Otoacoustic Emissions

The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 237-261

  Siegel, J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ac voltage dependence; Active cochlear mechanics; Adaptation; Cochlear amplifier; Cochlear microphonic; Compressive nonlinearity; Distortion emissions; Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE); Hair cell transduction; Hair cells; Otoacoustic emissions; Outer hair cells; Place fixed otoacoustic emissions; Prestin; Quasilinearity; Reflection emissions; Somatic motility; Spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE); Stereocilia bundle motor; Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAE); Theory of coherent linear reflection filtering (CRF); Transduction channels; Transduction current; Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE); Wave fixed otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882457258     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012370880-9.00023-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (210)

1. Anderson S.D. Some ECMR properties in relation to other signals from the auditory periphery. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:273-296.
2. Anderson S.D., Kemp D.T. The evoked cochlear mechanical response in laboratory primates. A preliminary report. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979, 224:47-54.
3. Békésy G. Experiments in Hearing 1960, McGraw-Hill.
4. Bialek W., Wit H.P. Quantum limits to oscillator stability: theory and experiments on acoustic emissions from the human ear. Phys. Lett. 1984, 104A:173-178. (Abstract).
5. Bray P., Kemp D. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br. J. Audiol. 1987, 21:191-204.
6. Brown A.M., Harris F.P., Beveridge H.A. Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 100:3260-3267.
7. Brownell W.E. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 1990, 11:82-92.
8. Burns E.M., Keefe D.H., Ling R. Energy reflectance in the ear canal can exceed unity near spontaneous otoacoustic emission frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:462-474.
9. Carvalho S., Mom T., Gilain L., Avan P. Frequency specificity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions produced by high-level tones despite inefficient cochlear electromechanical feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116:1639-1648.
10. 2+ current-driven nonlinear amplification by the mammalian cochlea in vitro. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:149-155.
11. Chan D.K., Hudspeth A.J. Mechanical responses of the organ of Corti to acoustic and electrical stimulation in vitro. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:4382-4395.
12. Cheatham M.A., Dallos P. Two-tone interactions in inner hair cell receptor potentials: AC versus DC effects. Hear. Res. 1990, 43:135-139.
13. Cody A.R. Acoustic lesions in the mammalian cochlea: implications for the spatial distribution of the 'active process'. Hear. Res. 1992, 62:166-172.
14. Crawford A.C., Fettiplace R. The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells. J. Physiol. 1985, 364:359-379.
15. Dallos P.J. On the generation of odd-fractional subharmonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1966, 40:1381-1391.
16. Dallos P. The Auditory Periphery 1973, Academic Press.
17. Dallos P., Cheatham M.A. Nonlinearities in cochlear receptor potentials and their origins. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 86:1790-1796.
18. Dallos P., Harris D. Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. J. Neurophysiol. 1978, 41:365-383.
19. Dallos P.J., Linnell C.O. Subharmonic components in cochlear-microphonic potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1966, 40:4-11.
20. de Boer E. Nonlinear interactions and the 'Kemp echo'. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:519-526.
21. Dhar S., Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Tubis A. Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002, 112:2882-2897.
22. Dreisbach L.E., Siegel J.H. Level dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 117:2980-2988.
23. Fahey P.F., Stagner B.B., Martin G.K. Mechanism for bandpass frequency characteristic in distortion product otoacoustic emission generation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 119:991-996.
24. Fettiplace R. Active hair bundle movements in auditory hair cells. J. Physiol. 2006, 576:29-36.
25. Fridberger A., de Monvel J.B., Zheng J., Hu N., Zou Y., Ren T., Nuttall A. Organ of Corti potentials and the motion of the basilar membrane. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:10057-10063.
26. Goblick T.J., Pfeiffer R.R. Time-domain measurements of cochlear nonlinearities using combination click stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1969, 46:924-938.
27. Gold T. Hearing. II. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 1948, 135:492-498. (Abstract).
28. Goldstein J.L. Auditory nonlinearity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1967, 41:676-689.
29. Goodman S.S., Withnell R.H., Shera C.A. The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 2003, 183:7-17.
30. Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Dorn P.A. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards. Ear Hear. 1999, 20:345-362.
31. Grosh K., Zheng J., Zou Y., de Boer E., Nuttall A.L. High-frequency electromotile responses in the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 115:2178-2184.
32. Guinan J.J. Changes in Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Produced by Two-Tone Suppression and Efferent Stimulation in Cats. Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing 1990, 170-177. Springer. P. Dallos, C.D. Geisler, J.W. Matthews, C.R. Steele (Eds.).
33. He W., Nuttall A.L., Ren T. Two-tone distortion at different longitudinal locations on the basilar membrane. Hear. Res. 2007, 228:112-122.
34. 2removes DP-gram fine structure - evidence for a secondary generator. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:1527-1531.
35. Hu N., Nuttall A.L., Ren T. Spatial distribution of electrically induced high frequency vibration on basilar membrane. Hear. Res. 2005, 202:35-46.
36. Hubbard A.E., Mountain D.C. Alternating current delivered into the scala media alters sound pressure at the eardrum. Science 1983, 222:510-512.
37. Iwasa K.H., Adachi M. Force generation in the outer hair cell of the cochlea. Biophys. J. 1997, 73:546-555.
38. Jaramillo F., Markin V.S., Hudspeth A.J. Auditory illusions and the single hair cell. Nature 1993, 364:527-529.
39. Kalluri R., Shera C.A. Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109:622-637.
40. Kalluri R., Shera C.A. Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:2097-2110.
41. Karavitaki K.D., Mountain D.C. Imaging electrically evoked micromechanical motion within the organ of Corti of the excised gerbil cochlea. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:3294-3316.
42. Keefe D.H. Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Measurement theory and nonlinear coherence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:3489-3498.
43. Keefe D.H., Ling R. Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Intermittent noise rejection, calibration and ear-canal measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:3499-3508.
44. Kemp D.T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1978, 64:1386-1391.
45. Kemp D.T. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 1979, 224:37-45.
46. Kemp D.T. The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 1979, 35-47.
47. Kemp D.T. Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:533-548.
48. Kemp D.T. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear. Res. 1986, 22:95-104.
49. Kemp D.T. Exploring Cochlear Status with Otoacoustic Emissions: The Potential for New Clinical Applications. Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications 2007, 7-42. Thieme Medical Publishers. 3rd edn. M.S. Robinette, T.J. Glattke (Eds.).
50. Kemp D.T., Brown A.M. An Integrated View of Cochlear Mechanical Nonlinearities Observable from the Ear Canal. Mechanics of Hearing 1983, 75-82. Delft University Press. E. deBoer, M.A. Viergever (Eds.).
51. Kemp D.T., Brown A.M. Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f1-f2 distortion generated in the cochlea. Hear. Res. 1984, 13:39-46.
52. Kemp D.T., Chum R. Observations on the Generator Mechanism of Stimulus Frequency Acoustic Emissions - Two Tone Suppression. Psychophysical Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing 1980, 34-42. Delft University Press. G.V.D. Brink, F.A. Bilsen (Eds.).
53. Kemp D.T., Chum R. Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:213-232.
54. Kemp D.T., Bray P., Alexander L., Brown A.M. Acoustic emission cochleography - practical aspects. Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 1986, 25:71-95.
55. Kennedy H.J., Crawford A.C., Fettiplace R. Force generation by mammalian hair bundles supports a role in cochlear amplification. Nature 2005, 433:880-883.
56. Kiang N.Y.S., Watanabe T., Thomas E.C., Clark L.F. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve 1965, MIT Press.
57. Kim D.O. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:297-317.
58. Kim D.O., Molnar C.E., Matthews J.W. Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1980, 67:1704-1721.
59. Kim D.O., Siegel J.H., Molnar C.E. Cochlear nonlinear phenomena in two-tone responses. Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 1979, 9:63-81.
60. Kros C.J., Lennan G.W.T., Richardson G.P. Voltage Dependence of Transducer Currents in Outer Hair Cells of Neonatal Mice. Active Hearing 1995, 113-125. Elsevier Science. A. Flock (Ed.).
61. Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L., Heller L.M., Hughes L.M. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120:280-296.
62. Liberman M.C., Zuo J., Guinan J.J. Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116:1649-1655.
63. Long G.R. The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds. Hear. Res. 1984, 15:73-87.
64. Long G.R., Tubis A. Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1988, 36:125-138.
65. Lu T.K., Zhak S., Dallos P., Sarpeshkar R. Fast cochlear amplification with slow outer hair cells. Hear. Res. 2006, 214:45-67.
66. Lukashkin A.N., Russell I.J. A descriptive model of the receptor potential nonlinearities generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:973-980.
67. Lukashkin A.N., Lukashkina V.A., Russell I.J. One source for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generated by low- and high-level primaries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002, 111:2740-2748.
68. Mahoney C.F., Kemp D.T. Distortion product otoacoustic emission delay measurement in human ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 97:3721-3735.
69. Manley G.A. Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in nonmammals. J. Neurophysiol. 2001, 86:541-549.
70. Manley G.A., Kirk D.L., Koppl C., Yates G.K. In vivo evidence for a cochlear amplifier in the hair-cell bundle of lizards. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:2826-2831.
71. Martin P., Hudspeth A.J. Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundle's active response to mechanical stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:14386-14391.
72. Martin P., Hudspeth A.J., Julicher F. Comparison of a hair bundle's spontaneous oscillations with its response to mechanical stimulation reveals the underlying active process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:14380-14385.
73. Martin G.K., Ohlms L.A., Franklin D.J., Harris F.P., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Distortion product emissions in humans. III. Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 1990, 147:30-42.
74. Martin G.K., Stagner B.B., Jassir D., Telischi F.F., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). I. Basic findings in rabbits. Hear. Res. 1999, 136:105-123.
75. Martin G.K., Villasuso E.I., Stagner B.B., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans. Hear. Res. 2003, 177:111-122.
76. Mauermann M., Long G.R., Kollmeier B. Fine structure of hearing threshold and loudness perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116:1066-1080.
77. Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Rapid force production in the cochlea. Hear. Res. 1989, 42:195-202.
78. Nuttall A.L., Ren T. Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1995, 92:170-177.
79. Nuttall A.L., Grosh K., Zheng J., de Boer E., Zou Y., Ren T. Spontaneous basilar membrane oscillation and otoacoustic emission at 15 kHz in a guinea pig. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2004, 5:337-348.
80. Nuttall A.L., Zheng J., Ren T., de Boer E. Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from apical and basal perilymphatic electrode positions in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 2001, 152:77-89.
81. Patuzzi R. Cochlear Micromechanics and Macromechanics. The Cochlea 1996, 186-257. Springer. P. Dallos, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
82. Pfeiffer R.R., Kim D.O. Cochlear nerve fiber responses: distribution along the cochlear partition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1975, 58:867-869.
83. Powers N.L., Salvi R.J., Wang J., Spongr V., Qiu C.X. Elevation of auditory thresholds by spontaneous cochlear oscillations. Nature 1995, 375:585-587.
84. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1991, 89:2027-2067.
85. Recio A., Rich N.C., Narayan S.S., Ruggero M.A. Basilar-membrane responses to clicks at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:1972-1989.
86. Ren T. Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99:17101-17106.
87. Ren T. Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:333-334.
88. Rhode W.S. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mossbauer technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1971, 49:1218-1231.
89. Rhode W.S. Some observations on cochlear mechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1978, 64:158-176.
90. Rhode W.S. Basilar membrane mechanics in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:2792-2804.
91. Ricci A.J., Kennedy H.J., Crawford A.C., Fettiplace R. The transduction channel filter in auditory hair cells. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:7831-7839.
92. Robles L., Ruggero M.A. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81:1305-1352.
93. Ruggero M.A., Temchin A.N. Similarity of traveling-wave delays in the hearing organs of humans and other tetrapods. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2007, 8:153-166.
94. Ruggero M.A., Kramek B., Rich N.C. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a dog. Hear. Res. 1984, 13:293-296.
95. Russell I.J., Sellick P.M. Tuning properties of cochlear hair cells. Nature 1977, 267:858-860.
96. Rutten W.L. Evoked acoustic emissions from within normal and abnormal human ears: comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:263-271.
97. Ryan A., Dallos P. Effect of absence of cochlear outer hair cells on behavioural auditory threshold. Nature 1975, 253:44-46.
98. Santos-Sacchi J. On the frequency limit and phase of outer hair cell motility: effects of the membrane filter. J. Neurosci. 1992, 12:1906-1916.
99. Schairer K.S., Keefe D.H. Simultaneous recording of stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions in human ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 117:818-832.
100. Schairer K.S., Fitzpatrick D., Keefe D.H. Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 114:944-966.
101. Shera C.A. Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 114:244-262.
102. Shera C.A. Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 2004, 25:86-97.
103. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 105:782-798.
104. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J. Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 113:2762-2772.
105. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J. Cochlear traveling-wave amplification, suppression, and beamforming probed using noninvasive calibration of intracochlear distortion sources. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:1003-1016.
106. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J., Oxenham A.J. Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99:3318-3323.
107. Shera C.A., Tubis A., Talmadge C.L. Models of reflection- and distortion-source oaes with and without slow transverse retrograde waves. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abst. 2005, 28:231. Available at:. http://web.mit.edu/apg/shera-tubis-talmadge-ARO2005.pdf.
108. Shera C.A., Tubis A., Talmadge C.L., de Boer E., Fahe P.F., Guinan J.J. Allen-Fahey and related experiments support the predominance of cochlear slow-wave otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:1564-1575.
109. Siegel J.H. The Biophysical Origin of Otoacoustic Emissions. Auditory Mechanisms: Processes and Models 2006, 361-368. World Scientific. A.L. Nuttall, T. Ren, P. Gillespe, K. Grosh, E. deBoer (Eds.).
110. Siegel J.H., Cerka A.J., Recio-Spinoso A., Temchin A.N., van Dijk P., Ruggero M.A. Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 118:2434-2443.
111. Siegel J.H., Kim D.O., Molnar C.E. Effects of altering the organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2-f1 and 2f1-f2. J. Neurophysiol. 1982, 47:303-328.
112. Smoorenburg G.F. Combination tones and their origin. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1972, 52:615-632.
113. Strube H.W. Evoked otoacoustic emissions as cochlear Bragg reflections. Hear. Res. 1989, 38:35-45.
114. Sutton L.A., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K., Whitehead M.L. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear. Res. 1994, 75:161-174.
115. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Tubis A., Dhar S. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 105:275-292.
116. Talmadge C.L., Tubis A., Long G.R., Tong C. Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108:2911-2932.
117. Talmadge C.L., Tubis A., Wit H.P., Long G.R. Are spontaneous otoacoustic emissions generated by self-sustained cochlear oscillators?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1991, 89:2391-2399.
118. Tasaki I. Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig. J. Neurophysiol. 1954, 17:97-122.
119. Tubis A., Talmadge C.L. Ear canal reflectance in the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Limit-cycle oscillator model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:454-461.
120. van Dijk P., Narins P.M., Wang J. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in seven frog species. Hear. Res. 1996, 101:102-112.
121. Weiss T.F. Bidirectional transduction in vertebrate hair cells: a mechanism for coupling mechanical and electrical processes. Hear. Res. 1982, 7:353-360.
122. Whitehead M.L., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 92:2662-2682.
123. Whitehead M.L., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 91:1587-1607.
124. Wilson J.P. Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:233-252.
125. Wilson J.P. Model for cochlear echoes and tinnitus based on an observed electrical correlate. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:527-532.
126. Wit H.P., Ritsma R.J. Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1979, 66:911-913.
127. Wit H.P., Ritsma R.J. Evoked acoustical responses from the human ear: some experimental results. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:253-261.
128. Xue S., Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Acoustic enhancement of electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: experiment results. Hear. Res. 1993, 70:121-126.
129. Xue S., Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Electrically evoked basilar membrane motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 97:3030-3041.
130. Zweig G., Shera C.A. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 98:2018-2047.
131. Zwicker E., Schloth E. Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984, 75:1148-1154.
132. Zwislocki J. Analysis of the middle-ear function: Part I: Input impedance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1962, 34:1514-1523.
133. Abdala C., Sininger Y.S., Ekelid M., Zeng F.G. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates. Hear. Res. 1996, 98:38-53.
134. Avan P., Bonfils P., Gilain L., Mom T. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 113:430-441.
135. Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Wen H., Szabo P., Cecola R.P., Rigby P., Jackson D.F. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1993, 71:1-11.
136. Bozovic D., Hudspeth A.J. Hair-bundle movements elicited by transepithelial electrical stimulation of hair cells in the sacculus of the bullfrog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:958-963.
137. Brass D., Kemp D.T. Analyses of Mossbauer mechanical measurements indicate that the cochlea is mechanically active. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1993, 93:1502-1515.
138. Brass D., Kemp D.T. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1993, 93:920-939.
139. Brass D., Locke A. The effect of the evanescent wave upon acoustic measurements in the human ear canal. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1997, 101:2164-2175.
140. Brown A.M., Kemp D.T. Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear. Res. 1984, 13:29-37.
141. Brown A.M., Kemp D.T. Intermodulation distortion in the cochlea: could basal vibration be the major cause of round window CM distortion?. Hear. Res. 1985, 19:191-198.
142. Cheatham M.A., Huynh K.H., Gao J., Zuo J., Dallos P. Cochlear function in Prestin knockout mice. J. Physiol. 2004, 560:821-830.
143. Cooper N.P., Guinan J.J. Efferent-mediated control of basilar membrane motion. J. Physiol. 2006, 576:49-54.
144. Dallos P., Zheng J., Cheatham M.A. Prestin and the cochlear amplifier. J. Physiol. 2006, 576:37-42.
145. de Boer E., Nuttall A.L. Spontaneous basilar-membrane oscillation (SBMO) and coherent reflection. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2006, 7:26-37.
146. de Boer E., Nuttall A.L., Shera C.A. Wave propagation patterns in a "classical" three-dimensional model of the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:352-362.
147. Fahey P.F., Stagner B.B., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108:1786-1802.
148. Gaskill S.A., Brown A.M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1990, 88:821-839.
149. Gaskill S.A., Brown A.M. Suppression of human acoustic distortion product: dual origin of 2f1-f2. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 100:3268-3274.
150. Guinan J.J. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear. 2006, 27:589-607.
151. Harris F.P., Probst R., Xu L. Suppression of the 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emission in humans. Hear. Res. 1992, 64:133-141.
152. He N., Schmiedt R.A. Fine structure of the 2 f1-f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1997, 101:3554-3565.
153. Hofstetter P., Ding D., Salvi R. Induction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas from carboplatin-induced inner hair cell loss. Hear. Res. 2000, 150:132-136.
154. Hood L.J. A review of objective methods of evaluating auditory neural pathways. Laryngoscope 1999, 109:1745-1748.
155. Iwasa K.H. Current noise spectrum and capacitance due to the membrane motor of the outer hair cell: theory. Biophys. J. 1997, 73:2965-2971.
156. Kemp D.T. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br. Med. Bull. 2002, 63:223-241.
157. Kemp D.T., Brown A.M. Wideband Analysis of Otoacoustic Intermodulation. Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms 1986, 306-313. Springer. J.B. Allen, J.L. Hall, A. Hubbard, S.T. Neely, A. Tubis (Eds.).
158. Kemp D.T., Ryan S., Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 1990, 11:93-105.
159. Kennedy H.J., Evans M.G., Crawford A.C., Fettiplace R. Depolarization of cochlear outer hair cells evokes active hair bundle motion by two mechanisms. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:2757-2766.
160. Knight R.D., Kemp D.T. Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109:1513-1525.
161. Kossl M., Vater M. Evoked acoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics in the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnellii. Hear. Res. 1985, 19:157-170.
162. Legan P.K., Lukashkina V.A., Goodyear R.J., Lukashkin A.N., Verhoeven K., Van Camp G., Russell I.J., Richardson G.P. A deafness mutation isolates a second role for the tectorial membrane in hearing. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1035-1042.
163. Lim K.M., Steele C.R. A three-dimensional nonlinear active cochlear model analyzed by the WKB-numeric method. Hear. Res. 2002, 170:190-205.
164. Long G.R., Tubis A. Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1988, 36:125-138.
165. Long G.R., Tubis A. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988, 84:1343-1353.
166. Long G.R., Van Dijk P., Wit H.P. Temperature dependence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the edible frog (Rana esculenta). Hear. Res. 1996, 98:22-28.
167. Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in macaque monkeys: a replication. Hear. Res. 1988, 34:313-317.
168. Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Harris F.P., Stagner B.B., Hawkins M.D., Martin G.K. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 1990, 147:3-14.
169. Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Harris F.P., Stagner B.B., Hawkins M.D., Martin G.K. Distortion product emissions in humans. II. Relations to acoustic immittance and stimulus frequency and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 1990, 147:15-29.
170. Lukashkin A.N., Russell I.J. Origin of the bell-like dependence of the DPOAE amplitude on primary frequency ratio. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 110:3097-3106.
171. Lukashkin A.N., Russell I.J. Modifications of a single saturating non-linearity account for post-onset changes in 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002, 112:1561-1568.
172. Lukashkin A.N., Russell I.J. A second, low-frequency mode of vibration in the intact mammalian cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 113:1544-1550.
173. Lukashkin A.N., Russell I.J. Dependence of the DPOAE amplitude pattern on acoustical biasing of the cochlear partition. Hear. Res. 2005, 203:45-53.
174. Lukashkin A.N., Bashtanov M.E., Russell I.J. A self-mixing laser-diode interferometer for measuring basilar membrane vibrations without opening the cochlea. J. Neurosci. Methods 2005, 148:122-129.
175. Lukashkin A.N., Lukashkina V.A., Legan P.K., Richardson G.P., Russell I.J. Role of the tectorial membrane revealed by otoacoustic emissions recorded from wild-type and transgenic Tecta (deltaENT/deltaENT) mice. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 91:163-171.
176. Lukashkin A.N., Smith J.K., Russell I.J. Properties of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and neural suppression tuning curves attributable to the tectorial membrane resonance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:337-343.
177. Manley G.A. Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:11736-11743.
178. Martin P., Hudspeth A.J. Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cell's response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:14306-14311.
179. Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Probst R., Coats A.C. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions. Hear. Res. 1988, 33:49-68.
180. Martin P., Bozovic D., Choe Y., Hudspeth A.J. Spontaneous oscillation by hair bundles of the bullfrog's sacculus. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:4533-4548.
181. Mom T., Bonfils P., Gilain L., Avan P. Origin of cubic difference tones generated by high-intensity stimuli: effect of ischemia and auditory fatigue on the gerbil cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 110:1477-1488.
182. Mountain D.C. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 1980, 210:71-72.
183. Nadrowski B., Martin P., Julicher F. Active hair-bundle motility harnesses noise to operate near an optimum of mechanosensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:12195-12200.
184. Norton S.J., Neely S.T. Tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1987, 81:1860-1872.
185. Ren T., Nuttall A.L. Cochlear compression wave: an implication of the Allen-Fahey experiment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 119:1940-1942.
186. Ren T., He W., Scott M., Nuttall A.L. Group delay of acoustic emissions in the ear. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96:2785-2791.
187. Rhode W.S., Cooper N.P. Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae. Hear. Res. 1993, 66:31-45.
188. Rhode W.S., Robles L. Evidence from Mossbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1974, 55:588-596.
189. Ricci A. Active hair bundle movements and the cochlear amplifier. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2003, 14:325-338.
190. Ricci A.J., Crawford A.C., Fettiplace R. Mechanisms of active hair bundle motion in auditory hair cells. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:44-52.
191. Robles L., Rhode W.S., Geisler C.D. Transient response of the basilar membrane measured in squirrel monkeys using the Mossbauer effect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1976, 59:926-939.
192. Robles L., Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 77:2385-2399.
193. Russell I.J., Drexl M., Foeller E., Vater M., Kossl M. The development of a single frequency place in the mammalian cochlea: the cochlear resonance in the mustached bat Pteronotus parnellii. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:10971-10981.
194. Russell I.J., Drexl M., Foeller E., Vater M., Kossl M. Synchronization of a nonlinear oscillator: processing the cf component of the echo-response signal in the cochlea of the mustached bat. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:9508-9518.
195. Russell I.J., Legan P.K., Lukashkina V.A., Lukashkin A.N., Goodyear R.J., Richardson G.P. Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:215-223.
196. Sellick P.M., Patuzzi R., Johnstone B.M. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mossbauer technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1982, 72:131-141.
197. Shera C.A., Zweig G. Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1993, 93:3333-3352.
198. Shera C.A., Tubis A., Talmadge C.L. Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 118:287-313.
199. Siegel J.H., Kim D.O. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear. Res. 1982, 6:171-182.
200. Sisto R., Moleti A., Lucertini M. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiometrically normal and impaired subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109:638-647.
201. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Murphy W.J., Tubis A. New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects. Hear. Res. 1993, 71:170-182.
202. Trautwein P., Hofstetter P., Wang J., Salvi R., Nostrant A. Selective inner hair cell loss does not alter distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1996, 96:71-82.
203. van Dijk P., Narins P.M., Mason M.J. Physiological vulnerability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the amphibian ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 114:2044-2048.
204. van Dijk P., Wit H.P., Tubis A., Talmadge C.L., Long G.R. Correlation between amplitude and frequency fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 96:163-169.
205. van Netten S.M., Dinklo T., Marcotti W., Kros C.J. Channel gating forces govern accuracy of mechano-electrical transduction in hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:15510-15515.
206. Whitehead M.L., Stagner B.B., Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Visualization of the onset of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and measurement of their latency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 100:1663-1679.
207. Wit H.P. Amplitude fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions caused by internal and externally applied noise sources. Prog. Brain Res. 1993, 97:59-65.
208. Withnell R.H., Yates G.K. Onset of basilar membrane non-linearity reflected in cubic distortion tone input-output functions. Hear. Res. 1998, 123:87-96.
209. Zurek P.M., Clark W.W., Kim D.O. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1982, 72:774-780.
210. Zwicker E. A model describing nonlinearities in hearing by active processes with saturation at 40 dB. Biol. Cybern. 1979, 35:243-250.