Mechanical responses of the organ of corti to acoustic and electrical stimulation in vitro

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 89, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 4382-4395

  Chan, Dylan K ^a   Hudspeth, A J ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; COCHLEA DUCT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTI ORGAN; DIODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERFEROMETRY; MICROSCOPY; MOTION; NONHUMAN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND TRANSMISSION; STROBOSCOPY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 27644450776     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 00063495     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.070474     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. de Boer, E. 1996. Mechanics of the cochlea: modeling efforts. In The Cochlea. P. Dallos, A.N. Popper, and R.R. Fay, editors. Springer-Verlag, New York. 258-317.
2. Robles, L., and M. A. Ruggero. 2001. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol. Rev. 81:1305-1352.
3. Cooper, N. 2000. Radial variation in the vibrations of the cochlear partition. In Recent Developments in Auditory Mechanics. H. Wada, T. Takasaka, K. Ikeda, K. Ohyama, and T. Koike, editors. World Scientific, Singapore. 109-115.
4. Rhode, W. S., and A. Recio. 2000. Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:3317-3332.
5. Richter, C. P., and P. Dallos. 2003. Micromechanics in the gerbil hemicochlea. In Biophysics of the Cochlea: From Molecules to Models. A.W. Gummer, editor. World Scientific, Singapore. 279-284.
6. Nilsen, K. E., and I. J. Russell. 1999. Timing of cochlear feedback: spatial and temporal representation of a tone across the basilar membrane. Nat. Neurosci. 2:642-648.
7. Reuter, G., A. H. Gitter, U. Thurm, and H. P. Zenner. 1992. High frequency radial movements of the reticular lamina induced by outer hair cell motility. Hear. Res. 60:236-246.
8. Xue, S., D. C. Mountain, and A. E. Hubbard. 1995. Electrically evoked basilar membrane motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:3030-3041.
9. Nuttall, A. L., M. Guo, and T. Ren. 1999. The radial pattern of basilar membrane motion evoked by electric stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 131:39-46.
10. Scherer, M. P., and A. W. Gummer. 2005. Vibration pattern of the organ of Corti up to 50 kHz: evidence for resonant electromechanical force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:17652-17657.
11. Mammano, F., and J. F. Ashmore. 1993. Reverse transduction measured in the isolated cochlea by laser Michelson interferometry. Nature. 365:838-841.
12. Ren, T., A. L. Nuttall, and J. M. Miller. 1996. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from Gerbil cochlea. Hear. Res. 102:43-50.
13. 2+ current-driven nonlinear amplification by the mammalian cochlea in vitro. Nat. Neurosci. 8:149-155.
14. Hudspeth, A.J., and D.K. Chan. 2005. An experimental preparation of the mammalian cochlea that displays compressive nonlinearity in vitro. In Auditory Mechanisms: Processes and Models. A. L. Nuttall, editor. World Scientific, Singapore. In press.
15. th Ed. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. 1344-1616.
16. Olson, E. 1999. Direct measurement of intra-cochlear pressure waves. Nature. 402:526-529.
17. Lucas, B., and T. Kanade. 1981. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. Proceedings of the DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, Los Angeles, CA.
18. Abràmoff, M. D., W. J. Niessen, and M. A. Viergever. 2000. Objective quantification of the motion of soft tissues: an application to orbital soft tissue motion. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 19:986-995.
19. Bozovic, D., and A. J. Hudspeth. 2003. Hair-bundle movements elicited by transepithelial electrical stimulation of hair cells in the sacculus of the bullfrog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:958-963.
20. Rhode, W. S., and C. D. Geisler. 1967. Model of the displacement between opposing points on the tectorial membrane and reticular lamina. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42:185-190.
21. Hu, X., B. N. Evans, and P. Dallos. 1999. Direct visualization of organ of Corti kinematics in a hemicochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 82:2798-2807.
22. Patuzzi, R. 1996. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In The Cochlea, P. Dallos, A.N. Popper, and R.R. Fay, editors. Springer-Verlag, New York. 186-257.
23. 2+ concentration on hair-bundle stiffness and gating-spring integrity in hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:11923-11928.
24. Assad, J. A., G. M. Shepherd, and D. P. Corey. 1991. Tip-link integrity and mechanical transduction in vertebrate hair cells. Neuron. 7:985-994.
25. Benser, M. E., N. P. Issa, and A. J. Hudspeth. 1993. Hair-bundle stiffness dominates the elastic reactance to otolithic-membrane shear. Hear. Res. 68:243-252.
26. Goodyear, R., and G. Richardson. 1999. The ankle-link antigen: an epitope sensitive to calcium chelation associated with the hair-cell surface and the calycal processes of photoreceptors. J. Neurosci. 19:3761-3772.
27. Bashtanov, M. E., R. J. Goodyear, G. P. Richardson, and I. J. Russell. 2004. The mechanical properties of chick (Gallus domesticus) sensory hair bundles: relative contributions of structures sensitive to calcium chelation and subtilisin treatment. J. Physiol. 559:287-299.
28. Freeman, D. M., C. C. Abnet, W. Hemmert, B. S. Tsai, and T. F. Weiss. 2003. Dynamic material properties of the tectorial membrane: a summary. Hear. Res. 180:1-10.
29. Aranyosi, A. J., and D. M. Freeman. 2004. Sound-induced motions of individual cochlear hair bundles. Biophys. J. 87:3536-3546.
30. Fridberger, A., and J. B. de Monvel. 2003. Sound-induced differential motion within the hearing organ. Nat. Neurosci. 6:446-448.
31. Gummer, A. W., B. M. Johnstone, and N. J. Armstrong. 1981. Direct measurement of basilar membrane stiffness in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70:1298-1309.
32. Olson, E. S., and D. C. Mountain. 1991. In vivo measurement of basilar membrane stiffness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1262-1275.
33. Naidu, R. C., and D. C. Mountain. 1998. Measurements of the stiffness map challenge a basic tenet of cochlear theories. Hear. Res. 124:124-131.
34. Emadi, G., C. P. Richter, and P. Dallos. 2004. Stiffness of the gerbil basilar membrane: radial and longitudinal variations. J. Neurophysiol. 91:474-488.
35. Plassmann, W., W. Peetz, and M. Schmidt. 1987. The cochlea in gerbilline rodents. Brain Behav. Evol. 30:82-101.
36. Abnet, C. C., and D. M. Freeman. 2000. Deformations of the isolated mouse tectorial membrane produced by oscillatory forces. Hear. Res. 144:29-46.
37. Géléoc, G. S., G. W. Lennan, G. P. Richardson, and C. J. Kros. 1997. A quantitative comparison of mechanoelectrical transduction in vestibular and auditory hair cells of neonatal mice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 264:611-621.
38. van Netten, S. M., T. Dinklo, W. Marcotti, and C. J. Kros. 2003. Channel gating forces govern accuracy of mechano-electrical transduction in hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:15510-15515.
39. Strelioff, D., and Å. Flock. 1984. Stiffness of sensory-cell hair bundles in the isolated guinea-pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 15:19-28.
40. Kössl, M., G. P. Richardson, and I. J. Russell. 1990. Stereocilia bundle stiffness: effects of neomycin sulphate, A23187 and concanavalin A. Hear. Res. 44:217-230.
41. Kennedy, H. J., A. C. Crawford, and R. Fettiplace. 2005. Force generation by mammalian hair bundles supports a role in cochlear amplification. Nature. 433:880-883.
42. Langer, M. G., S. Fink, A. Koitschev, U. Rexhausen, J. K. H. Hörber, and J. P. Ruppersberg. 2001. Lateral mechanical coupling of stereocilia in cochlear hair bundles. Biophys. J. 80:2608-2621.