Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use

British Medical Bulletin

Volumn 63, Issue , 2002, Pages 223-241

  Kemp, David T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CANAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; HAIR CELL; HUMAN; MICROPHONE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COCHLEA; HAIR CELLS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; VIBRATION;

EID: 0036397229     PISSN: 00071420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/63.1.223     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Glattke TJ, Robinette MS. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 95-115
2. Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 508-28
3. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386-91
4. Margolis RH. Influence of middle ear disease on otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 190-212
5. Yates GK. Human transient otoacoustic emissions recorded with a wideband stimulus and response system, Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2000; 22: 5112
6. Harris FP, Probst R. Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 399-405
7. Harris FP, Probst R. Otoacoustic emissions and audiometric outcomes. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 213-42
8. Prieve BA. Otoacoustic emissions in neonatal screening. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 348-74
9. Hall III WH, Handbook of Otoacoustic Emissions. San Diego, CA: Singular, 2000
10. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions: distorted echoes of the cochlea's travelling wave. In: Berlin C. (ed) Otoacoustic Emissions: Basic Science and Clinical Applications. San Diego, CA: Singular, 1998; 1-60
11. Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin GK, Telischi FF. Otoacoustic emissions in clinical practice. In: Musiek FE, Rintelmann WF. (eds) Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment, 3rd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1999; 167-96
12. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in relation to hearing loss. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 243-72
13. Boege P, Janssen TH. Pure tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 1810-18
14. Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002
15. O'Mahoney CF, Kemp DT. Distortion product otoacoustic emission delay measurement in human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3721-35
16. von Bekey G. Experiments in Hearing. New York: McGraw Hill; 1960
17. Johnstone BM, Patuzzi R, Yates GK. Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave. Hear Res 1986; 22: 147-53
18. Brass D, Kemp DT. Analyses of Mossbauer mechanical measurements indicate that the cochlea is mechanically active, J Acoust Soc Am 1993, 93: 1502-15
19. Gold T. Hearing II. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1948; 135: 492-8
20. Kemp DT. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979; 224: 37-45
21. Brownell WE. Observations on a motile response in isolated outer hair cells. In: Webster WR, Aitken L. (eds) Mechanisms of Hearing. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Press, 1983; 5-10
22. Knight RD, Kemp DT. Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 1513-25
23. Shera CA, Guinan JJ. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise from by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 782-98
24. Yates GK, Whithnell RH. Intermodulation distortion in click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1998; 21: 17
25. Kemp DT, Knight RD. Virtual DP reflector explains DPOAE wave and place fixed dichotomy. Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1999; 22: 39
26. Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220-9
27. Penner MJ, Zhang T. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in adults revisited. Hear Res 1997; 103: 28-34
28. Burns EM, Arehart KH, Campbell SL. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1571-5
29. Lepage EL, Murray NM. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: a study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 588-92
30. Kemp DT. Cochlear echoes: implications for noise-induced hearing loss. In: Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi R. (eds) New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Raven, 1982; 189-207
31. Engdahl B, Kemp DT. The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 1573-87
32. Wilson JP. Evidence for a cochlear origin of acoustic re-emissions threshold fine structure and tonal tinnitus. Hear Res 1980; 2: 233-52
33. Wilson JP, Evans EF. Effects of furosemide, flaxedil, noise and tone over-stimulation on the evoked otoacoustic emissions in the ear canal of gerbil, Proceedings of the International Union of Physiological Science 1983; 15: 100
34. Long GR, Tubis A. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 1343-53
35. Kummer P, Janssen T, Arnold W. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion product emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 197-210
36. Harris FP, Glattke T. The use of suppression to determine the characteristics of otoacoustic emissions. Semin Hear 1992; 13: 67-80
37. Brown AM, Kemp DT. Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29-37
38. Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 43: 251-62
39. Velenovsky DS, Glattke TJ. Contralateral and binaural suppression of otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 163-89
40. Perrot X, Micheyl C, Khalfa S, Collet L. Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians. Neurosci Lett 1999; 262: 167-70
41. Veuillet E, Bazin F, Collet L. Objective evidence of peripheral auditory disorders in learning impaired children. J Audiol Med 1999; 8: 18-29
42. Veuillet E, Khalfa S, Collet L. Clinical relevance of medial efferent auditory pathways. Scand Audiol Suppl 1999; 51: 53-62
43. Robinette MS, Cevette MJ, Webb TM. Otoacoustic emissions in differential diagnosis. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 297-324
44. Widen JE, O'Grady GM. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in the evaluation of children. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 375-415
45. Moore BCJ. Cochlear Hearing Loss. London: Whurr; 1998
46. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions, Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93-105
47. Kemp DT. Exploring cochlear status with otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette RM, Glattke T. (eds). Otoacoustic Emissions - Clinical Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Thieme, 2002; 1-47
48. Collet L, Veuillet E, Bene J, Morgon A. Effects of contralateral white noise on click-evoked emissions in normal and sensorineural ears: Towards an exploration of the medial olivocochlear system. Audiology 1992; 31: 1-7