The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig

Hearing Research

Volumn 183, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 7-17

  Goodman, Shawn S ^a   Withnell, Robert H ^a   Shera, Christopher A ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

Microstructure; Otoacoustic emission; SFOAE

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GUINEA PIG; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 0141678340     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00193-X     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brass D., Kemp D.T. Time-domain observation of otoacoustic emissions during constant tone stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90:1991;2415-2427.
2. Brass D., Kemp D.T. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;920-939.
3. Dhar S., Talmadge C.L., Long G., Tubis A. Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:2002;2882-2897.
4. Fahey P.F., Stagner B.B., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:2000;1786-1802.
5. 2 removes DP-gram microstructure - evidence for a secondary generator. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:1998;1527-1531.
6. Kalluri R., Shera C.A. Distortion-product source unmixing: A test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:2001;622-637.
7. Kemp D.T., Chum R. Properties of the generator of the stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 2:1980;533-548.
8. Kemp D.T., Ryan S., Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 11:1990;93-105.
9. Shera, C.A., 2003. Wave interference in the generation of reflection- and distortion-source emissions. In: Gummer, A.W. (Ed.), Biophysics of the Cochlea: From Molecule to Model. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 439-449.
10. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J. Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: A test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2003;2762-2772.
11. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;782-798.
12. Shera C.A., Zweig G. Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;3333-3352.
13. Souter M. Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions from guinea pig and human subjects. Hear. Res. 90:1995;1-11.
14. Talmadge C.L., Tubis A., Long G.R., Piskorski P. Modelling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold microstructures. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1998;1517-1543.
15. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Tubis A., Dhar S. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the microstructure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;275-292.
16. Talmadge C.L., Tubis A., Long G.R., Tong C. Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission microstructure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:2000;2911-2932.
17. Withnell R.H., Shaffer L.A., Talmadge C.L. Generation of DPOAEs in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 178:2003;106-117.
18. Withnell R.H., Kirk D.L., Yates G.K. Otoacoustic emissions measured with a physically open recording system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1998;350-355.
19. Withnell R.H., Yates G.K. Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission with the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1998;344-349.
20. Zweig G., Shera C.A. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1995;2018-2047.
21. Zwicker E., Schloth E. Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75:1984;1148-1154.