Updates and Revisions to the BI-RADS Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lexicon

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 483-493

  Edwards, Sonya D ^a   Lipson, Jafi A ^a   Ikeda, Debra M ^a   Lee, Janie M ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

BI RADS; Breast; Lexicon; MRI

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACCREDITATION; ANGIOGENESIS; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MORPHOLOGY; NON MASS ENHANCEMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REVIEW;

EID: 84881369828     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: 15579786     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2013.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Kopans D.B. Standardized mammography reporting. Radiol Clin North Am 1992, 30:257-264.
2. American College of Radiology Breast imaging reporting and data system® (BI-RADS®) 1992, American College of Radiology, Reston (VA). 1st edition.
3. American College of Radiology Breast imaging reporting and data system® (BI-RADS®) 2003, American College of Radiology, Reston (VA). 4th edition.
4. Agrawal G., Su M.Y., Nalcioglu O., et al. Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon. Cancer 2009, 115:1363-1380.
5. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006, 238:42-53.
6. Raza S., Vallejo M., Chikarmane S.A., et al. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 191:689-699.
7. Nie K., Chen J.H., Yu H.J., et al. Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol 2008, 15:1513-1525.
8. Macura K.J., Ouwerkerk R., Jacobs M.A., et al. Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 2006, 26:1719-1734.
9. Sohns C., Scherrer M., Staab W., et al. Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 2011, 21:2475-2483.
10. Ikeda D.M., Hylton N.M., Kinkel K., et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. JMagn Reson Imaging 2001, 13:889-895.
11. Wiener J.I., Chako A.C., Merten C.W., et al. Breast and axillary tissue MR imaging: correlation of signal intensities and relaxation times with pathologic findings. Radiology 1986, 160:299-305.
12. Kuhl C.K., Klaschik S., Mielcarek P., et al. Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI?. JMagn Reson Imaging 1999, 9:187-196.
13. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007, 244:356-378.
14. Ko E.S., Lee B.H., Choi H.Y., et al. Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 2011, 80:719-723.
15. Cubuk R., Tasali N., Narin B., et al. Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography. Radiol Med 2010, 115:434-441.
16. Hambly N.M., Liberman L., Dershaw D.D., et al. Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011, 196:218-224.
17. DeMartini W.B., Liu F., Peacock S., et al. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012, 198:W373-W380.
18. Morris E. The normal breast (Chapter 4). Breast MRI: diagnosis and intervention 2005, 23-44. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc, New York. E. Morris (Ed.).
19. Kuhl C.K., Bieling H.B., Gieseke J., et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 1997, 203:137-144.
20. Delille J.P., Slanetz P.J., Yeh E.D., et al. Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: breast tissue perfusion determined with MR imaging-initial observations. Radiology 2005, 235:36-41.
21. Muller-Schimpfle M., Ohmenhauser K., Stoll P., et al. Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1997, 203:145-149.
22. Hegenscheid K., Schmidt C.O., Seipel R., et al. Contrast enhancement kinetics of normal breast parenchyma in dynamic MR mammography: effects of menopausal status, oral contraceptives, and postmenopausal hormone therapy. Eur Radiol 2012, 22:2633-2640.
23. Soderqvist G., Isaksson E., von Schoultz B., et al. Proliferation of breast epithelial cells in healthy women during the menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 176:123-128.
24. Heinig A., Lampe D., Kolbl H., et al. Suppression of unspecific enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by antiestrogen medication. Tumori 2002, 88:215-223.
25. Kuhl C.K., Schild H.H. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. JMagn Reson Imaging 2000, 12:965-974.
26. Heywang-Kobrunner S.H., Viehweg P., Heinig A., et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 1997, 24:94-108.
27. Perman W.H., Heiberg E.M., Grunz J., et al. Afast 3D-imaging technique for performing dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 1994, 12:545-551.
28. Ballesio L., Savelli S., Angeletti M., et al. Breast MRI: are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions?. Eur J Radiol 2009, 71:96-101.
29. Okafuji T., Yabuuchi H., Sakai S., et al. MR imaging features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Radiol 2006, 60:405-413.
30. Yuen S., Uematsu T., Kasami M., et al. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis. JMagn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:502-510.
31. Tozaki M., Igarashi T., Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187:313-321.
32. Tozaki M., Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187:330-337.
33. Uematsu T., Kasami M. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012, 198:1223-1230.
34. Mahoney M.C., Gatsonis C., Hanna L., et al. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging. Radiology 2012, 264:51-58.
35. Agliozzo S., De Luca M., Bracco C., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features. Med Phys 2012, 39:1704-1715.
36. Stoutjesdijk M.J., Zijp M., Boetes C., et al. Computer aided analysis of breast MRI enhancement kinetics using mean shift clustering and multifeature iterative region of interest selection. JMagn Reson Imaging 2012, 36:1104-1112.
37. Rakoczy M., McGaughey D., Korenberg M.J., et al. Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. JDigit Imaging 2013, 26(2):198-208.
38. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 1999, 211:101-110.
39. Bluemke D.A., Gatsonis C.A., Chen M.H., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004, 292:2735-2742.
40. Williams T.C., DeMartini W.B., Partridge S.C., et al. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007, 244:94-103.
41. Wang L.C., DeMartini W.B., Partridge S.C., et al. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:826-831.
42. Gorczyca D.P. MR imaging of breast implants. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1994, 2:659-672.
43. Gorczyca D.P., Schneider E., DeBruhl N.D., et al. Silicone breast implant rupture: comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994, 162:305-310.
44. Middleton M.S., McNamara M.P. Breast implant classification with MR imaging correlation. Radiographics 2000, 20:E1.
45. Brown S.L., Silverman B.G., Berg W.A. Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet 1997, 350:1531-1537.
46. Holmich L.R., Vejborg I., Conrad C., et al. The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation. Eur J Radiol 2005, 53:213-225.
47. Ikeda D.M., Borofsky H.B., Herfkens R.J., et al. Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999, 104:2054-2062.
48. Di Benedetto G., Cecchini S., Grassetti L., et al. Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings. Breast J 2008, 14:532-537.
49. Cher D.J., Conwell J.A., Mandel J.S. MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: meta-analysis and implications. Ann Plast Surg 2001, 47:367-380.
50. Soo M.S., Kornguth P.J., Walsh R., et al. Intracapsular implant rupture: MR findings of incomplete shell collapse. JMagn Reson Imaging 1997, 7:724-730.
51. Liberman L., Abramson A.F., Squires F.B., et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998, 171:35-40.
52. Hong A.S., Rosen E.L., Soo M.S., et al. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184:1260-1265.
53. Gutierrez R.L., DeMartini W.B., Eby P.R., et al. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:994-1000.
54. Baltzer P.A., Benndorf M., Dietzel M., et al. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 194:1658-1663.
55. Sickles E.A. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991, 179:463-468.
56. Sung J.S., Lee C.H., Morris E.A., et al. Patient follow-up after concordant histologically benign imaging-guided biopsy of MRI-detected lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012, 198:1464-1469.
57. Marshall A.L., Domchek S.M., Weinstein S.P. Follow-up frequency and compliance in women with probably benign findings on breast magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Radiol 2012, 19:406-411.
58. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Benton C.L., et al. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women. Cancer 2003, 98:377-388.