The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research

International Journal of Design

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 55-65

  Stolterman, Erik ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design research; Interaction design; Nature of design

Indexed keywords

EID: 51149097501     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Atwood, M. E., McCain, K. W., & Williams, J. C. (2002). How does the design community think about design. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 125-132), New York: ACM Press.
3. Bartneck, C. (2007). Design methodology is not design science. Paper presented at the The CHI 2007 workshop: Converging on a science of design through the synthesis of design methodologies, San Jose, CA.
4. Bartneck, C. (2007). Quality criteria for design and science. Paper presented at the The CHI 2007 workshop: Exploring design as a research activity, San Jose, CA.
5. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.
6. Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experience-Getting the design right and the right design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
7. Carroll, J. M. (2003). HCI models, theories and frameworks. Oxford: Elsevier Publishing.
8. Carroll, J. M., & Kellogg, W. A. (1989). Artifact as theorynexus: Hermeneutics meets theory-based design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 20(SI), 7-14.
9. Castells, E. (1996). Rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
10. Coburn, P. (2006). The change function-Why some technologies take off and others crash and burn. New York: Penguin Books.
11. Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Studies, 17(3), 49-55.
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
13. Dillon, A. (1995). Artifacts as theories: Convergence through user-centered design. Paper presented at the 58th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Medford, NJ. Retrieved November 17, 2007, from http://faculty-l.slis.kent.edu/drobins/publications.html
14. Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 541-550). New York: ACM Press.
15. Dunne, J. (1993). Back to the rough ground: 'Phronesis' and 'Techné' in modern philosophy and in Aristotle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
16. Ehn, P., & Löwgren, J. (1997). Design for quality-in-use: Human-computer interaction meets systems development. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2th ed., pp. 299-313). New York: Elsevier.
17. Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 225-232). New York: ACM Press.
18. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
19. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
20. Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16(33), 395-429.
21. Greenfield, A. (2006). Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
22. Heskett, J. (2002). Design: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford Press.
23. Janlert, L.-E., & Stolterman, E. (1997). The character of things. Design Studies, 18(3), 297-314.
24. Johnson, C. (Ed.). (2005). Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Complexity in Design and Engineering. Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
25. Kolko, J. (2007). Thoughts on interaction design. Savannah, GA: Brown Bear.
26. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
27. Laurel, B. (2003). Design research: Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think: The design process demystified. Boston: Architectural Press.
29. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Maeda, J. (2006). The laws of simplicity: Design, technology, business, life. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
31. McCarty, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. McCullogh, M. (2004). Digital ground architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. National Science Foundation. (2004). Science of design: Program solicitation. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04552/nsf04552.htm
35. Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
36. Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
37. Pink, D. H. (2005). A whole new mind: Moving from information age to the conceptual age. New York: Riverhead Books.
38. Pye, D. (1995). The nature and aesthetics of design (Reprint ed.). Bethel, CT: Cambium Press.
39. Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1974). Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Design Research and Methods, 8(1), 31-39.
40. Rove, P. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Rogers, Y. (2004) New theoretical approaches for humancomputer interaction. In B. Cronin (Vol. Ed.), Annual review of information, science and technology: Vol. 38 (pp. 87-143). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
42. Russo, N., & Stolterman, E. (1998). Uncovering the assumptions behind information systems methodologies: Implications for research and practice. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 896-909). Granada, Spain: Euro-Arab Management School.
43. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
44. Science. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/science
45. Simon, H. (1969). The science of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Stolterman, E. (1994). The transfer of rationality:Adaptability, acceptability and the transparency of methods. In W. Baets (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 533-540). Breukelen: Nijenrode University Press.
47. Taylor, P. (2003). Designerly thinking: What software methodology can learn from design theory. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Simulation Symposium (pp. 107-116). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
48. Thackara, J. (2005). In the bubble: Designing in a complex world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Wania, C. E., Atwood, M. E., & McCain, K. W. (2006). How do design and evaluation interrelate in HCI research. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 90-98). New York: ACM Press.
50. Winograd, T. (1996). Bringing design to software. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
51. Wolf, T. V., Rode, J., Sussman, J., & Kellogg, W. (2006). Dispelling design as the black art of CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 521-530). New York: ACM Press.
52. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 493-502). New York: ACM Press.