Onset of basilar membrane non-linearity reflected in cubic distortion tone input-output functions

Hearing Research

Volumn 123, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 87-96

  Withnell, Robert H ^a   Yates, Graeme K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Basilar membrane; Compression threshold; Cubic distortion tone; Guinea pig

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BASILAR MEMBRANE; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; GUINEA PIG; HAIR CELL; NONHUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BASILAR MEMBRANE; GUINEA PIGS; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0032169611     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00100-2     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abdala C., Sininger Y.S., Ekelid M., Zeng F. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates. Hear. Res. 98:1996;38-53.
2. Anderson S.D. Some ECMR properties in relation to other signals from the auditory periphery. Hear. Res. 2:1980;273-296.
3. Arthur R.M., Pfeiffer R.R., Suga N. Properties of two-tone inhibition in primary auditory neurons. J. Physiol. 212:1971;593-609.
4. Brown A.M., Gaskill S.A. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1990;840-849.
5. 2. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3268-3274.
6. 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear. Res. 13:1984;29-37.
7. Brown A.M., Harris F.P., Beveridge H.A. Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3260-3267.
8. Cooper N.P., Yates G.K. Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: Variations with characteristic frequency. Hear. Res. 78:1994;221-234.
9. Delgutte B. Two-tone rate suppression in auditory nerve fibres: Dependence on suppressor frequency and level. Hear. Res. 49:1990;225-246.
10. Evans E.F. Neuroleptanaesthesia: an ideal anaesthetic procedure for long-term physiological studies of the guinea pig cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. 105:1979;185-186.
11. Fahey P.F., Allen J.B. Measurement of distortion product phase in the ear canal of the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1997;2880-2891.
12. Fay R.R. Comparative psychoacoustics. Hear. Res. 34:1988;295-306.
13. 2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1990;821-839.
14. Giguère C., Smoorenburg G.F., Kunov H. The generation of psychoacoustic combination tones in relation to two-tone suppression effects in a computational model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1997;2821-2830.
15. Gorga M.P., Stover L., Neely S.T., Montoya D. The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;968-977.
16. 2 acoustic distortion product: Changes with primary level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;2659-2669.
17. Holton T., Hudspeth A.J. The transduction channel of hair cells from the bull-frog characterised by noise analysis. J. Physiol. 375:1986;195-228.
18. Howard J., Hudspeth A.J. Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Neuron. 1:1988;189-199.
19. Hudspeth A.J. The cellular basis of hearing: The biophysics of hair cells. Science. 230:1985;745-752.
20. Jaramillo F., Markin V.S., Hudspeth A.J. Auditory illusions and the single hair cell. Nature. 364:1993;527-529.
21. Johnstone B.M., Patuzzi R., Yates G.K. Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave. Hear. Res. 22:1986;147-153.
22. Kim D.O., Molnar C.E., Matthews J.W. Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behaviour in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear canal sound pressure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:1980;1704-1721.
23. Kirk D.L., Yates G.K. Evidence for electrically evoked travelling waves in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 74:1994;38-50.
24. 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1995;197-210.
25. Marsden, J.E., 1973. Basic Complex Analysis. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA.
26. Mills D.M. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. I. Two stimulus tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1997;413-429.
27. Mills D.M., Rubel E.W. Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection. Hear. Res. 77:1994;183-199.
28. Murugasu F., Russell I.J. The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J. Neurosci. 16:1996;325-332.
29. Patuzzi R.B., Johnstone B.M., Sellick P.M. The alteration of the vibration of the basilar membrane produced by loud sound. Hear. Res. 13:1984;99-100.
30. Patuzzi R.B., Yates G.K., Johnstone B.M. Changes in cochlear microphonic and neural sensitivity produced by acoustic trauma. Hear. Res. 39:1989;189-202.
31. Patuzzi R.B., Yates G.K., Johnstone B.M. OHC receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear. Res. 42:1989;47-72.
32. Popelka G., Osterhammel P., Nielsen L., Rasmussen A. Growth of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with primary tone level in humans. Hear. Res. 71:1993;12-22.
33. Robles L., Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C. Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and phase responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80:1986;1364-1374.
34. Ruggero M.A., Robles L., Rich N.C., Recio A. Basilar membrane responses to two-tone and broadband stimuli. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 336:1992;307-315.
35. Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C., Recio A., Narayan S.S., Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1997;2151-2163.
36. Schmiedt R.A. Boundaries of two-tone rate suppression of cochlear nerve activity. Hear. Res. 7:1982;335-351.
37. Stover L., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Montoya D. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;956-967.
38. 2 acoustic distortion product. I. Model development. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;2166-2174.
39. 2 acoustic distortion product. II. Model evaluation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;2175-2183.
40. Viemeister N.F., Bacon S.P. Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1 kHz tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84:1988;172-178.
41. 2 in rabbits. In: Dallos, P., Geisler, C., Matthews, J., Ruggero, M., Steele, C. (Eds.), The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. Springer-Verlag, Madison, WI, pp. 243-250.
42. 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbit. I: Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1992;1587-1607.
43. 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:1992;2662-2682.
44. Yates G.K. Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions. Hear. Res. 50:1990;145-162.
45. Yates G.K. Auditory-nerve spontaneous rates vary predictably with threshold. Hear. Res. 57:1991;57-62.
46. Yates, G.K., Kirk, D.L., 1997. Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions - Implications for the reverse transduction process. In: Palmer, A., Rees, A., Summerfield, A., Meddis, R. (Eds.), Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing. Whurr, London, pp. 39-45.
47. Yates G.K., Winter I., Robertson D. Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range. Hear. Res. 45:1990;203-220.
48. 2) explained by a saturation feedback model. Hear. Res. 2:1980;513-518.