Role of the Tectorial Membrane Revealed by Otoacoustic Emissions Recorded from Wild-Type and Transgenic TectaΔENT/ΔENT Mice

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 163-171

  Lukashkin, Andrei N ^a   Lukashkina, Victoria A ^a   Legan, P Kevin ^a   Richardson, Guy P ^a   Russell, Ian J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; KETAMINE; XYLAZINE;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; COCHLEA DUCT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HAIR CELL; MOUSE; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSGENIC MOUSE; WILD TYPE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; FEEDBACK; HEARING; MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEINS; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; TECTORIAL MEMBRANE;

EID: 0347719209     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00680.2003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allen JB and Fahey PF. A second cochlear frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurement. J Acoust Soc Am 94: 809-817, 1993.
2. Assad JA and Corey DP. An active motor model for adaptation by vertebrate hair cells. J Neurosci 12: 3291-3309, 1992.
3. Bian L, Chertoff ME, and Miller E. Deriving a cochlear transducer function from low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 112: 198-210, 2002.
4. Brown AM, Gaskill SA, and Williams DM. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci 250: 29-34, 1992.
5. Brown AM and Kemp DT. Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 13: 29-37, 1984.
6. Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, and de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear hair cells. Science 227: 194-196, 1985.
7. Crawford AC, Evans MG, and Fettiplace R. Activation and adaptation of transducer currents in turtle hair cells. J Physiol 419: 405-434, 1989.
8. Fahey PF, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, and Martin GK. Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas. J Acoust Soc Am 108: 1786-1802, 2000.
9. Frank G and Kössl M. The acoustic two tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the gain and the operating point of the cochlear amplifier. Hear Res 98: 104-115, 1996.
10. Frank G and Kössl M. Acoustical and electrical biasing of the cochlear partition. Effects on the acoustic two tone distortions f2-f1 and 2f1-f2. Hear Res 113: 57-68, 1997.
11. Frolenkov GI, Belyantseva IA, Kurc M, Mastroianni MA, and Kachar B. Cochlear outer hair cell electromotility can provide force for both low and high intensity distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 126: 67-74, 1998.
12. 2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 88: 821-839, 1990.
13. Geisler CD and Sang CN. A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces. Hear Res 86: 132-146, 1995.
14. Gummer AW, Hemmert W, and Zenner HP. Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: its crucial role in frequency tuning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 8727-8732, 1996.
15. 1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 85: 220-229, 1989.
16. Kanis LJ and de Boer E. Frequency dependence of acoustic distortion products in a locally active model of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 101: 1527-1531, 1997.
17. 2 area study. J Acoust Soc Am 107: 457-473, 2000.
18. Kros CJ, Lennan GWT, and Richardson GP. Transducer currents and bundle movements in outer hair cells of neonatal mice. In: Active Hearing, edited by Flock A, Ottoson D, and Ulfendahl M, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1995, p. 113-125.
19. Legan PK, Lukashkina VA, Goodyear RJ, Kössl M, Russell IJ, and Richardson GP. A targeted deletion in α-tectorin reveals that the tectorial membrane is required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedback. Neuron 28: 273-285, 2000.
20. Liberman MC, Gao J, He DZZ, Wu X, Jia S, and Zuo J. Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier. Nature 419: 300-304, 2002.
21. Lukashkin AN, Lukashkina VA, and Russell IJ. One source for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generated by low- and high-level primaries. J Acoust Soc Am 111: 2740-2748, 2002.
22. Lukashkin AN and Russell IJ. A descriptive model of the receptor potential nonlinearities generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer. J Acoust Soc Am 103: 973-980, 1998.
23. Lukashkin AN and Russell IJ. Analysis of the f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion components generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer: dependence on the amplitudes of the primaries and feedback gain. J Acoust Soc Am 106: 2661-2668, 1999.
24. Lukashkin AN and Russell IJ. Origin of the bell-like dependence of the DPOAE amplitude on primary frequency ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 110: 3097-3106, 2001.
25. Lukashkin AN and Russell IJ. A second, low frequency mode of vibration in the intact mammalian cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 113: 1544-1550, 2003.
26. Markin VS and Hudspeth AJ. Modelling the active process of the cochlea: phase relations, amplification, and spontaneous oscillation. Biophys J 69: 138-147, 1995.
27. Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Scheinin SA, and Coats AC. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 28: 191-208, 1987.
28. Nilsen KE and Russell IJ. Timing of cochlear feedback: spatial and temporal representation of a tone across the basilar membrane. Nat Neurosci 2: 642-648, 1999.
29. Patuzzi RB, Yates GK, and Johnstone BM. Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 42: 47-72, 1989.
30. Russell IJ and Kössl M. Sensory transduction and frequency selectivity in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. Phil Trans Roy Soc 336: 317-324, 1992.
31. Santos-Sacchi J. Harmonics of outer hair cell motility. Biophys J 65: 2217-2227, 1993.
32. Stover LJ, Neely ST, and Gorga MP. Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 106: 2669-2678, 1999.
33. Taschenberger G, Gallo L, and Manley GA. Filtering of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear of birds and lizards. Hear Res 91: 87-92, 1995.
34. Vetešník A and Nobili R. Phase behavior of the primaries in distortion product analysis. In: Biophysics of the Cochlea: From Molecules to Models, edited by Gummer AW. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003, p. 557-558.
35. Weiss TF and Leong R. A model for signal transmission in an ear having hair cells with free-standing stereocilia. IV. Mechanoelectric transduction stage. Hear Res 20: 175-195, 1985.
36. Zheng J, Shen W, He DZZ, Long KB, Madison LD, and Dallos P. Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 405: 149-155, 2000.