Phylogenetic analyses of phylum Actinobacteria based on whole genome sequences

Research in Microbiology

Volumn 164, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 718-728

  Verma, Mansi ^a,b   Lal, Devi ^a,c   Kaur, Jaspreet ^a   Saxena, Anjali ^a   Kaur, Jasvinder ^a   Anand, Shailly ^a   Lal, Rup ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Actinobacteria; Concatenated tree; Consensus tree; Genome based phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ACTINOBACTERIA; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; CONSENSUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ACTINOBACTERIA;

EID: 84881549345     PISSN: 09232508     EISSN: 17697123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adekambi T., Butler R.W., Hanrahan F., Delcher A.L., Drancourt M., Shinnick T.M. Core gene set as the basis of multilocus sequence analysis of the subclass Actinobacteridae. PLoS One 2011, 6:e14792.
2. Alam M.T., Merlo M.E., Takano E., Breitling R. Genome-based phylogenetic analysis of Streptomyces and its relatives. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 54:763-772.
3. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215:403-410.
4. Anisimova M., Bielawski J., Dunn K., Yang Z. Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:154.
5. Atlas R. Principles of Microbiology 1997, WCB McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
6. Belda E., Moya A., Silva F.J. Genome rearrangement distances and gene order phylogeny in γ-proteobacteria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22:1456-1467.
7. Blanchette M., Kunisawa T., Sankoff D. Gene order breakpoint evidence in animal mitochondrial phylogeny. J. Mol. Evol. 1999, 49:193-203.
8. Casanova J.L., Abel L. Genetic dissection of immunity to mycobacteria: the human model. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 20:581-620.
9. Cheng C.H., Yang C.H., Chiu H.T., Lu C.L. Reconstructing genome trees of prokaryotes using overlapping genes. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11:102.
10. Ciccarelli F.D., Doerks T., von Mering C., Creevey C.J., Snel B., Bork P. Towards automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 2006, 311:1283-1287.
11. Comas I., Moya A., González-Candelas F. From phylogenetics to phylogenomics: the evolutionary relationships of insect endosymbiotic γ-proteobacteria as a test case. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:1-16.
12. Dagan T., Martin W. The tree of one percent. Genome Biol. 2006, 7:118.
13. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:e68.
14. Devulder G., Pérouse de Montclos M., Flandrois J.P. A multigene approach to phylogenetic analysis using the genus Mycobacterium as a model. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55:293-302.
15. Felsenstein J. Phylip (Phylogeny Inference Package) 1993, Version 3 57c, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle Distribution. http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html.
16. Fukuda Y., Nakayama Y., Tomita M. On dynamics of overlapping genes in bacterial genomes. Gene 2003, 323:181-187.
17. Gadagkar S.R., Rosenberg M.S., Kumar S. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. J. Exp. Zool. 2005, 304:64-74.
18. Galtier N. A model of horizontal gene transfer and the bacterial phylogeny problem. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:633-642.
19. Gao B., Gupta R.S. Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2012, 76:66-112.
20. Garnier F., Gerbaud G., Courvalin P., Galimand M. Identification of clinically relevant viridans group streptococci to the species level by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35:2337-2341.
21. Garrity G.M., Bell J.A., Lilburn T.G. The revised road map to the manual. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2005, vol. 2:159-220. Springer, New York, NY.
22. Guo Y., Zheng W., Rong X., Huang Y. A multilocus phylogeny of the Streptomyces griseus 16S rRNA gene clade: use of multilocus sequence analysis for streptomycete systematics. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58:149-159.
23. Jiang L.-W., Lin K.-L., Lu C.L. OGtree: a tool for creating genome trees of prokaryotes based on overlapping genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:W475-W480.
24. Johnson Z.I., Chisholm S.W. Properties of overlapping genes are conserved across microbial genomes. Genome Res. 2004, 14:2268-2272.
25. Kawamura Y., Itoh Y., Mishima N., Ohkusu K., Kasai H., Ezaki T. High genetic similarity of Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus difficilis: S. difficilis Eldar etal. 1995 is a later synonym of S. agalactiae Lehmann and Neumann 1896 (approved lists 1980). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55:961-965.
26. Krakauer D.C. Stability and evolution of overlapping genes. Evolution 2000, 54:731-739.
27. Leblond-Bourget N., Philippe H., Mangin I., Decaris B. 16S rRNA and 16S to 23S internal transcribed spacer sequence analyses reveal inter- and intraspecific Bifidobacterium phylogeny. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996, 46:102-111.
28. Lechevalier H.A., Lechevalier M.P. Biology of actinomycetes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1967, 21:71-100.
29. Lee S.D. Kineococcus marinus sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment of the coast of Jeju, Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56:1279-1283.
30. Lu Z., Zhang W. Comparative phylogenies of ribosomal proteins and the 16S rRNA gene at higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 2012, 65:1-6.
31. Ludwig W., Euzeby J., Schumann P., Busse H.J., Trujillo M.E., Kampfer P., Whitman W.B. Road Map of the Actinobacteria. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2012, vol. 5:1-28. Springer, New York, NY.
32. Mignard S., Flandrois J.P. A seven-gene, multilocus, genus-wide approach to the phylogeny of mycobacteria using supertrees. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58:1432-1441.
33. Narechania A., Baker R.H., Sit R., Kolokotronis S.-O., DeSalle R., Planet P.J. Random addition concatenation analysis: a novel approach to the exploration of phylogenomic signal reveals strong agreement between core and shell genomic partitions in the cyanobacteria. Genome Biol. Evol. 2012, 4:30-43.
34. Normand P. The families Frankiaceae, Geodtermatophilaceae, Acidothermaceae and Sproicchtthyaceae. The Prokaryotes: An Evolving Electronic Resource for the Microbiological Community 2006, 669-681. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K.H. Schleifer, E. Stackebrandt (Eds.).
35. Normand P., Lapierre P., Tisa L.S., et al. Genome characteristics of facultatively symbiotic Frankia sp. strains reflect host range and host plant biogeography. Genome Res. 2007, 1:7-15.
36. Price M.N., Dehal P.S., Arkin A.P. FastTree 2 - approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 2010, 5:e9490.
37. Qi J., Luo H., Hao B. CVTree: a phylogenetic tree reconstruction tool based on whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:W45-W47.
38. Qi J., Wang B., Hao B.-l. Whole proteome prokaryote phylogeny without sequence alignment: a K-string composition approach. J. Mol. Evol. 2004, 58:1-11.
39. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 2003, 425:798-804.
40. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
41. Sankoff D. Genome rearrangement with gene families. Bioinformatics 1999, 15:909-917.
42. Schrempf H. Recognition and degradation of chitin by streptomycetes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2001, 79:285-289.
43. Shivannavar C.T., Katoch V.M., Sharma V.D., Patil M.A., Katoch K., Bharadwaj V.P., Sharma R.K., Bhatia A.S., Agrawal B.M. Determination of mycobacterial phylogeny on the basis of immunological relatedness of superoxide dismutases. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996, 46:1164-1169.
44. Snel B., Bork P., Huynen M.A. Genome phylogeny based on gene content. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21:108-110.
45. Snel B., Huynen M.A., Dutilh B.E. Genome trees and the nature of genome evolution. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 59:191-209.
46. Takahashi K., Nei M. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution and maximum likelihood when large number of sequences are used. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17:1251-1258.
47. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
48. Teng L.J., Hsueh P.R., Tsai J.C., Chen P.W., Hsu J.C., Lai H.C., Lee C.N., Ho S.W. groESL sequence determination, phylogenetic analysis and species differentiation for viridians group streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40:3172-3178.
49. Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D.G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25:4876-4882.
50. Ventura M., Canchaya C., Tauch A., Chandra G., Fitzgerald G.F., Chater K.F., van Sinderen D. Genomics of Actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71:495-548.
51. Woese C.R. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 1987, 51:221-271.
52. Woese C.R., Kandler O., Wheelis M.L. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria and Eucarya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87:4576-4579.
53. Woese C.R., Fox G.E. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1977, 74:5088-5090.
54. Wu D., et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009, 462:1056-1060.
55. Yi, H., 2011. Co-phylum: an assembly-free phylogenomic approach for close related organisms. (arXiv:1009.4141v3[g-bio.Qm]).
56. Zhi X.Y., Li W.J., Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59:589-608.
57. Zuo G., Xu Z., Yu H., Hao B. Jackknife and bootstrap tests of thecomposition vector trees. Genomics Proteomics Bioinform. 2010, 8:262-267.