic Press, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0074775000800105. L.M. Glidden (Ed.).
23. Attwood T. The Complete Guide to Asperger's Syndrome 2008, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
24. Baron-Cohen S. Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: cognitive or affective?. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 1988, 18:379-402.
25. Gutstein S.E., Whitney T. Asperger syndrome and the development of social competence. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 2002, 17(3):161-171.
26. Prizant B., Wetherby A., Rubin E., Laurent A., Rydell P. The SCERTS™Model: A Comprehensive Educational Approach for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders 2005, Brookes Publishing Company, Baltimore, MD, USA.
27. Turner M. Annotation: repetitive behaviour in autism: a review of psychological research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1999, 40(6):839-849.
28. Frauenberger C., Good J., Keay-Bright W.E., Pain H. Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach. CHI'12: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012, 2377-2386. ACM, New York, NY, USA, New York, NY, USA. S. Bødker, D. Olsen (Eds.).
29. Frauenberger C., Good J., Keay-Bright W.E. Phenomenology, a framework for participatory design. Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference 2010, 187-190. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
30. A. Alcorn, H. Pain, G. Rajendran, T. Smith, O. Lemon, K. Porayska-Pomsta, M.E. Foster, K. Avramides, C. Frauenberger, S. Bernardini, Social communication between virtual characters and children with autism, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED, 2011.
31. R. Wakkary, A participatory design understanding of interaction design, in: Science of Design Workshop, CHI 2007, San Jose, CA, USA, 2007.
32. M.J. Muller, The human-computer interaction handbook, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, UK, Ch. Participatory Design: The third Space in HCI, 2003, pp. 1051-1068.
33. Rittel H., Webber M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 1973, 4(2):155-169.
34. Stolterman E. The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design 2008, 2(1). URL http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/240.
35. Cross N. Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Design Issues 2001, 17(3):49-55.
36. Harrison S., Sengers P., Tatar D. Making epistemological trouble: third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers 2011, 23:385-392.
37. Zimmerman J., Forlizzi J., Evenson S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. CHI'07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007, 493-502. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
38. Gaver W. What should we expect from research through design?. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'12 2012, 937-946. ACM, New York, NY, USA, URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2208516.2208538.
39. Greenwood D.J., Levin M. Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change 2007, Sage Publications, Inc. 2nd Edition.